Water Quality Pollutants and Health Risk assessment for Four Different Drinking Water Sources

Key Laboratory of Food Nutrition and Safety of Ministry of EducationTianjin University of Science and Technology, Tianjin 300457, P.R.china

^* Corresponding author: E-mail: 2695126653@qq.com

Abstract

Drinking water quality has become a great concern to the whole society, especially in heavily polluted rural areas. This paper analyzes the water quality of 100 water supping the US Environmental Protection Agency's (USEPA) recommended health risk assessment model. The results showed that the microbial indicators exceeded the standard in the whole year, and some of the water supply units which lead, nitrated and dissolved solids exceeding the standard. The model recommended by EPA is applied to establish risk assessment model for health risk assessment of adults in wet and dry seasons, respectively. Results of HRA indicated that carcinogenic risk of chromium was 7.61E-05a^-1 and the risk value of arsenic was 9.92E-06a^-1 which exceed the maximum acceptable risk level recommended by USEPA 5.0×10^-5 closely to the ICPR recommendation 1.0×10^-6. Meanwhile we conduct health risk assessment (HRA) on relevant non-carcinogenic indicators: nitrate is 2.95E-09a^-1, the risk value of fluoride (F) is 2.49E-09a^-1, the risk value of lead is 2.39E-09a^-1 and copper (Cu) 9.00E-10a^-1 exceeds the maximum acceptable risk level risk value recommended by USEPA 1.0×10^-9. The above indicators require priority control and management of pollutants that are prioritized and managed.