Issue |
E3S Web of Conf.
Volume 537, 2024
International Scientific and Practical Conference “Sustainable Development of the Environment and Agriculture: Green and Environmental Technologies” (SDEA 2024)
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 08004 | |
Number of page(s) | 11 | |
Section | Digital and Engineering Technologies as a Factor in the Intensive Development of Agriculture | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202453708004 | |
Published online | 13 June 2024 |
Life Cycle Analysis of Energy Storage Technologies: A Comparative Study
1 Department of Mechanical, Gokaraju Lailavathi Womens Engineering College, Bachupally, Hyderabad, India
2 Uttaranchal University, Dehradun, India
3 Centre of Research Impact and Outcome, Chitkara University, Rajpura, India
4 Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, India
5 Chitkara Centre for Research and Development, Chitkara University, Himachal Pradesh, India
6 G D Goenka University, Haryana, India
* Corresponding author: sauravarambol@gmail.com
This study offers a thorough comparative analysis of the life cycle assessment of three significant energy storage technologies—Lithium Ion Batteries, Flow Batteries, and Pumped Hydro—evaluating their environmental, economic, and social aspects in a complete manner. When considering the environmental effect, it is evident that Lithium-Ion Batteries surpass Flow Batteries and Pumped Hydro in terms of carbon footprint, water use, and land utilization. Flow Batteries and Pumped Hydro exhibit significant decreases, ranging from 40% to 60%, showcasing their potential as ecologically sound alternatives with heightened sustainability advantages. From an economic standpoint, it can be confidently said that Flow Batteries and Pumped Hydro surpass Lithium-Ion Batteries in terms of both capital and operational expenses, resulting in a decreased Levelized Cost of Storage (LCOS). The examination of percentage change showcases significant decreases, ranging from 20% to 50%, underscoring the economic competitiveness of Flow Batteries and Pumped Hydro. Regarding societal consequences, Flow Batteries and Pumped Hydro exhibit a propensity for heightened job production, augmented community acceptability, and enhanced health and safety records in contrast to Lithium-Ion Batteries. The assessments of percentage change further underscore the societal benefits of Flow Batteries and Pumped Hydro, demonstrating a substantial increase of 40% to 100% in job creation, a notable rise of 6.25% to 12.5% in community acceptability, and a significant decrease of 50% to 75% in health and safety problems. These results jointly emphasize the comprehensive benefits of Flow Batteries and Pumped Hydro, indicating their potential as sustainable, cost-effective, and socially responsible energy storage options. Given the ongoing evolution of the energy landscape, the findings obtained from this research greatly enhance the ability of stakeholders and policymakers to make well-informed decisions in their efforts to design a more environmentally friendly and robust energy future. The study emphasizes the significance of taking into account not only the technological efficacy, but also the wider environmental, economic, and social circumstances when implementing energy storage technology.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2024
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.