Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 7, 2016
3rd European Conference on Flood Risk Management (FLOODrisk 2016)
Article Number 08006
Number of page(s) 9
Section Vulnerability and societal resilience
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20160708006
Published online 20 October 2016
  1. Scheuer, S., Haase, D., & Meyer, V. (2011). Exploring multicriteria flood vulnerability by integrating economic, social and ecological dimensions of flood risk and coping capacity: from a starting point view towards an end point view of vulnerability. Natural Hazards, 58(2), 731–751. [CrossRef]
  2. Birkmann, J. (2006). Measuring vulnerability to promote disaster-resilient societies: Conceptual frameworks and definitions. Measuring vulnerability to natural hazards: Towards disaster resilient societies., 1, 9–54
  3. United Nations (2005). Hyogo Framework for Action 2005–2015: Building the Resilience of Nations and Communities to Disasters, World Conference on Disaster Reduction, 18–22 January 2005, Kobe, Hyogo
  4. Fuchs, S., Birkmann, J., & Glade, T. (2012). Vulnerability assessment in natural hazard and risk analysis: current approaches and future challenges. Natural Hazards, 1–7.
  5. Reghezza, M. (2006). Réflexions autour de la vulnérabilité métropolitaine: la métropole parisienne face au risque de crue centennale, Thèse de doctorat, Université de Nanterre-Paris X.
  6. Sansévérino-Godfrin, V. (2008). Le Cadre juridique de la gestion des risque naturels. Paris: Éditions Tec & Doc, Éditions Lavoisier, coll. « Sciences du risqué et du danger », 70 p.
  7. Hewitt, K., (1983). Interpretation of Calamity from the Viewpoint of Human Ecology, Allen and Unwin, Londres, 304 p
  8. White, G. F. (1974). Natural Hazards: Local, National, Global, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 288 p.
  9. Fabiani, J.-L. et Theys, J. (1987). La société vulnérable : évaluer et maîtriser les risques, Presses de l’École normale supérieure, Paris, 674 p.
  10. Thouret, J. C., & D’ercole, R. (1996). Vulnérabilité aux risques naturels en milieu urbain: effets, facteurs et réponses sociales. Cahiers des sciences humaines. ORSTOM, 32(2), 407–422.
  11. Ledoux, B. (2006). La gestion du risque inondation. Éditions Tec & Doc.
  12. De León, V., & Carlos, J. (2006). Vulnerability: a conceptional and methodological review. UNU-EHS.
  13. Barroca, B. (2006). Risque et vulnerabilities territoriales: Les inondations en milieu urbain, Doctoral dissertation, Université de Marne la Vallée, Génie urbain-aménagement de l’espace, urbanisme).
  14. Brooks, N., 2003, « Vulnerability, Risk and Adaptation: A Conceptual Framework », http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk/~e118/publications/Brooks-tynWP.pdf.
  15. Gallopín, G. C. (2006). Linkages between vulnerability, resilience, and adaptive capacity. Global environmental change, 16(3), pp 293–303. [CrossRef]
  16. Gleyze, J. F. (2002). Introduction au risque. Rapport interne de l ‘IGN.
  17. Léone, F. (2007). Caractérisation des vulnerabilities aux catastrophes naturelles: contribution à une évaluation géographique multirisque, HDR, université de Montpellier III, Montpellier, 2007.
  18. Miller, F., Osbahr, H., Boyd, E., Thomalla, F., Bharawani, S., Ziervogel, G., ... & Hinkel, J. (2010). Resilience and vulnerability: complementary or conflicting concepts?. Ecology and Society, 15(3).
  19. Djament-Tran, G., Le Blanc, A., Lhomme, S., Reghezza-Zitt, M., & Rufat, S. (2012). Ce que la résilience n’est pas, ce qu’on essaye de lui faire dire. Mars, hal-00679293, version, 1-15.
  20. Smit, B., & Wandel, J. (2006). Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability. Global environmental change, 16(3), 282–292. [CrossRef]
  21. Gérin, S. (2011). Méthodologie d’évaluation des PPRN dans le contexte de l’assurance des catastrophes naturelles, Thèse de doctorat, Université Paris 7 - Paris Diderot, UMR 8586 PRODIG
  22. Nussbaum, R. (2015). Involving public private partnerships as building blocks for integrated natural catastrophes country risk management-Sharing on the French national experiences of economic instruments integrated with information and knowledge management tools. IDRiM Journal, 5(2), 82–100.
  23. AFA (2015), Synthèse de l’étude changement climatique et assurance, Risques climatiques : quells impacts sur l’assurance contre les aléas naturels à l’horizon 2040 ?, 29p.
  24. GIEC, 2014: Changements climatiques 2014: Rapport de synthèse. Contribution des Groupes de travail I, II et III au cinquième Rapport d’évaluation du Groupe d’experts intergouvernemental sur l’évolution du climat [Sous la direction de R.K. Pachauri et L.A. Meyer]. GIEC, Genève, Suisse, 161p.
  25. Field, C.B. (2012). Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation: special report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press.
