Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 7, 2016
3rd European Conference on Flood Risk Management (FLOODrisk 2016)
Article Number 15004
Number of page(s) 15
Section Public education and engagement
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20160715004
Published online 20 October 2016
  1. Environment Agency (2009) Flooding in England: A national assessment of flood risk. Bristol: Environment Agency. [Google Scholar]
  2. Environment Agency (2009) Flooding in Wales: A national assessment of flood risk. Bristol: Environment Agency. [Google Scholar]
  3. DEFRA (2012) Floods and Coastal Erosion. London: Defra. [Google Scholar]
  4. Milly P.C.D., Wetherald R.T., Dunne K.A. and Delworth T.L. (2002) Increasing Risk of Great Floods in a Changing Climate. Nature 415, 514–517. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Min S-K., Zhang X., Zwiers F.W. and Hegerl G.C. (2011) Human contribution to more-intense precipitation extremes. Nature 470, 378–81. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Allan R.P. (2011) Climate change: Human influence on rainfall. Nature 470, 344–345. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Pall P., Aina T., Stone D.A., Stott P.A., Nozawa T. and Hilberts A.G.J. (2011) Anthropogenic greenhouse gas contribution to flood risk in England and Wales in autumn 2000. Nature 470, 382–385. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Abbott J., Davies P., Simkins P., Morgan C., Levin D. and Robinson P. (2013) Creating Water Sensitive Places, C724. London: CIRIA. [Google Scholar]
  9. Met Office (2014) The Recent Storms and Floods in the UK. Exeter: Met Office. [Google Scholar]
  10. King D.A (2004) Climate change science: adapt, mitigate, or ignore? Science 303, 176–7. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. United Nations (2014) World Urbanization Prospects: The 2014 Revision, Highlights (ST/ESA/SER.A/352). Washington: United Nations. [Google Scholar]
  12. Jha A.K., Bloch R., and Lamond J. (2012) Cities and Flooding. Washington: World Bank. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Wheater H. and Evans E. (2009) Land use, water management and future flood risk. Land Use Policy. 26, 251–64. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hoyer J., Dickhaut W., Kronwitter L. and Weber B. (2011) Water Sensitive Urban Design: Principles and Inspiration for Sustainable Stormwater Management in the City of the Future. Berlin: Jovis. [Google Scholar]
  15. Wong T.H.F. Allen R., Brown R. et al. (2013) blueprint2013: Stormwater Management in a Water Sensitive City. Adelaide: CRCWSC. [Google Scholar]
  16. EU (2000) Water Framework Directive. Brussels: European Commission. [Google Scholar]
  17. EU (2009) Floods Directive. Brussels: European Commission. [Google Scholar]
  18. Rijke J., van Herk S., Zevenbergen C. and Ashley R. (2012) Room for the River: delivering integrated river basin management in the Netherlands. International Journal of River Basin Management. IAHR 10, 369–82. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (2005) Making space for water. London: Defra. [Google Scholar]
  20. Scottish Environment Protection Agency (2009) Flooding in Scotland: A consultation on Potentially Vulnerable Areas and Local Plan Districts. Edinburgh: SEPA. [Google Scholar]
  21. Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources (2014) Revised Planning Policy Statement 15: ‘Planning and Flood Risk’. Belfast: DOENI. [Google Scholar]
  22. Welsh Government (2011) National Strategy for Flood and Coastal Erosion Risk Management in Wales. Cardiff: Welsh Government. [Google Scholar]
  23. Environmental Protection Agency (2007). Reducing Stormwater Costs through Low Impact Development (LID): Strategies and Practices. Washington, DC: EPA. [Google Scholar]
  24. Environmental Protection Agency (2013) Stormwater to Street Trees. Washington, DC: EPA. [Google Scholar]
  25. Benedict M.A., McMahon E.T. and Fund M.A.T.C. (2012) Green Infrastructure. Washington, DC: Island Press. [Google Scholar]
  26. Portney K.E. (2013) Taking Sustainable Cities Seriously. Massachusetts: MIT Press. [Google Scholar]
  27. Mayer H. and Provo J. (2004) The Portland Edge in Context. Ozawa C.P. (ed.) The Portland Edge: Challenges and successes in growing communities. Washington, DC: Island Press. [Google Scholar]
  28. Bureau of Environmental Services (2001) Johnson Creek Restoration Plan. Portland: BES. [Google Scholar]
