EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 730 (2026) E3S Web Conf., 730 (2026) 04010 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 730, 2026
International Conference on Advances and Innovations in Soft Soil Engineering (Soft Soils 2026)
Article Number 04010
Number of page(s) 8
Section Ground Improvement and Low-Carbon Solutions
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202673004010
Published online 03 August 2026
  1. F. Geng, W. Yang, S. Nadimi, and Z. Hu, Development and prediction of scour around offshore wind turbine monopile foundations in ebb and flow tides, Ocean Eng. 311, 118905 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.118905 [Google Scholar]
  2. F. Sha, J. Xu, S. Gu, Y. Dong, and W. Xiao, A review on fluid-sediment and foundation-sediment coupling mechanisms and anti-scour countermeasures, Mar. Struct. 103, 103843 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marstruc.2025.103843 [Google Scholar]
  3. R. Hu, Y. Lu, H. Leng, H. Liu, and W. Shi, A novel countermeasure for preventing scour around monopile foundations using Ionic Soil Stabilizer solidified slurry, Appl. Ocean Res. 121, 103121 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2022.103121 [Google Scholar]
  4. H. Kang, X. Han, X. Wang, Z. Cai, Y. Guan, and W. Wang, Improving the scour-resistance performance of for offshore wind turbines: Experimental and computational fluid dynamics studies on macro and micro characteristics, Constr. Build. Mater. 444, 137762 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.137762 [Google Scholar]
  5. X. Li, Z. Zhu, R. Liu, C. Zhang, Q. Zhang, S. Li, and M. Chen, Preparation of anti-washout cement-stabilized marine soft clay for scouring protection of wind power pile foundations, Mar. Georesources Geotechnol. 42, 506 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1080/1064119X.2023.2204335 [Google Scholar]
  6. G. Habert, C. Billard, P. Rossi, C. Chen, and N. Roussel, Cement production technology improvement compared to factor 4 objectives, Cem. Concr. Res. 40, 820 (2010). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2009.09.031 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. S. Rios, N. Cristelo, A. Viana da Fonseca, and C. Ferreira, Structural Performance of Alkali-Activated Soil Ash versus Soil Cement, J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 28, 1 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001398 [Google Scholar]
  8. S. Singh, A. Kumar, and T. G. Sitharam, Experimental study on strength, durability, hydraulic and toxicity characteristics of soil treated with mine tailings based geopolymers for sustainable road subgrade application, Constr. Build. Mater. 414, 134894 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.134894 [Google Scholar]
  9. X. Sun, W. Liu, X. Chen, S. Wu, G. Chen, Y. Bi, and Z. Chen, Sustainable solutions: Transforming waste shield tunnelling soil into geopolymer-based underwater backfills, J. Clean. Prod. 445, 141363 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141363 [Google Scholar]
  10. A. Noushini and A. Castel, Performance-based criteria to assess the suitability of geopolymer concrete in marine environments using modified ASTM C1202 and ASTM C1556 methods, Mater. Struct. 51, 146 (2018). http://link.springer.com/10.1617/s11527-018-1267-z [Google Scholar]
  11. D. Patwa, Z. Sang, S. Zhang, K. Yao, Z. Liu, L. Liu, H. Cao, and Z. Yao, Sustainable anti-washout geopolymer grout from soil-fly ash-GGBS for scour protection of offshore structures under in-situ conditions, J. Sustain. Cem. Mater. 15, 408 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1080/21650373.2025.2569893 [Google Scholar]
  12. D. Patwa, K. Yao, Z. Sang, Z. Liu, L. Liu, and Z. Yao, Strength, Flow, Setting, and Antiwashout Performance of Alkali-Activated Soil-Fly Ash-GGBS Grout for Scouring Protection of Marine Structures, J. Mater. Civ. Eng. (2026). 10.1061/JMCEE7.MTENG-22813 [Google Scholar]
  13. H. X. Chen, Q. P. Xue, Z. P. Ma, L. Gao, and S. J. Feng, Experimental study on barrier performance and durability under dry-wet cycles of fly ash based geopolymer cutoff wall backfill, Constr. Build. Mater. 368, 130415 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.130415 [Google Scholar]
  14. O. Burciaga-Díaz, L. Y. Gómez-Zamorano, and J. I. Escalante-García, Influence of the long term curing temperature on the hydration of alkaline binders of blast furnace slag-metakaolin, Constr. Build. Mater. 113, 917 (2016). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.111 [Google Scholar]
  15. X. Ji, Z. Wang, X. Wang, X. Zhao, H. Zhang, and T. Zhang, Microstructures and properties of alkali-activated slags with composite activator: Effects of Na2O equivalents, J. Clean. Prod. 450, 141754 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141754 [Google Scholar]
  16. A. M. Rashad, S. R. Zeedan, and A. A. Hassan, Influence of the activator concentration of sodium silicate on the thermal properties of alkali-activated slag pastes, Constr. Build. Mater. 102, 811 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.11.023 [Google Scholar]
  17. GB/T 8077-2023, Methods for Testing Uniformity of Concrete Admixtures, (2023). https://www.chinesestandard.net/PDF/English.aspx/GBT8077-2023 [Google Scholar]
  18. ASTM C191-21 (2021), Standard Test Methods for Time of Setting of Hydraulic Cement by Vicat Needle, ASTM Int. 1, 5 (2021). 10.1520/C0191-21.2 [Google Scholar]
  19. ASTM C1928/C1928M-23, Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Alkali Activated Cementitious Material Mortars ( Using 2-in . [ 50 mm ] Cube Specimens ), ASTM Int. West Conshohocken, PA United States (2023). 10.1520/C1928 [Google Scholar]
  20. S. Samantasinghar and S. P. Singh, Fresh and Hardened Properties of Fly Ash–Slag Blended Geopolymer Paste and Mortar, Int. J. Concr. Struct. Mater. 13, 1 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  21. S. Fang, E. S. S. Lam, B. Li, and B. Wu, Effect of alkali contents, moduli and curing time on engineering properties of alkali activated slag, Constr. Build. Mater. 249, (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117481 [Google Scholar]
  22. W. C. Wang, H. Y. Wang, and H. C. Tsai, Study on engineering properties of alkali-activated ladle furnace slag geopolymer, Constr. Build. Mater. 123, 800 (2016). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.07.068 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.