Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 7, 2016
3rd European Conference on Flood Risk Management (FLOODrisk 2016)
Article Number 08007
Number of page(s) 8
Section Vulnerability and societal resilience
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20160708007
Published online 20 October 2016
  1. Egli T. (2002) Non Structural Flood Plain Management: Measures and their Effectiveness, International Commission for the Protection of the Rhine (ICPR), Koblenz, Germany. [Google Scholar]
  2. Lasage R., Veldkamp T. I. E., De Moel H., Van T. C., Phi H. L., Vellinga P. and Aerts J. (2014) Assessment of the effectiveness of flood adaptation strategies for HCMC. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 14, 1441–1457. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Kreibich H., Thieken A., Müller M. and Merz B. (2005) Precautionary measures reduce flood losses of households and companies—insights from the 2002 flood in Saxony, Germany. Floods Def. Manag. 851–859. [Google Scholar]
  4. Kron W. (2005) Flood risk = hazard center dot values center dot vulnerability. Water Int. 30, 58–68. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. UNISDR. (2009) 2009 UNISDR Terminology on Disaster Risk Reduction, United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction, United Nations, Geneva, Switzerland. [Google Scholar]
  6. Birkmann J. (2006) Measuring Vulnerability to Natural Hazards: Towards Disaster Resilient, Societies. New York: United Nations Publications. [Google Scholar]
  7. Füssel H.-M. (2007) Vulnerability: A generally applicable conceptual framework for climate change research. Glob. Environ. Change 17, 155–167. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hufschmidt G. (2011) A comparative analysis of several vulnerability concepts. Nat. Hazards 58, 621–643. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Fuchs S., Heiss K. and Hübl J. (2007) Towards an empirical vulnerability function for use in debris flow risk assessment. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 7, 495–506. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Wallingford. HR (2000) National appraisal of assets at risk from flooding and coastal erosion, DEFRA. [Google Scholar]
  11. Sayers P. B., Hall J. W. and Meadowcroft I. C. (2002) Towards risk-based flood hazard management in the UK. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng.-Civ. Eng. 150, 36–42. [Google Scholar]
  12. Hall J. W., Dawson R. J., Sayers P. B., Rosu C., Chatterton J. B. and Deakin R. (2003) A methodology for national-scale flood risk assessment. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng.-Water Marit. Eng. 156, 235–247. [Google Scholar]
  13. Kok M., Huizinga H. J., Vrouwenfelder A. C. W. M. and Berendregt A. (2004) Damage and casualties caused by flooding, Highways and Hydraulics Engineering Department. [Google Scholar]
  14. Meyer V. and Messner F. (2005) National Flood Damage Evaluation - Methods A Review of Applied Methods in England, the Netherlands, the Czech Republic and Germany. UFZ-Diskuss. 212005. [Google Scholar]
  15. Varnes D. J. (1984) Landslide hazard zonation: a review of principles and practice. [Google Scholar]
  16. Fell R. (1994) Landslide risk assessment and acceptable risk. Can. Geotech. J. 31, 261–272. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Regione Sicilia. (2004) Piano Stralcio di bacino per l’Assetto Idrogeologico della Regione Siciliana–Relazione Generale. [Google Scholar]
  18. Aronica G., Tucciarelli T. and Nasello C. (1998) 2D multilevel model for flood wave propagation in flood-affected areas. J. Water Resour. Plan. Manag. 124, 210–217. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Chen A. S., Hammond M. J., Djordjević S., Butler D., Khan D. M. and Veerbeek W. (2016) From hazard to impact: the flood damage assessment tools for mega cities. Nat. Hazards in press. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.