Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 7, 2016
3rd European Conference on Flood Risk Management (FLOODrisk 2016)
Article Number 17003
Number of page(s) 11
Section Disaster management and recovery
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20160717003
Published online 20 October 2016
  1. OXFAM (2009). Le droit de survivre, le défi humanitaire du 21ème siècle, 8 p.
  2. Alexander D. (2010). Post disaster reconstruction: planning and sustainability, University of Florence, 35 p.
  3. Christoplos I. (2006). The elusive “window of opportunity” for risk reduction in post-disaster recovery, Intervention “ProVention Consortium Forum”, Bangkok, 2-3 February 2006, 4p.
  4. Gaillard J. C. (2008). Alternative paradigms of volcanic risk perception: The case of Mt. Pinatubo in the Philippines. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, vol. 172, n°3–4, pp. 315–328. [CrossRef]
  5. Vinet F. (2003). Crues et inondations dans la France méditerranéenne. Les crues torrentielles des 12 et 13 novembre 1999 (Aude, Tarn, Pyrénées Orientales et Hérault), Editions du Temps, Nantes, 224 p.
  6. Ingram J. C., Franco G., Rumbaitis-Del Rio C. and Khazai B. (2006). Post-disaster recovery dilemmas : challenges in balancing short-term and long-term needs for vulnerability reduction, Environmental Science & Policy, 9, pp. 607–613. [CrossRef]
  7. Hernandez J. (2009). The Long Way Home : une catastrophe qui se prolonge à La Nouvelle- Orléans, trois ans après le passage de l’ouragan Katrina, L’Espace géographique 2009/2, Vol. 38, pp. 124–138.
  8. Disaster Mitigation Act (2000). Public law 106-390, OCT. 30. FEMA, 26 p.
  9. Mc Entire D. (2007). Disaster Response and Recovery. Hoboken, NJ : Wiley, c 2007. 498 p
  10. Olshansky R. B., Hopkins L. D., Johnson L. A. (2012). Disaster and recovery: processes compressed in time. Natural Hazards Review, 13, 3, 173–245. [CrossRef]
  11. Dumas P., Chavrot A., Legrand H., Macaire A., Dimitrov C., Martin X. and Queffelec C. (2005). Mission d’enquête sur le régime d’indemnisation des victimes de catastrophes naturelles. 756 p.
  12. Palier J. and Prevost B., (2007). Vulnérabilité et gestion des risques : potentialités et limites de la microfinance. L’exemple de l’Inde du Sud, Mondes en développement, n°138, pp. 103–118. [CrossRef]
  13. Smith G. and Wenger D. (2006). Sustainable disaster recovery: Operationalizing an existing framework in Rodriguez H., Quarantelli E. and Dynes R. (Eds.), Handbook of disaster research, New York: Springer, pp. 234–257.
  14. Bryson K. M., et al. (2002). Using formal MS/OR modeling to support disaster recovery planning, European Journal of Operational Research 141 in Elsevier, 10 p.
  15. Aysan Y. and Oliver P. (1987). Housing and culture after earthquakes. Oxford, Oxford Polytechnic Press.
  16. De Vanssay B. (2010). Le Reconstruction – Développement Durable et Réduction de la Vulnérabilité, Risques Infos n°24 (publication de l’Institut des Risques MAjeurs), pp. 6–9.
  17. Participatory Planning Guide for Post-Disaster Reconstruction (2004). Join report prepared by EPC-Environmental Planning Collaborative, Ahmedabad, India and TCG International, LLC, Washington DC with the support of USAID/India and the Indo-US Financial Institutions Reform and Expansion (FIRE-D) Project, January 2004, 26 p.
  18. Schott C., (dir.) (2014). Inondation extrême quelles réponses à l’échelle nationale et européenne. Rapport du Groupe de diagnostic stratégique n°1–25e Session nationale « Sécurité et Justice »- 2013/2014. INHESJ, 68 p.
  19. IRP, UNISDR (2012). Guidance note on recovery: pre-disaster recovery planning, 45 p.
  20. Diefendorf J. M. (2009). Reconstructing Devastated Cities: Europe after World War II and New Orleans after Katrina, Journal of Urban Design, 14:3, 377–397. [CrossRef]
  21. Gray P. O. and Kendrick O. (2004). The memory of Catastrophe, Manchester – New York, Manchester University Press, 50 p.
  22. Smith G. P. (2004). Holistic Disaster Recovery: Creating a More Sustainable Future, Online Training, Federal Emergency Management Agency, (November 1, 2009).
  23. Pigeon P. (2010). Catastrophes dites naturelles, risques et développement durable : Utilisations géographiques de la courbe de Farmer, VertigO - la revue électronique en sciences de l’environnement [En ligne], Volume 10 Numéro 1 \ avril 2010, mis en ligne le 26 avril 2010, consulté le 08 octobre 2015. URL: http://vertigo.revues.org/9491; DOI: 10.4000/vertigo.9491
  24. Coles J. B. et al. (2011). Case study in disaster relief: A descriptive analysis of agency partnerships in the aftermath of the January 12th, 2010 Haitian earthquake, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences in Elsevier, p.11

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.