Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 7, 2016
3rd European Conference on Flood Risk Management (FLOODrisk 2016)
Article Number 03002
Number of page(s) 12
Section Performance and behaviour of flood defences
Published online 20 October 2016
  1. USACE, Institute for Water Resources (2010). Exploration of Tolerable Risk Guidelines for the USACE Levee Safety Program. IWR Workshop Proceedings, Washington, DC.
  2. Needham J T, Seda-Sanabria Y, Bowles D S (2010). Consequence Estimation for Critical Infrastructure Risk Management. Proceedings of US Society on Dams Conference, Sacramento, California, USA.
  3. US Bureau of Reclamation and US Army Corps of Engineers (2015). Best Practices in Dam and Levee Safety Risk Analysis. Accessed at
  4. Morris M W, Hassan M A A M, Wahl T L, Tejral R D, Hanson G J, Temple D M (2012). Evaluation and Development of Physically-Based Embankment Breach Models. Report of the Dam Safety Interest Group for CEATI International.
  5. ASCE/EWRI Task Committee on Dam/Levee Breaching, Weiming Wu, Chairman (2011). Earthen Embankment Breaching. J of Hydraulic Engineering, 137, 1549–1564. [CrossRef]
  6. Kakinuma T and Yasuyuki S (2014). Large-Scale Experiment and Numerical Modeling of a Riverine Levee Breach. J of Hydraulic Engineering, accessed online, ISSN: 0733-9429/04014039(9).
  7. Brunner G W (2015). HEC-RAS River Analysis System Hydraulic Reference Manual. US Army Corps of Engineers Software Documentation for HEC-RAS 5.0. CPD 69.
  8. Hanson G J, Temple D M, Morris M, Hassan M, Cook K (2005). Simplified Breach Analysis Model for Homogeneous Embankments: Part II, Parameter Inputs and Variable Scale Model Comparisons. Proceedings of US Society on Dams Conference, Technologies to Enhance Dam Safety and the Environment, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, 163-174.
  9. Wu W (2015). Introduction to DL Breach – A Simplified Physically-Based Dam/Levee Breach Model (Draft). Clarkson University, 2015.7
  10. Wu W (2013). Simplified Physically Based Model of Earthen Embankment Breaching. J of Hydraulic Engineering, 139(8), 837–851. [CrossRef]
  11. Visser P J (1998) Breach Growth in Sand-Dikes. Dissertation for Doctorate at Technical University of Delft, the Netherlands.
  12. Zhu Y (2006) Breach Growth in Clay-Dikes. Dissertation for Doctorate at Technical University of Delft, the Netherlands.
  13. Hassan M A A M and Morris M W (2008). HR BREACH Help File, HR Wallingford, v1.1.
  14. Hanson G J, Temple D M, Hunt S L, Tejral R D (2011). Development and Characterization of Soil Material Parameters for Embankment Breach. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 27(4), 587–595. [CrossRef]
  15. USDA-ARS (2011). WinDAM B Dam Overtopping Model, Software Documentation for WinDAM B, V1.0.0.
  16. Visser K, Tejral R D, and Neilsen M L (2015). WinDAM C Earthen Embankment Internal Erosion Analysis Software. Proceedings of the 3rd Interagency Conference on Sedimentation and Hydrologic Modeling, Reno, Nevada, USA.
  17. Wu W (2016). Personal Communication with Author.
  18. Wahl T L (2004). Uncertainty of Predictions of Embankment Dam Breach Parameters. J of Hydraulic Engineering, 130(5), 389–397. [CrossRef]
  19. Long R (2016). Personal Communication with Author. Former RD 1660 General Manager, Ronald Long.
  20. USACE, Sacramento District (1997). Collection of Emergency Situation Reports and Emergency Repair Design Documents. Unpublished.
  21. Flood Emergency Action Team (1997). Final Report. Governor’s Task Force on 1997 Flooding in California.
  22. Moses D (2015). Personal Communication with Author. Geotechnical Investigator of Hamburg Levee Failure, Omaha District, USACE.
  23. Blankers L (2015). Personal Communication with Author. Hydraulic Investigator of Hamburg Levee Failure, Omaha District, USACE.
  24. Hanson G J and Simon A (2001). Erodibility of Cohesive Streambeds in the Loess Area of the Midwestern USA. Hydrological Processes,15, 23–38. [CrossRef]
  25. Wu W and Perera C (2015). Erosion of Mixed Cohesive and Non-Cohesive Sediments. Final Report on laboratory experiments submitted to US Army Engineer Research and Development Center.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.