| Issue |
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 675, 2025
International Scientific Conference on Geosciences and Environmental Management (GeoME’5.5 2025)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 01018 | |
| Number of page(s) | 7 | |
| Section | Smart and Sustainable Materials, Energy and Environmental Systems | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202567501018 | |
| Published online | 11 December 2025 | |
Refining Wind Power Assessment in Essaouira, Morocco: The Comparison Study for Four Methods for Weibull Distribution Parameter Estimation
1 LASTIMI Laboratory Systems Analysis Information Processing and Industrial Management Higher School of Technology, Mohammed V University Rabat, Morocco
2 LPFAS Laboratory of Fundamental and Applied Physics, Polydisciplinary Faculty of Safi, Cadi Ayyad University, Morocco.
3 Electrical Engineering Department of High School of Technical Education (ENSET), Mohammed V University, BP 6207 Rabat, Morocco
* Corresponding author: najouamrabet2@gmail.com
Quantitatively modelling wind speeds at a given location is necessary optimize wind power use for energy system planning purposes and assist in selecting structural material for wind turbine designs. This research analysed whether probability distribution functions (PDFs) approximate wind speeds within the means of renewable energy engineering and materials performance. Four techniques were analysed: Lysen empirical method (EML), Justus method (EMJ), a graphical method (GRAPH), and the four-moment mixture method (MFMM). The four techniques estimate the two Weibull parameters, k (shape) and c (scale), which are used to describe how the wind behaves structurally, predict the loads on the structures, and guide materials for durability of turbine component parts. The data set included one year's worth of wind speed collections for Essaouira, Morocco, which has an extensive coastal history of high wind speeds. All parameter estimations and other calculations were performed using MATLAB. The accuracy of the techniques and comparisons of accuracy were evaluated using statistical measures, including RMSE, Chi- square (χ2), MAE, and R2. The findings indicate the strengths and weaknesses for all four methods, including considerations for selecting the best method to analyse prototype wind speed data in both energy engineering applications and materials-based design.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2025
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.

