Issue |
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 236, 2021
3rd International Conference on Energy Resources and Sustainable Development (ICERSD 2020)
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 04014 | |
Number of page(s) | 4 | |
Section | Green Technology Innovation and Intelligent Application of Environmental Equipment | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202123604014 | |
Published online | 09 February 2021 |
Can cost sharing contracts coordinate green supply chains based on manufacturers’ overconfidence
College of Modern Economic & Management, Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, 330013 Nanchang Jiangxi, China
* Corresponding author: zhui0471@163.com
Cost sharing contracts is one of the most common contracts to coordinate green supply chains. In this paper, we examine whether it can coordinate green supply chains in the set up of overconfidence. We assume that the manufacturer is overconfident and the retailer is rational. The manufacturer overestimates consumers’ sensitivity to product greenness and accurately estimates the uncertainty of demand. The overconfident manufacturer and the rational retailer cooperate through cost sharing contracts. Then, we construct a game theoretical model to analyze the impact of manufacturers’ overconfident on product greenness, pricing, profit and supply chain cooperation. At last, a numerical experimentation is presented. We find that, (1) the product greenness, wholesale price and retail price increase with the manufacturer’s overconfidence as well as the retailer’s cost sharing proportion. (2) no matter how much the cost sharing proportion is, the profit of manufacturers and retailers decreases with the manufacturer’s overconfidence level. (3) cost sharing contracts can achieve the green supply chain coordination in rational setting. But under manufacturers’ overconfidence, it cannot.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences 2021
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.