Open Access
| Issue |
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 7, 2016
3rd European Conference on Flood Risk Management (FLOODrisk 2016)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 19002 | |
| Number of page(s) | 7 | |
| Section | Evacuation and emergency management planning | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20160719002 | |
| Published online | 20 October 2016 | |
- Bieberstein, A., et al. (2007). River dikes - actual developments for improvement in flood safety. Bautechnik, 84(12), pp. 829–837. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Lind, N., Pandey, M. & Nathwani, J. (2009). Assessing and affording the control of flood risk. Structural Safety, 31(2), pp. 143–147. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- European Parliament and Council (2007). Directive 2007/60/EC on the assessment and management of flood risks. Official Journal of the European Union, L288, pp. 27–34. [Google Scholar]
- Bouwer, L.M., et al. (2009). Inundation scenarios for flood damage evaluation in polder areas. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 9(6), pp. 1995–2007. [Google Scholar]
- Vorogushyn, S., et al. (2010). A new methodology for flood hazard assessment considering dike breaches. Water Resources Research, 46(8), pp. 17. [Google Scholar]
- CIRIA(2013). The International Levee Handbook. CIRIA, London, pp. 1332. [Google Scholar]
- Vorogushyn, S. (2008). Analysis of flood hazard under consideration of dike breaches. Dissertation, University of Potsdam, pp. 165. [Google Scholar]
- Cannata, M. & Marzocchi, R. (2012). Twodimensional dam break flooding simulation: a GIS-embedded approach. Natural Hazards, 61(3), pp. 1143–1159. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Jonkman, S.N., Kok, M. & Vrijling, J.K. (2008). Flood Risk Assessment in the Netherlands: A Case Study for Dike Ring South Holland. Risk Analysis, 28(5), pp. 1357–1374. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Lin, B., Wicks, J. & Falconer, R.A. (2006). Integrating 1D and 2D hydrodynamic models for flood simulation. Water Management, 159(1), pp. 19–25. [Google Scholar]
- Homagk, P. & Ludwig, K. (2009). Operational forecast of flooding as a consequence of rhine dykebreaks in Baden-Württemberg. WasserWirtschaft, 99(1/2), pp. 12–16. [Google Scholar]
- geomer GmbH & RZB GbR(2015). FloodArea and FloodAreaHPC: ArcGIS extension for calculating flooded areas. geomer GmbH, Heidelberg, pp. 67. [Google Scholar]
- Anders, K., Assmann, A. & Fritsch, K. (2014). Operationelle Überflutungssimulation für Deichbrüche. AGIT - Journal für Angewandte Geoinformatik, 1, pp. 228–233. [Google Scholar]
- Uniwasser GmbH, geomer GmbH & Magdeburg-Stendal, H. (2015). Abschlussbericht: Erarbeitung einer Methodik zur zeitnahen Abschätzung von Überflutungssituationen infolge von Deichbrüchen unter Berücksichtigung der Erfahrungen im Juni-Hochwasser 2013 an der Elbe. Landesbetrieb für Hochwasserschutz und Wasserwirtschaft Sachsen-Anhalt, unpublished, p. 110. [Google Scholar]
- Jüpner, R., Brauneck, J. & Pohl, R. (2015). Einsatz von Drohnen im Hochwasserfall – Erfahrungen und Ideen. Wasser Wirtschaft, 9, pp. 49–54. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.