Issue |
E3S Web of Conf.
Volume 382, 2023
8th International Conference on Unsaturated Soils (UNSAT 2023)
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 09006 | |
Number of page(s) | 6 | |
Section | Water Retention Curves | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202338209006 | |
Published online | 24 April 2023 |
Water retention curve of clayey sands determined from pore structure by using various methods
Navier, Ecole des Ponts, Univ Gustave Eiffel, CNRS, Marne-la-Vallée, France
Besides standard approaches, the soil water retention curve (SWRC) can be estimated either from pore size distribution obtained by mercury intrusion porosimetry or from the soil freezing characteristic curve. These methods are based on simplified laws such as Young-Laplace for capillary suction or ClausiusClapeyron for cryo-suction. These laws might not be valid for clayey sands where the presence of clay particles would induce other water retention mechanisms. This study aims to assess the clay content's effect on the validity of these two methods in determining the SWRC of clayey sands. Clay sands were prepared at different clay contents by mixing pure sand with kaolin clay prior to compaction at the Proctor maximum dry density. Five clay contents (dry mass of clay divided by dry mass of soil) were considered (0, 5, 10, 15, and 20%). The reference SWRC was obtained by standard suction measurements. The results show that SWRCs estimated from mercury intrusion porosimetry and soil freezing characteristic curve are generally in agreement with the reference SWRC. However, the results obtained by the soil freezing characteristic curve are limited in terms of suction range (500 to 5 MPa) which is not appropriate for clayey sands, while those from mercury intrusion porosimetry show significant discrepancy because of the structure heterogeneity obtained by Proctor compaction.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2023
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.