Issue |
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 195, 2020
4th European Conference on Unsaturated Soils (E-UNSAT 2020)
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 03004 | |
Number of page(s) | 5 | |
Section | Experimental Evidence and Techniques | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202019503004 | |
Published online | 16 October 2020 |
Effect of coal on mine tailings’ water permeability and water retention
Priority Research Centre for Geotechnical Science and Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
* Corresponding author: Andrew.vidler@uon.edu.au
For safe and efficient mining operations to occur the management of waste materials is required, which often takes the form of geotechnical structures constructed from this waste. The safe use of these structures requires a number of resources, one of these being sufficient information about the waste material properties. For example, the drying process of a tailings dam is predicted with the water retention and permeability of the tailings. When considering coal tailings, which are comprised of coal and mineral soil particles (typically), the presence of coal may be problematic. The localised hydrophobicity of coal molecules may have a unique effect on water permeability and retention; this is relevant to geotechnical analysis where hydrophilic behaviour is assumed. To explore the possible effect of localised hydrophobicity, mine tailings were obtained from a coal mine of the Hunter Valley, NSW, Australia, and the coal fraction was separated via density separation. After this, three materials were available: unchanged mine tailings and a coal and mineral fraction of tailings. The goal was to characterise the three materials and allow deeper insight on what effect the addition of coal has on retention and hydraulic properties. Characterization involved measuring particle size distribution, pore size distribution, soil water retention curve, and saturated water permeability. The results show that there are distinct differences in the water retention and permeability properties of each material, and a number of these differences could be explained by the differing particle/pore sizes observed in each material. However, the coal containing materials desaturated at low suctions (< 10 kPa) compared to the mineral fraction, which could not be explained by particle/pore size differences and points towards localised hydrophobicity as a possible cause.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences 2020
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.