Issue |
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 172, 2020
12th Nordic Symposium on Building Physics (NSB 2020)
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 06002 | |
Number of page(s) | 7 | |
Section | Indoor climate | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202017206002 | |
Published online | 30 June 2020 |
Effect of moisture buffering on surface temperature variation: study of different indoor cladding materials
1 University of Grenoble Alps, CEA, LITEN, INES, Grenoble, France
2 University of Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, LOCIE, Chambéry, France
* Corresponding author: legros.clemence@outlook.fr
The building materials used indoors constantly interact with the environment in which the occupants live. Recent studies have shown that natural materials, such as wood, can improve human well-being. In addition, the building materials facing the indoor air are able to adsorb and desorb water vapour from their surface and exchange it with the surrounding air. This mass exchange comes along with heat exchange, modifying their surface temperature, and thus the indoor environment. Therefore, in this article, we are investigating whether moisture buffering has an impact on comfort. For this purpose, room-scale numerical simulations have been carried out with WUFI Plus, comparing two types of interior cladding materials: painted plasterboards and a raw spruce panelling. The results show a slightly lower surface temperature and air temperature during the summer period when using spruce. A higher hygroscopicity of the spruce than the gypsum can explain this difference in behaviour between the two studied materials. Thus, spruce exchanges more latent heat with the surrounding air. However, only this thermal difference cannot explain the difference in comfort perception between the gypsum and the wood.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2020
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.