Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 7, 2016
3rd European Conference on Flood Risk Management (FLOODrisk 2016)
Article Number 16005
Number of page(s) 8
Section Learning from past events
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20160716005
Published online 20 October 2016
  1. Argote, L., Miron-Spektor, E. (2011). Organizational Learning: From Experience to Knowledge. In: Organization Science, 22(5), 1123–1137. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bazerman, M. H., Watkins, M. D. (2008). Predictable Surprises. The Disasters You Should Have Seen Coming, and How to Prevent Them. Boston. [Google Scholar]
  3. Benz, A.; Fuerst, D. (2002). Policy Learning in Regional Networks. In: European Urban and Regional Studies, 9(1), 21–35. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bogner, A.; Menz, W. (2009). Das theorie-generierende Experteninterview. Erkenntnisinteresse, Wissenformen, Interaktion. In: Littig, A. Bogner, B.; Menz, W. (Hrsg.): Experteninterviews. Theorien, Methoden, Anwendungsfelder. Wiesbaden, 61–98. [Google Scholar]
  5. Carroll, J. S.; Rudolph, J. W.; Hatakenaka, S. (2003). Learning from Organizational Experience. In: Easterby-Smith, M.; Lyles, M. A. (eds.) (2003): The Blackwell Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management. Malden, 575–600. [Google Scholar]
  6. Deutsches Komitee für Katastrophenvorsorge (DKKV) (eds.) (2015). Das Hochwasser im Juni 2013. Bewährungsprobe für das Hochwasserrisikomanagement in Deutschland. Bonn. [Google Scholar]
  7. Easterby-Smith, M.; Lyles, M. A. (eds.) (2003). The Blackwell Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management. Malden. [Google Scholar]
  8. Emirbayer, M.; Mische, A. (1998). What is Agency? In: American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 962–1023. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Healey, P. (2009). In Search of the ‘Strategic’ in Spatial Strategy Making. In: Planning Theory & Practice, 10(4), 439–457. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hutter, G. (2007). Strategic Planning for Long-Term Flood Risk Management – Some Suggestions for Learning How to Make Strategy at Regional and Local Level. In: International Planning Studies, 12, 273–89. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hutter, G. (2016). Collaborative Governance and Rare Floods in Urban Regions – Dealing with Uncertainty and Surprise. In: Environmental Science & Policy, 55(2), 302–308. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Janssen, G. (2012). HQ1-HQextrem: Hochwasser-risikomanagement im novellierten Wasserrecht. In: Risikodogmatik im Umweltrecht und Technikrecht – von der Gefahrenabwehr zum Risikomanagement, edited by: Jaeckel, L., Janssen, G., Tübingen, 81–103. [Google Scholar]
  13. Kruse, J. (2015). Qualitative Interviewforschung. Ein integrativer Ansatz. Weinheim/Basel. [Google Scholar]
  14. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. London. [Google Scholar]
  15. Lampel, J., Shamsie, J., Shapira, Z. (2009). Experiencing the Improbable: Rare Events and Organizational Learning. In: Organization Science, 20(5), 835–845. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Landeshauptstadt Dresden (LHD) (ed.) (2012). Umweltbericht 2012. Dresden – 10 Jahre nach den Hochwassern 2002. Dresden. [Google Scholar]
  17. Landeshauptstadt Dresden (LHD (ed.) (2014). Umweltbericht 2013. Bericht zum Junihochwasser in Dresden. Ansätze zur Verbesserung des vorsorgenden Schutzes der Landeshauptstadt Dresden vor Hochwasser.Dresden. [Google Scholar]
  18. Lawrence, T. B.; Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutions and Institutional Work. In: Clegg, S. R.; Hardy, C.; Lawrence, T. B.; Nord, W. R., (Hrsg.): Handbook of Organization Studies. London, 215–254. [Google Scholar]
  19. Lawrence, T. B.; Suddaby, R.; Leca, B. (2011). Institutional Work: Refocusing Institutional Studies of Organization. In: Journal of Management Inquiry, 20(1), 52–58. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. March, J. G. (1994). A Primer on Decision Making. How Decisions Happen. New York. [Google Scholar]
  21. March, J. G. (2010). The Ambiguities of Experience. Ithaca/London. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. March, J. G., Sproull, L. S., Tamuz, M. (1991). Learning from Samples of One or Fewer. In: Organization Science, 2(1), 1–13. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Merz, B., Elmer, F., Thieken, A. H. (2009). Significance of “High Probability/Low Damage” Versus “Low Probability/High Damage” Flood Events. In: Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 9, 1033–1046. [Google Scholar]
  24. Müller U. (2013). 10 Jahre Hochwasserrisikomana-gement in Sachsen. In: 36. Dresdner Wasserbaukollo-quium 2013 Technischer und organisatorischer Hoch-wasserschutz, edited by: TU Dresden, Dresden, 1–19. [Google Scholar]
  25. Naumann, Th.; Golz, S.; Schinke, R. (2015). Parametrisierte synthetische Schadensfunktionen zur Abschätzung hochwasserinduzierter Gebäudeschäden; In: WasserWirtschaft, 9, 28–32. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Neubert, M.; Naumann, Th.; Hennersdorf, J.; Nikolowski, J. (2016). The Geographic Information System-based flood damage simulation model HOWAD; In: Journal of Flood Risk Management, 9(1), 36–49. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Regionaler Planungsverband Oberes Elbtal/Osterzgebirge – Geschäftsstelle (RPV OE/OE) (ed.)(2012). Mit Sicherheit wächst der Schaden? Überlegungen zum Umgang mit Hochwasser in der räumlichen Planung. Radebeul. [Google Scholar]
  28. Scott, W. R. (2014). Institutions and Organizations. Ideas, Interests, and Identities.Thousand Oaks u. a. [Google Scholar]
  29. Van de Ven, A. H. (2007). Engaged Scholarship. A Guide for Organizational and Social Research.Oxford. [Google Scholar]
  30. Vulturius, G. (2013). Policy Change and Policy Learning for Enhanced Flood Policies at Local, Subnational and EU Level. In: Climate Change and Flood Risk Management. Adaptation and Extreme Events at the Local Level, edited by: Keskitalo, E. C. H., Cheltenham/Northampton, 121–149. [Google Scholar]
  31. Weber, K.; Glynn, M. A. (2006). Making Sense with Institutions: Context, Thought and Action in Karl Weick’s Theory. In: Organization Studies, 27(11), 1639–1660. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in Organizations. London. [Google Scholar]
  33. Weick, K. E. (2001). Making Sense of the Organization. Oxford/Malden. [Google Scholar]
  34. Yin, R. K. (2014). Case Study Research. Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks u. a. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.