| Issue |
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 672, 2025
The 17th ROOMVENT Conference (ROOMVENT 2024)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 05003 | |
| Number of page(s) | 8 | |
| Section | Special Applications | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202567205003 | |
| Published online | 05 December 2025 | |
Case study of ventilation solutions and strategies for Li-ion battery rooms
1 Dept. of Architecture, Materials and Structures, SINTEF Community, Trondheim, Norway
2 Dept. of Architectural Engineering, SINTEF Community, Oslo, Norway
* Corresponding author: brynhild.olso@sintef.no
Integrating renewable energy sources (RES) is crucial to achieve a carbon-neutral society. Using new or second-life Li-ion batteries (LIB) as energy storage is recognized as the most realistic solution to drive wider adoption and effective utilization of RES. However, the use of battery energy storage systems (BESS) inside buildings may bring significant potential risks, particularly in the case of fire. LIB fires develop differently than fires caused by other sources as they can undergo rapid thermal runaway releasing explosive and toxic gases and fumes. Furthermore, there is a lack of regulations and guidelines describing the requirements for establishing a battery room within or outside buildings. In this paper, results from an initial mapping of ventilation solutions and strategies for smoke extraction in battery rooms for BESS located in different buildings categories in Norway are presented. A case study involving six existing battery rooms has been performed to investigate design vulnerabilities and identify knowledge gaps with respect to ventilation and other active fire protection measures. Results from the mapping indicate large differences in the design of ventilation systems and strategies implemented in existing battery rooms.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2025
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.

