| Issue |
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 198, 2020
2020 10th Chinese Geosynthetics Conference & International Symposium on Civil Engineering and Geosynthetics (ISCEG 2020)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 02029 | |
| Number of page(s) | 3 | |
| Section | Structural Engineering Monitoring, Control, Repair and Reinforcement | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202019802029 | |
| Published online | 26 October 2020 | |
Comparative study on the results of different tensile test methods of artificial frozen soil
1 CCCC-Tianjin Port Engineering Institute, Ltd., 300222 Tianjin, China
2 CCCC First Harbor Engineering Company, Ltd., 300461 Tianjin, China
3 Key Laboratory of Geotechnical Engineering, Ministry of Communications, 300222 Tianjin, China
4 Key Laboratory of Geotechnical Engineering of Tianjin, 300222 Tianjin, China
5 Tianjin Survey and Design Institute For Water Transport Engineering, 300000 Tianjin, China
Tensile strength of frozen soil is an important index for frozen soil engineering design. It is found that uniaxial tensile strength, three-point bending and four-point bending tensile strength values of frozen soil are inconsistent in the test. For this reason, the meso-level numerical method is adopted, assuming that the meso-level material parameters conform to Weibull distribution, and the damage model is adopted, and the macro-level material properties conform to linear elasticity assumption. Uniaxial tensile test, three-point bending tensile test and four-point bending tensile test are respectively simulated. The results show that the difference comes from the non-uniformity of materials. The results of this paper provide effective guidance for frozen soil strength design.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences 2020
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.