  29. Saha D., Paterson R.G. (2008) Local Government Efforts to Promote the “Three Es” of Sustainable Development: Survey in Medium to Large Cities in the United States. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 28, 21–37. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Slavin M. (2013) Sustainability in America’s Cities. Washington, DC: Island Press. [Google Scholar]
  31. Shandas V, Nelson A, Arendes C and Cibor C (2010) Tabor to the River: An evaluation of outreach efforts and opportunities for engaging residents in stormwater management. [Google Scholar]
  32. Susdrain (2012) Sustainable Drainage. London: Susdrain. [Google Scholar]
  33. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (2011) Flood Risk and Insurance: A roadmap to 2013 and beyond. [Google Scholar]
  34. RSPB (2012) Sustainable drainage systems. London: RSPB. [Google Scholar]
  35. Anglian Water (2009) Guidance on the use of sustainable drainage systems (SUDS) and an overview of the adoption policy introduced by Anglian Water. Huntingdon: Anglian Water. [Google Scholar]
  36. Werritty A., Houston D., Ball T., Tavendale A. and Black A (2007) Exploring the Social Impacts of Flood Risk and Flooding in Scotland. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive. [Google Scholar]
  37. Johnson C.L. and Priest S.J. (2008) Flood Risk Management in England: A Changing Landscape of Risk Responsibility? International Journal of Water Resources Development, 24, 513–25. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. Kenyon W. (2007) Evaluating flood risk management options in Scotland: A participantled multi-criteria approach. Ecological Economics, 64, 70–81. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. Apostolaki S. and Jefferies C. (2005) Social impacts of stormwater management techniques including river management and SUDS. Final report, SUDS01. Bristol: Environment Agency. [Google Scholar]
  40. HRWallingford (2003) An Assessment of the Social Impacts of Sustainable Drainage Systems in the UK. Wallingford: HR Wallingford. [Google Scholar]
  41. Bastien N.R.P., Arthur S. and McLoughlin M.J. (2011) Valuing amenity: public perceptions of sustainable drainage systems ponds. Water & Environment Journal. 26, 19–29. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. Shandas V. (2015) Neighborhood change and the role of environmental stewardship: a case study of green infrastructure for stormwater in the City of Portland, Oregon, USA. Ecology and Society. 20(3): 16. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  43. Church S.P. (2015) Exploring Green Streets and rain gardens as instances of small scale nature and environmental learning tools. Landscape and Urban Planning. 134, 229–40. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. Baert P., da Silva F.C. (2010) Social Theory in the Twentieth Century and Beyond. Cambridge: Polity Press. [Google Scholar]
  45. Reckwitz A. (2002) Toward a Theory of Social Practices: A Development in Culturalist Theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory, 5, 243–63. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  46. Schatzki T.R. (1996) Social Practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  47. Spaargaren G. (2011) Global Environmental Change. Global Environmental Change, 21, 813–22. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  48. Warde A. (2005) Consumption and Theories of Practice. Journal of Consumer Culture, 5, 131–53. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  49. Shove, E. and Southerton D. (2000) Defrosting the Freezer: From Novelty to Convenience: A Narrative of Normalization. Journal of Material Culture, 5, 301–319. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  50. Shove, E., Pantzar M. and Watson M. (2012) The Dynamics of Social Practice: Everyday life and how it changes. London: SAGE. [Google Scholar]
  51. Shove E. (2005) Consumers, Producers and Practices: Understanding the invention and reinvention of Nordic walking. Journal of Consumer Culture, 5, 43–64. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  52. Shove E (2010) Beyond the ABC: climate change policy and theories of social change. Environ. Plann. A, 42, 1273–85. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  53. Spaargaren G. and Mol A (2008) Greening global consumption: Redefining politics and authority. Global Environmental Change, 18, 350–9. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  54. Spurling N., McMeekin A., Shove E., Southerton D. snd Welch D (2013) Interventions in practice: re-framing policy approaches to consumer behaviour. Manchester: Sustainable Practices Research Group. [Google Scholar]
