| Issue |
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 656, 2025
2025 6th International Conference on Urban Engineering and Management Science (ICUEMS 2025)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 01004 | |
| Number of page(s) | 5 | |
| Section | Urban Infrastructure and Safety | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202565601004 | |
| Published online | 30 October 2025 | |
Comparative Analysis of Passive Fire Protection Methods for High-Rise Buildings: Intumescent Coatings vs. Fire-Resistant Boards
China Nuclear Power Engineering Co.LTD, Beijing, 100840, China
Fire safety in high-rise buildings represents a fundamental aspect of structural engineering, particularly with respect to ensuring the thermal stability of steel frameworks under fire exposure. This study presents a comparative analysis of two prevalent passive fire protection (PFP) strategies—intumescent coatings and fire-resistant boards—evaluating their thermal performance, cost efficiency, and environmental implications. A systematic comparative framework was established, incorporating thermal simulations under standardized fire conditions, cost modeling on a per-unit-area basis, and quantitative assessment of volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions. The results indicate that intumescent coatings exhibit superior thermal insulation during the initial phase of fire exposure, whereas fire-resistant boards provide more sustained thermal resistance at a comparatively lower cost. Nonetheless, the higher VOC emissions associated with coatings may pose concerns regarding indoor air quality. The study concludes with evidence-based recommendations tailored to specific application scenarios, providing guidance for the optimized selection of passive fire protection materials in future high-rise construction practices.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2025
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.

