| Issue |
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 677, 2025
The 3rd International Conference on Disaster Mitigation and Management (3rd ICDMM 2025)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 01004 | |
| Number of page(s) | 6 | |
| Section | Risk-Based Disaster Analysis for Regional Development and Spatial Planning | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202567701004 | |
| Published online | 12 December 2025 | |
Influence of slope geometry variations on factor of safety: Comparative analysis of limit equilibrium and finite element method
1 Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Riau, 28292, Pekanbaru, Riau, Indonesia
2 Department of Forestry, Universitas Papua, 98314, Manokwari, Papua Barat, Indonesia
3 Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, 94300 Samarahan, Sarawak, Malaysia.
4 Department of Civil Engineering, Politeknik Negeri Padang, 21562, Padang, Sumatera Barat, Indonesia
* Corresponding author: merley.misriani@eng.unri.ac.id
Landslides frequently occur in tropical regions with variable topography and rainfall, where slope geometry significantly influences stability. This study analyzes the effect of slope height and angle variations on the Factor of Safety (FS) using two analytical approaches: the Limit Equilibrium Method (LEM) with the Bishop Simplified model and the Finite Element Method (FEM) employing the strength reduction technique. Field measurements were conducted on excavated slopes at the Derofizha Permata Indrapuri Housing Complex, Pekanbaru, characterized by 2.62–4.8 m elevations and 49°–84° slopes under layered soil conditions. Results show that FS decreases with increasing slope height and angle. FEM consistently provides lower FS values than LEM, particularly for slopes higher than 3 m or steeper than 70°, indicating critical to unstable conditions (FS < 1.25). The presence of soft clayey silt layers near the surface further reduces stability. FEM offers more conservative and realistic predictions of potential failure surfaces, while LEM remains effective for preliminary assessments. The findings emphasize the need to integrate geometric variability and soil stratification in slope stability analyses, supporting more reliable risk mitigation and safer housing development in landslide-prone areas.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2025
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.

