EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 7 (2016) E3S Web Conf., 7 (2016) 17003 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 7, 2016
3rd European Conference on Flood Risk Management (FLOODrisk 2016)
Article Number 17003
Number of page(s) 11
Section Disaster management and recovery
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20160717003
Published online 20 October 2016
  1. OXFAM (2009). Le droit de survivre, le défi humanitaire du 21ème siècle, 8 p. [Google Scholar]
  2. Alexander D. (2010). Post disaster reconstruction: planning and sustainability, University of Florence, 35 p. [Google Scholar]
  3. Christoplos I. (2006). The elusive “window of opportunity” for risk reduction in post-disaster recovery, Intervention “ProVention Consortium Forum”, Bangkok, 2-3 February 2006, 4p. [Google Scholar]
  4. Gaillard J. C. (2008). Alternative paradigms of volcanic risk perception: The case of Mt. Pinatubo in the Philippines. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, vol. 172, n°3–4, pp. 315–328. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Vinet F. (2003). Crues et inondations dans la France méditerranéenne. Les crues torrentielles des 12 et 13 novembre 1999 (Aude, Tarn, Pyrénées Orientales et Hérault), Editions du Temps, Nantes, 224 p. [Google Scholar]
  6. Ingram J. C., Franco G., Rumbaitis-Del Rio C. and Khazai B. (2006). Post-disaster recovery dilemmas : challenges in balancing short-term and long-term needs for vulnerability reduction, Environmental Science & Policy, 9, pp. 607–613. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hernandez J. (2009). The Long Way Home : une catastrophe qui se prolonge à La Nouvelle- Orléans, trois ans après le passage de l’ouragan Katrina, L’Espace géographique 2009/2, Vol. 38, pp. 124–138. [Google Scholar]
  8. Disaster Mitigation Act (2000). Public law 106-390, OCT. 30. FEMA, 26 p. [Google Scholar]
  9. Mc Entire D. (2007). Disaster Response and Recovery. Hoboken, NJ : Wiley, c 2007. 498 p [Google Scholar]
  10. Olshansky R. B., Hopkins L. D., Johnson L. A. (2012). Disaster and recovery: processes compressed in time. Natural Hazards Review, 13, 3, 173–245. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Dumas P., Chavrot A., Legrand H., Macaire A., Dimitrov C., Martin X. and Queffelec C. (2005). Mission d’enquête sur le régime d’indemnisation des victimes de catastrophes naturelles. 756 p. [Google Scholar]
  12. Palier J. and Prevost B., (2007). Vulnérabilité et gestion des risques : potentialités et limites de la microfinance. L’exemple de l’Inde du Sud, Mondes en développement, n°138, pp. 103–118. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Smith G. and Wenger D. (2006). Sustainable disaster recovery: Operationalizing an existing framework in Rodriguez H., Quarantelli E. and Dynes R. (Eds.), Handbook of disaster research, New York: Springer, pp. 234–257. [Google Scholar]
  14. Bryson K. M., et al. (2002). Using formal MS/OR modeling to support disaster recovery planning, European Journal of Operational Research 141 in Elsevier, 10 p. [Google Scholar]
  15. Aysan Y. and Oliver P. (1987). Housing and culture after earthquakes. Oxford, Oxford Polytechnic Press. [Google Scholar]
  16. De Vanssay B. (2010). Le Reconstruction – Développement Durable et Réduction de la Vulnérabilité, Risques Infos n°24 (publication de l’Institut des Risques MAjeurs), pp. 6–9. [Google Scholar]
  17. Participatory Planning Guide for Post-Disaster Reconstruction (2004). Join report prepared by EPC-Environmental Planning Collaborative, Ahmedabad, India and TCG International, LLC, Washington DC with the support of USAID/India and the Indo-US Financial Institutions Reform and Expansion (FIRE-D) Project, January 2004, 26 p. [Google Scholar]
  18. Schott C., (dir.) (2014). Inondation extrême quelles réponses à l’échelle nationale et européenne. Rapport du Groupe de diagnostic stratégique n°1–25e Session nationale « Sécurité et Justice »- 2013/2014. INHESJ, 68 p. [Google Scholar]
  19. IRP, UNISDR (2012). Guidance note on recovery: pre-disaster recovery planning, 45 p. [Google Scholar]
  20. Diefendorf J. M. (2009). Reconstructing Devastated Cities: Europe after World War II and New Orleans after Katrina, Journal of Urban Design, 14:3, 377–397. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Gray P. O. and Kendrick O. (2004). The memory of Catastrophe, Manchester – New York, Manchester University Press, 50 p. [Google Scholar]
  22. Smith G. P. (2004). Holistic Disaster Recovery: Creating a More Sustainable Future, Online Training, Federal Emergency Management Agency, (November 1, 2009). [Google Scholar]
  23. Pigeon P. (2010). Catastrophes dites naturelles, risques et développement durable : Utilisations géographiques de la courbe de Farmer, VertigO - la revue électronique en sciences de l’environnement [En ligne], Volume 10 Numéro 1 \ avril 2010, mis en ligne le 26 avril 2010, consulté le 08 octobre 2015. URL: http://vertigo.revues.org/9491; DOI: 10.4000/vertigo.9491 [Google Scholar]
  24. Coles J. B. et al. (2011). Case study in disaster relief: A descriptive analysis of agency partnerships in the aftermath of the January 12th, 2010 Haitian earthquake, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences in Elsevier, p.11 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.