Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 7, 2016
3rd European Conference on Flood Risk Management (FLOODrisk 2016)
Article Number 19001
Number of page(s) 5
Section Evacuation and emergency management planning
Published online 20 October 2016
  1. Alexander D. (1993). Natural Disasters. UCL Press, London.
  2. Vrijling J.K. (2009). The lesson of New Orleans. in Kallen MJ, Kuniewski SP (eds). Risk and Decision Analysis in Maintenance Optimization and Flood Management. Pp. 57–69.
  3. Bourque L.B., Siegel JM, Kano M, Wood MM. (2006). Weathering the storm: impact of hurricanes on physical and mental health. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 604:121–159. [CrossRef]
  4. Kolen B. (2013). Certainty of uncertainty in evacuation for threat driven responses; Principles of adaptive evacuation management for flood risk planning in the Netherlands. PhD Thesis University of Nijmegen.
  5. Jonkman S.N. (2007). Loss of life estimation in flood risk assessment. Theory and applications. PhD Thesis. Delft University of Technology.
  6. Barendregt A, van Noortwijk JM, van der Doef M, Holterman SR. (2005). Determining the time available for evacuation of a dike-ring area by expert judgement. In Vrijling JK, Ruijgh E, Stalenberg B, Van Gelder PHAJM, Verlaan M, Zijderveld A, WaartsP (eds). International Symposium on Stochastic Hydraulics.
  7. Urbina E, Wolshon B. (2003) National review of hurricane evacuation plans and policies: A comparison and contrast of state practices. Transportation Practices Part A 37:257–275. [CrossRef]
  8. Kolen B, Helsloot I. (2012). Time needed to evacuate the Netherlands in the event of large-scale flooding: Strategies and consequences. Disasters, 36(4):700–722. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Wolshon B, Urbina E, Wilmot C, Levitan M. (2005). Review of policies and practices for hurricane evacuation, I: Transportation planning, preparedness, and responses. Natural Hazards Revie, 6:129–142. [CrossRef]
  10. Dow K, Cutter CL. (2000). Public orders and personal opinions: Household strategies for hurricane risk assessment. Environmental Hazards, 2:143–155. [CrossRef]
  11. Gruntfest E.C., Carsell K. (2000). The Warning Process: Toward an Understanding of FalseAlarms.
  12. Kolen B, Kok M, Helsloot I, Maaskant B. (2013). EvacuAid: A Probabilistic Model to Determine the Expected Loss of Life for Different Mass Evacuation Strategies During Flood Threats. Risk Analysis, 33: 1312–1333. [CrossRef]
  13. Kolen B. and Helsloot I. (2014). Decision-making and evacuation planning for flood risk management in the Netherlands. Disasters, 38: 610–635 [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Tversky A. and Kahneman D. (1974). Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Science New Series, Vol. 185, 4157, 1124–1131.
  15. Walker W.E., Harremoës P., Rotmans J., van der Sluijs J. P., van Asselt M.B.A., Janssen P., Krayer von Krauss M.P., (2003). Defining uncertainty. A conceptual basis for uncertainty management in model based decision support. Integrated Assessment, 4(1):5–17. [CrossRef]
  16. Brugnach M., Dewulf A., Pahl-Wostl C. and Taillieu T. (2008). Toward a Relational Concept of Uncertainty: about Knowing Too Little, Knowing Too Differently, and Accepting Not to Know. Ecology and Society, 13(2): 30. [CrossRef]
  17. Boin A, ‘t Hart P, Stern E, Sundelius B. (2006). The politics of crisis management. Public leadership under pressure.
  18. Dewulf A, Craps M, Bouwen R, Taillieu T, Pahl-Wostl C. (2005). Integrated management of natural resources: dealing with ambiguous issues, multiple actors and diverging frames. Water, Science and Technology, Vol. 52, pp 115–124.
  19. Bedford T, Cooke R. (2001). Probabilistic risk analyses: foundations and methods. p19
  20. ten Brinke W.B.M., Saeijs G.E.M., Helsloot I. and van Alphen J. (2008). Safety chain approach in flood risk management. Municipal Engineer,161 (4):181–188.
  21. Terpstra T. (2009) Flood Preparedness; Thoughts, Feelings and Intentions of the Dutch Public. Enschede: University of Twente.
  22. ten Brinke W.B.M., Bannink B.A., Ligtvoet W. (2008) The evaluation of flood risk policy in the Netherlands. Journal on Watermanagement, 151(4):181–188.
  23. Kron W. (2002) Keynote lecture: Flood risk = hazard x exposure x vulnerability. In Proceedings of the flood defence conference.
  24. Gendreau N., Longhini M, Combe PM. (1998). Gestion du risque d’inondation et méthode inondabilité: une perspective socio-economique. Ingenieurs EAT, 14:3–15.
  25. Cutter S.L. (1996). Vulnerability to environmental hazards. Progress in Human Geography, 20 (4):529–539. [CrossRef]
  26. Vrijling J.K., Gelder P.H.A.J.M. (2000). An analyses of the valuation of human life. ESREL.
  27. Viscusie W.K., Aldy J.(2003). The value of a statistical life: a critical review of market estimates throughout the world. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 27 (1):5–76. [CrossRef]
  28. Rosebud. (2004). The use of efficiency assessment tools: solution to barriers.
  29. HSE. (2011). Reducing risks protecting people, HSE’s decision making process. Health and safety executive.
  30. Bočkarjova M., Rietveld P, Verhoef E (2012). Composite valuation of immaterial damage in flooding: value of statistical life, value of statistical evacuation and value of statistical injury. Tinbergen institute discussion paper 12-047/3.
  31. Bočkarjova M., Rietveld P, Verhoef ET. (2010) Instruments for decision-making: Immaterial damage valuation in flood risk context. In paper presented at the International Conference “Delta’s in Times of Climate Change”.
  32. Kind J. (2011). Economic efficient flood protection standards for The Netherlands. 5th International Conference on Flood Management.
  33. Jongejan R., Stefess H, Roode N, Horst W ter, Maaskant B (2011). The VNK2 project: A detailed, large scale quantitative flood risk analysis for the Netherlands. 5th International Conference on Flood Management.
  34. De Bruijn K., Beckers J, Van Der Most H. (2010). Casualty risks in the discussion on new flood protection standards in the Netherlands. In de Wrachien D, Proverbs D, Brebbia CA, Mambretti S (eds). 2nd International Conference on Flood Recovery, Innovation and Response. Pp. 73–83.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.