Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 7, 2016
3rd European Conference on Flood Risk Management (FLOODrisk 2016)
Article Number 03002
Number of page(s) 12
Section Performance and behaviour of flood defences
Published online 20 October 2016
  1. USACE, Institute for Water Resources (2010). Exploration of Tolerable Risk Guidelines for the USACE Levee Safety Program. IWR Workshop Proceedings, Washington, DC. [Google Scholar]
  2. Needham J T, Seda-Sanabria Y, Bowles D S (2010). Consequence Estimation for Critical Infrastructure Risk Management. Proceedings of US Society on Dams Conference, Sacramento, California, USA. [Google Scholar]
  3. US Bureau of Reclamation and US Army Corps of Engineers (2015). Best Practices in Dam and Levee Safety Risk Analysis. Accessed at [Google Scholar]
  4. Morris M W, Hassan M A A M, Wahl T L, Tejral R D, Hanson G J, Temple D M (2012). Evaluation and Development of Physically-Based Embankment Breach Models. Report of the Dam Safety Interest Group for CEATI International. [Google Scholar]
  5. ASCE/EWRI Task Committee on Dam/Levee Breaching, Weiming Wu, Chairman (2011). Earthen Embankment Breaching. J of Hydraulic Engineering, 137, 1549–1564. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kakinuma T and Yasuyuki S (2014). Large-Scale Experiment and Numerical Modeling of a Riverine Levee Breach. J of Hydraulic Engineering, accessed online, ISSN: 0733-9429/04014039(9). [Google Scholar]
  7. Brunner G W (2015). HEC-RAS River Analysis System Hydraulic Reference Manual. US Army Corps of Engineers Software Documentation for HEC-RAS 5.0. CPD 69. [Google Scholar]
  8. Hanson G J, Temple D M, Morris M, Hassan M, Cook K (2005). Simplified Breach Analysis Model for Homogeneous Embankments: Part II, Parameter Inputs and Variable Scale Model Comparisons. Proceedings of US Society on Dams Conference, Technologies to Enhance Dam Safety and the Environment, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, 163-174. [Google Scholar]
  9. Wu W (2015). Introduction to DL Breach – A Simplified Physically-Based Dam/Levee Breach Model (Draft). Clarkson University, 2015.7 [Google Scholar]
  10. Wu W (2013). Simplified Physically Based Model of Earthen Embankment Breaching. J of Hydraulic Engineering, 139(8), 837–851. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Visser P J (1998) Breach Growth in Sand-Dikes. Dissertation for Doctorate at Technical University of Delft, the Netherlands. [Google Scholar]
  12. Zhu Y (2006) Breach Growth in Clay-Dikes. Dissertation for Doctorate at Technical University of Delft, the Netherlands. [Google Scholar]
  13. Hassan M A A M and Morris M W (2008). HR BREACH Help File, HR Wallingford, v1.1. [Google Scholar]
  14. Hanson G J, Temple D M, Hunt S L, Tejral R D (2011). Development and Characterization of Soil Material Parameters for Embankment Breach. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 27(4), 587–595. [Google Scholar]
  15. USDA-ARS (2011). WinDAM B Dam Overtopping Model, Software Documentation for WinDAM B, V1.0.0. [Google Scholar]
  16. Visser K, Tejral R D, and Neilsen M L (2015). WinDAM C Earthen Embankment Internal Erosion Analysis Software. Proceedings of the 3rd Interagency Conference on Sedimentation and Hydrologic Modeling, Reno, Nevada, USA. [Google Scholar]
  17. Wu W (2016). Personal Communication with Author. [Google Scholar]
  18. Wahl T L (2004). Uncertainty of Predictions of Embankment Dam Breach Parameters. J of Hydraulic Engineering, 130(5), 389–397. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Long R (2016). Personal Communication with Author. Former RD 1660 General Manager, Ronald Long. [Google Scholar]
  20. USACE, Sacramento District (1997). Collection of Emergency Situation Reports and Emergency Repair Design Documents. Unpublished. [Google Scholar]
  21. Flood Emergency Action Team (1997). Final Report. Governor’s Task Force on 1997 Flooding in California. [Google Scholar]
  22. Moses D (2015). Personal Communication with Author. Geotechnical Investigator of Hamburg Levee Failure, Omaha District, USACE. [Google Scholar]
  23. Blankers L (2015). Personal Communication with Author. Hydraulic Investigator of Hamburg Levee Failure, Omaha District, USACE. [Google Scholar]
  24. Hanson G J and Simon A (2001). Erodibility of Cohesive Streambeds in the Loess Area of the Midwestern USA. Hydrological Processes,15, 23–38. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Wu W and Perera C (2015). Erosion of Mixed Cohesive and Non-Cohesive Sediments. Final Report on laboratory experiments submitted to US Army Engineer Research and Development Center. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.