Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 7, 2016
3rd European Conference on Flood Risk Management (FLOODrisk 2016)
Article Number 18012
Number of page(s) 12
Section Forecasting and warning
Published online 20 October 2016
  1. VivianH. (1994). L’hydrologie artificialisée de l’Isère en Amont de Grenoble. Essai de quantification des impacts des aménagements, Revue de Géographie Alpine, 82(2), p.97–112. [Google Scholar]
  2. VivianR. (2001). L’eau dans tous ses états, cent ans de recherches géographiques dans les Alpes françaises. Revue de Géographie Alpine, 89(4), p. 199–210. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Verbunt et al. (2005). The hydrologic impact of land cover changes and hydropower stations in the Alpine Rhine basin, Ecological modelling, 187, p.71–84. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. KoscielnyM. (2008). Impact des aménagements en montagne sur les processus hydrologiques et l’évolution dynamique des versants (les Arcs, Savoie, France). Bulletin Eng Geol Environ (67), pp.585–595 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. BieriM. et al. (2010), Modelling and simulation of floods in alpine catchments equipped with complex hydropower schemes, in DittrichA. et al.(Eds) River Flow; Proc. intern. symp., Braunschweig, September 8 – 10 2010, pp. 1420–1428. [Google Scholar]
  6. JordanF. et al.(2005) Flood forecast and management model of the Rhône river: optimal use of the alpine hydropower schemes for the reduction of peak flows, La Houille Blanche, 5, pp. 91–102. [Google Scholar]
  7. PayanJ.-L. et al.(2008). How can man-made water reservoirs be accounted for in a lumped rainfallrunoff model? Water Resources Research, 44, 11 p. [Google Scholar]
  8. ClaudeA. et al.(2010). Towards an operational flood forecasting system taking into account hydropower plants operations. Mathematical Modelling in Civil Engineering, Bucharest University Press, 6(4), pp. 26–42 [Google Scholar]
  9. Durand et al. (1993). A meteorological estimation of relevant parameters for snow schemes used with atmospheric models. Anals of Glaciology, pp.65–71. [Google Scholar]
  10. VidalJ.P. et al.(2010). A 50-year high-resolution atmospheric reanalysis over France with the Safran system, Int. J. Climatol. 30, 1627–1644 [Google Scholar]
  11. PerrinC. et al.(2003). Improvement of a parsimonious model for streamflow simulation. Journal of Hydrology, 279: 275–289. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. ValéryA. et al.(2014) As simple as possible but not simpler: What is useful in a temperature-based snowaccounting routine? Part 2 – Sensitivity analysis of the CEMANEIGE snow accounting routine on 380 basins, Journal of Hydrology, 517, 1176–1187. [Google Scholar]
  13. SchafliB. et al.(2005). A conceptual glaciohydrological model for high mountainous basins. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions, 2: 73 [Google Scholar]
  14. PicouetC. and GottardiF. (2011). Snow accumulation submodel: how to estimate the phase of precipitations and the snow correction factor? Geophysical Research Abs., EGU 2015, 13. [Google Scholar]
  15. OudinL. et al.(2005) Which potential evapotranspiration input for a lumped rainfall-runoff model? Part 2 – Towards a simple and efficient potential evapotranspiration model for rainfall-runoff modeling, Journal of Hydrology, 303(1-4), pp. 290–306. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. GoldbergD. (1989). Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning, Addison-Wesley. [Google Scholar]
  17. NashJ.E. and SutcliffeJ.V. (1970). River flow forecasting through conceptual models, Part I, Discussion of principles, Journal of Hydrology, 10(3), pp. 282–290 [Google Scholar]
  18. RandrianasoloA. et al.(2011) Hydrological ensemble forecasting at ungauged basins: using neighbour catchments for model setup and updating. Adv. Geosci., 29(1–11). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.