Issue |
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 194, 2020
2020 5th International Conference on Advances in Energy and Environment Research (ICAEER 2020)
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 01022 | |
Number of page(s) | 4 | |
Section | Energy Engineering and Energy Development and Utilization | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202019401022 | |
Published online | 15 October 2020 |
Sensitivity analysis of several operational parameters on gas temperature deviation in a tangential firing boiler
1 Jianghan University, School of Intelligent Manufacturing, 430056 Wuhan, P.R. China
2 Southeast University, School of Energy and Environment, 210096 Nanjing, P.R. China
3 Wuhan Hengxintai Oil Production Equipment Manufacturing Co., Ltd., 430299 Wuhan, P.R. China
* Corresponding author: congy@seu.edu.cn
In this work, an integrated numerical model combining combustion and fluid heating was established for a 660 MW coal-fired boiler. To validate the accuracy of the developed model, related experiment was also conducted, and shows that the relative errors (REs) of several predicted parameters on both flue-gas side and water-steam side of the boiler are less than 7 %, which meets the requirement of analysis. The results indicate that the effect of SOFA tilt angle on gas temperature deviation (GTD) is greatest, and that of SOFA’s proportion follows; while GTD presents a smallest sensitivity to the concentration of O2. This is because O2 concentration mainly affects the average value of the gas temperature, but barely changes its distribution. By contrast, altering SOFA’s tilt angle and its proportion directly varies the shape, location, and area of the high-temperature and low-temperature regions at the entrance profile of the horizontal crossover pass, so these two factors play a more important role in the variation of GTD.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2020
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.