  26. D’Ercole, R. et alii, 1994, « Les vulnérabilités des sociétés et des espaces urbanisés : concepts, typologie, modèles d’analyse », Revue de Géographie Alpine, vol. 82, no 4, p. 87–96. [CrossRef]
  27. Steinführer, A., De Marchi, B., Kuhlicke, C., Scolobig, A., Tapsell, S., & Tunstall, S. (2009). Vulnerability, resilience and social constructions of flood risk in exposed communities. FLOODsite report T11-07-1 2, http://www.floodsite.net.
  28. André, C. (2013). Analyse des dommages liés aux submersions marines et évaluation des coûts induits aux habitations à partir de données d’assurance: perspectives apportées par les tempêtes Johanna (2008) et Xynthia (2010)(Doctoral dissertation, Université de Bretagne occidentale-Brest).
  29. Bourguignon, D. (2014), Évènements et territoires – Le coût des inondations en France, Analyse spatiotemporelle des dommages assurés, Thèse de doctorat, 310p.
  30. Birkmann, J., & Wisner, B. (2006). « Measuring the unmeasurable. The challenge of vulnerability. » UNUEHS Source, 5.
  31. Kasperson, R.E., Dow, K., Archer, E., Caceres, D., Downing, T.,Elmqvist, T., Eriksen, S., Folke, C., Han, G., Iyengar, K., Vogel, C., Wilson, K., Ziervogel, G., 2005. Vulnerable people and places. In:Hassan, R., Scholes, R., Ash, N. (Eds.), Ecosystems and Human Wellbeing:Current State and Trends, vol. 1. Island Press, Washington, DC,pp. 143–164.
  32. Turner, B. L., Kasperson, R. E., Matson, P. A., McCarthy, J. J., Corell, R. W., Christensen, L., ... & Polsky, C. (2003). A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 100(14), 8074–8079. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Chemitte, J. (2008), Adoption des technologies de l’information géographique et gestion des connaissances dans les organisations. Application à l’industrie de l’assurance pour la gestion des risqué naturels, Doctoral dissertation, 260p.
  34. Cardona, O. D. (2004). « The need for rethinking the concepts of vulnerability and risk from a holistic perspective: a necessary review and criticism for effective risk management », Mapping vulnerability: Disasters, development and people, 37–51.
  35. UN/ISDR-International Strategy for Disaster Reduction- (2002): Living with Risk: A Global Review of Disaster Reduction Initiatives, Geneva: UN Publications.
  36. Ashley, R., Blanksby, J., Maguire, T., & Leahy, T. (2010). Frameworks for adapting to flood risk: experiences from the EU‟ s flood resilient city project, International Association for Hydro-Environment Engineering and Research (IAHR).
  37. Hegger, D. L. T., Green, C., Driessen, P. P. J., Bakker, M. H., Dieperink, C., Crabbé, A., ...& Fournier, M. (2013). Flood Risk Management in Europe: Similarities and Differences between the STAR-FLOOD consortium countries.
  38. Steinführer, A. (2009). Local communities at risk from flooding: social vulnerability, resilience and recommendations for flood risk management in Europe. Helmholtz-Zentrum für Umweltforschung, Department Stadt-und Umweltsoziologie.
  39. Larrue, C., Bruzzone, S., Lévy, L., Gralepois, M., Schellenberger, T., Trémorin, J.B., Fournier, M., Manson, C., Thuilier, T, (2015.) Analysing and evaluating Flood Risk Governance in France: from State Policy to Local Strategies T, French STARFLOOD Team, Tours, France.
  40. Dourlens, C. (2003). La question des inondations : le prisme des sciences sociales. Rapport au Ministère de l’équipement, des Transports et du Logement (DRAST)
  41. Mény, Y., Thoenig, J.C. (1989) Politiques publiques. Collection Thémis Science Politique PUF, 391 p.
  42. Huitema, D., Mostert, E., Egas, W., Moellenkamp, S., Pahl-Wostl, C., and Yalcin, R.. 2009. Adaptive water governance: assessing the institutional prescriptions of adaptive (co-)management from a governance perspective and defining a research agenda. Ecology and Society 14(1): 26. [CrossRef]
  43. Charry, J. C., & Ministère de l’Aménagement du Territoire et de l’Environnement France. (1997). Plans de prévention des risques naturels prévisibles (PPR): Guide général. La Documentation Francaise.
  44. Grelot, F. (2004), Gestion collective des inondations, peut-on tenir compte de l’avis de la population dans la phase d’évaluation économique a priori, Doctoral dissertation, 391p.
  45. FEMA-Federal Emergency Management Agency-(2015). National Flood Insurance Program Community Rating System: 2014 Biennial Report to Congress 24 pp.
  46. NFIP-National Flood Insurance Program, (1989). Report on the Activity Weighting Forum. 23 pp.
  47. Renard, F. (2010). Le risque pluvial en milieu urbain: de la caractérisation de l’aléa à l’évaluation de la vulnérabilité: le cas du Grand Lyon, Thèse de doctorat, Lyon 3
  48. Saaty, T. L., & Ergu, D. (2015). When is a Decision-Making Method Trustworthy? Criteria for Evaluating Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 1–17.
  49. Huang, I. B., Keisler, J., & Linkov, I. (2011). Multicriteria decision analysis in environmental sciences: ten years of applications and trends. Science of the total environment, 409(19), 3578–3594. [CrossRef]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.