Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 7, 2016
3rd European Conference on Flood Risk Management (FLOODrisk 2016)
Article Number 12003
Number of page(s) 12
Section Long-term protection and prevention measures
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20160712003
Published online 20 October 2016
  1. Peltier A. (2008). La cartographie réglementaire des risques naturels en Suisse, en Italie et en France. La mise en carte des risques naturels, Diversité des approches, Montpellier, Presses Universitaires de la Méditerranée, Géorisques, n°2, pp. 61–67. [In French]. [Google Scholar]
  2. Beck E. (2006). Approche multi - risques en milieu urbain - Le cas des risques sismique et technologiques dans l’agglomération de Mulhouse (Haut‐Rhin). PhD Thesis. University Strasbourg I (Louis Pasteur), 283 p. [In French]. [Google Scholar]
  3. Ministry of territorial planning and environment, ministry of equipment, transport and housing. (1997). Plans de prévention des risques naturels prévisibles (PPR): Guide général, La Documentation française, 76 p. [In French]. [Google Scholar]
  4. Ministry of territorial planning and environment, Ministry of equipment, transport and housing. (1999). Plans de prévention des risques naturels prévisibles de mouvement de terrain: Guide méthodologique, La Documentation française, 72 p. [In French]. [Google Scholar]
  5. Ministry of territorial planning and environment, Ministry of equipment, transport and housing. (1999). Plans de prévention des risques naturels d’inondation: Guide méthodologique, La Documentation française, 126 p. [In French]. [Google Scholar]
  6. Ministry of ecology, sustainable development and energy (2015). Plan de prévention des risques naturels d’avalanche: Guide méthodologique, General Direction of Risk Prevention, 103 p. [In French]. [Google Scholar]
  7. Brugnot C. and Cassayre Y. (2002). De la politique française de restauration des terrains en montagne à la prévention des risques naturels. In Les pouvoirs publics face aux risques naturels dans l’histoire, pp. 261–272. [In French]. [Google Scholar]
  8. Margreth S. and Romang H. (2010). Effectiveness of mitigation measures against natural hazards. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 64(2), pp. 199–207. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Liévois J. and Choznacki E. (2011). Enquête sur la place donnée aux ouvrages de prévention /protection dans les PPR approuvés pour lesquels les services RTM sont intervenus. Service de restauration des terrains de montagne (RTM), 11 p. [In French]. [Google Scholar]
  10. Meunier M. (1994). Les progrès de la connaissance et les méthodes d’étude des phénomènes torrentiels. La Houille Blanche, 3, pp. 25–31. [In French]. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gavrilovic Z., Stefanovic M., Milovanovic I., Cotric J. and Milojevic M. (2008). Torrent Classification – Base of Rational Management of Erosive Regions, Institute for the Development of Water Resources, 9 p. [Google Scholar]
  12. Aulitzky H. (1982). Preliminary two-fold classification of torrents. Mitt. Forstl. Bundes- Versuchsanst. Wien, 144, pp. 243–256. [Google Scholar]
  13. Meunier M. (1991). Eléments d’hydraulique torrentielle. CEMAGREF, Etud. Sér. Montagne 1, pp. 1–278. [In French]. [Google Scholar]
  14. Blair T.C. and McPherson J.G. (1994). Alluvial fans and their natural distinction from rivers based on morphology, hydraulic processes, sedimentary processes, and facies assemblages. J. Sediment. Res. A64(3), pp. 450–489. [Google Scholar]
  15. Pierson T. C. (2005). Hyperconcentrated flow - transitional process between water flow and debris flow. Chapter 8 in Jakob, Matthias, and Hungr, Oldrich (eds), Debris-flow Hazards and Related Phenomena: Springer/Praxis, Chichester, UK, pp. 159–202. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Koulinski V. (1993). Etude de la formation d’un lit torrentiel par confrontation d’essais sur modèle réduit et d’observations de terrain. PhD Thesis. University Joseph Fourier – Grenoble I, pp. 17–18. [In French]. [Google Scholar]
  17. Tacnet J-M. (2009). Prise en compte de l’incertitude dans l’expertise des risques naturels en montagne par analyse multicritères et fusion d’information. Environmental Sciences. Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Saint-Etienne. [In French]. [Google Scholar]
  18. Ancey C. (2001). Debris flows and related phenomena. In Geomorphological fluid mechanics, Balmforth N.J. and Provenzale A. (Eds.): LNP 582, pp. 528–547. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hübl J., Strauss A., Holub M. and Suda J. (2005). Structural mitigation measures. In Proceedings zum 3rd Probabilistic Workshop: Technical Systems + Natural Hazards, 12 p. [Google Scholar]
  20. Zollinger F. (1985). Debris detention basins in the European Alps, International Symposium on Erosion, Debris Flow and Disaster Prevention, Tsukuba, Japan, pp. 433–438. [Google Scholar]
  21. Tacnet J-M, Curt C., Rey B. and Richard D. (2012). Efficiency assessment for torrent protection works – An approach based on safety and reliability analysis, 12th Congress Interpraevent, 11 p. [Google Scholar]
  22. PPR of the municipality of Bramans, Savoie. (2014): detailed report, hazard map, land-use map, regulation. [Google Scholar]
  23. PPR of the municipality of La-Salle-les-Alpes, Hautes-Alpes. (2009): detailed report, hazard map, land-use map, regulation. [Google Scholar]
  24. Piton G., Carladous S., Recking A., Tacnet J-M., Liebault F., Kuss D., Quefféléan Y. and Marco O. (Sub. to). Why do we build check dams? An historical perspective from the French experience. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 23 p. [Google Scholar]
  25. Piton G. and Recking A. (2015). Design of sediment traps with open check dams. I: Hydraulic and deposition processes, Journal of Hydraulic Engineering (ASCE), 16 p. [Google Scholar]
  26. Hübl J. and Suda J. (2008). Debris flow mitigation measures in Austria, in: Sevkavgiprovodkhoz Institute (Ed.), Debris Flows Disasters, Risk, Forecast, Protection. Pyatigorsk., pp 27–30. [Google Scholar]
  27. Tacnet J.-M., Richard D., Dezert J. and Batton- Hubert M. (2010). Decision support and information fusion for expert assessment of natural risks: analysis of the efficiency of civil engineering protection works, Proceedings of the 6th JFMS Conf., pp. 24–26. [In French]. [Google Scholar]
  28. Carladous S., Tacnet J.-M., Eckert N., Curt C. and Batton-Hubert M. (2014). Vers une analyse intégrée de l’efficacité des ouvrages de protection contre les risques naturels en montagne: évaluation économique en complément des volets structurels et fonctionnels. Proceedings of the 8th JFMS Conf., pp 61–72. [In French]. [Google Scholar]
  29. Vidaud-Barral L., Deschâtres M., Bonnefoy M. and Richard D. (2010). Improving the interoperability and user-friendliness of the French snow avalanche information systems, International Snow Science Workshop (ISSW), Squaw Valley, Colorado, USA, pp. 17–22. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.