  55. Glover A. (2013) Should it Stay or Should it Go?: Social Practices of Material Divestment. SCORAI Conference, Clark University, Massachusetts. [Google Scholar]
  56. Hackett B. and Lutzenhiser L (1985) The unity of self and object. Western Folklore, 44, 317–24. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  57. Singleton D (2012) SuDS in the community: a suitable case for treatment? London: Susdrain. [Google Scholar]
  58. Franklin J.F. (2008) Preserving Biodiversity: Species, Ecosystems, or Landscapes? Ecological Applications, 3:2, 202–205. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  59. Purvis A. and Hector A. (2000) Getting the measure of biodiversity. Nature. 405, 212–9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Hanley N., Spash C. and Walker L. (1995) Problems in valuing the benefits of biodiversity protection. Environ Resource Econ. 5, 249–72. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  61. Chiesura A. (2004) The role of urban parks for the sustainable city. Landscape and Urban Planning, 68, 129–38. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  62. Swanwick C., Dunnett N. and Woolley H. (2003) Nature, role and value of green space in towns and cities: An overview. Built Environment, 29, 94–106. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  63. Coley R.L., Sullivan W.C. and Kuo F.E. (1997) Where Does Community Grow? The Social Context Created by Nature in Urban Public Housing. Environment and Behavior, 29, 468–94. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  64. Dunnett N. and Qasim M. (2000) Perceived Benefits to Human Well-being of Urban Gardens. HortTechnology. 10, 40–5. [Google Scholar]
  65. Barbosa O., Tratalos J.A., Armsworth P.R., Davies R.G., Fuller R.A., Johnson P., et al. (2007) Who benefits from access to green space? A case study from Sheffield, UK. Landscape and Urban Planning, 83, 187–95. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  66. Fuller R.A., Irvine K.N., Devine-Wright P., Warren P.H. and Gaston K.J. (2007) Psychological benefits of greenspace increase with biodiversity. Biology Letters, 3, 390–4. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Carrus G., Scopelliti M., Lafortezza R., Colangelo G., Ferrini F., Salbitano F., et al. (2015) Go greener, feel better? The positive effects of biodiversity on the well-being of individuals visiting urban and peri-urban green areas. Landscape and Urban Planning, 134, 221–8. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  68. Krekel C., Kolbe J. and Wüstemann H. (2016) The greener, the happier? The effect of urban land use on residential well-being. Ecological Economics, 121, 117–27. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  69. Barnhill K. and Smardon R. (2012) Gaining Ground: Green Infrastructure Attitudes and Perceptions from Stakeholders in Syracuse, New York. Environmental Practice, 14, 6–16. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  70. LaBadie K. (2010) Identifying Barriers to Low Impact Development and Green Infrastructure in the Albuquerque Area. Master of Water Resources Professional Project Proposal, University of New Mexico. [Google Scholar]
  71. Traver R.G. (2009) Efforts to address urban stormwater runoff. Statement before the Subcommittee on Water Resources and Environment, U.S. House of Representatives. [Google Scholar]
  72. Everett G., Lamond J.E., Morzillo A.T., Matsler A.M., Chan F.K.S. (2016) Delivering Green Streets: an exploration of changing perceptions and behaviours over time around bioswales in Portland, Oregon. Journal of Flood Risk Management [online]. [Google Scholar]
  73. Everett G., Lamond J.E., Morzillo A.T., Matsler A.M., Chan F.K.S. (2015) Sustainable drainage systems: Helping people live with water. Proceedings of the ICE-Water Management [online]. [Google Scholar]
  74. Bureau of Environmental Services (2012) The Green Street Steward’s Maintenance Guide. Portland: BES. [Google Scholar]
  75. FurnhamA. (1986) Response bias, social desirability and dissimulation. Personality and Individual Differences, 7, 385–400. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  76. Whitehead J.C. (1991) Environmental Interest Group Behavior and Self-Selection Bias in Contingent Valuation Mail Surveys. Growth and Change, 22, 10–20. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.