Comparative Study Dynamics Analysis of a Multi-story Building with and without a Floating Column

¹ Department of Mechanical Engineering, New Horizon College of Engineering, Bangalore, India.
² Department of CSBS, GRIET, Bachupally, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
³ Department of Mechanical Engineering, ABES Engineering College, Ghaziabad - 201009, UP, India.
⁴ Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, India.
⁵ Lloyd Institute of Engineering & Technology, Knowledge Park II, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India.
⁶ Medical Laboratory Technology Department, College of Medical Technology, The Islamic University, Najaf, Iraq.
⁷ Department of Aeronautical Engineering, MLR Institute of Technology, Hyderabad, Telan gana, India - 500087

^* Corresponding author: hemanthrt21@gmail.com

Abstract

Parking spaces, lobby areas, terrace gardens, and other amenities are highly sought-after in densely populated urban regions. Although floating columns can be useful and an achievable choice, it is important to research their structural performance and cost-effectiveness in the event of substantial ground motion imposed on by an earthquake. A building’s overall dimensions, geometry, and shape all impact how it acts and acts when subjected to seismic loads. For this reason, it is necessary to assess how well floating column buildings perform in seismically vulnerable places in comparison to conventional buildings. In this work, the performance of structures with floating columns for seismic loading is observed using dynamic analytic techniques in accordance with IS 1893 (2005). This study analyses both the floating columns and the conventional building without floating columns. When compared to a regular building, the research reveals that the floating column buildings exhibit a very quick increase in base shear and story displacement. The horizontal displacements experienced by floating column buildings are proportionally larger due to an increase in the fundamental time period. If the lateral displacement exceeds the codespecified maximum limit, damage to structural and non-structural parts may result. Because of the discontinuity in the load distribution path, seismic base shear and overturning moment are also increasing in the case of buildings with floating columns. Additionally, while asymmetrically introducing floating columns, torsional irregularity has been produced but the modal mass participation ratio has decreased. While it is true that the use of floating columns in high-rise structures allows for continuous open floor plans, they are also dangerous and susceptible in seismically active locations