Issue |
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 552, 2024
16th International Conference on Materials Processing and Characterization (ICMPC 2024)
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 01090 | |
Number of page(s) | 9 | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202455201090 | |
Published online | 23 July 2024 |
Comparatively Study of Non-Destructive test with different methods in various curing days
1 Department of Civil Engineering, IES Institute of Technology and Management, IES University, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India 462044.
2 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Aditya Silver Oak Institute of Technology, Silver Oak University, Ahmedabad, Gujarat 38248.
3 Hilla University College, Babylon, Iraq.
4 Department of EEE, GRIET, Bachupally, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
5 Department of Mechanical Engineering, New Horizon College of Engineering, Bangalore, India
6 Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, India.
7 Department of Mechanical Engineering, MLR Institute of Technology, Hyderabad, Telangana, India - 500044
* Corresponding Author: umangparmar.me@socet.edu.in
In non-destructive testing, materials, components, or assemblies are inspected, tested, or evaluated without being destroyed. In nondestructive testing, materials, components, and assemblies are evaluated for quality and integrity without damaging them. The use of non-destructive testing (NDT) is a popular method for assessing the strength and durability of existing concrete structures. An ultrasound pulse velocity test and a rebound hammer test are included in the NDT test. An NDT test includes both ultrasound pulse velocity testing and rebound hammer testing. Strength tests are conducted with rebound hammers, while quality tests are conducted with ultrasonic pulse velocity tests. A lab-made concrete cube was tested on three different ages-seven, fourteen, and 28 days-without destroying it. There were 15 cubes that were treated using non-destructive methods. Using both Schmidt rebound hammer and ultrasonic pulse velocity tests, we determined which non-destructive testing method was faster. In addition to surfaces, Schmidt rebound hammers are the toughest tools to use. Rebound number and concrete strength seem to be connected. Schmidt hammers were employed in both vertical and horizontal settings. Concrete’s ultrasonic pulse velocity is mostly determined by its identity and modulus of elasticity, that are motivated by the substances used in making the concrete in addition to its placement, compaction, and curing techniques.
Key words: Ultrasound pulse velocity / rebound hammer test / Concrete structures / Schmidt rebound hammer / Concrete strength correlation / Surface testing
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2024
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.