Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 7, 2016
3rd European Conference on Flood Risk Management (FLOODrisk 2016)
Article Number 20002
Number of page(s) 8
Section Policy appraisal, investment planning and decision making tools
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20160720002
Published online 20 October 2016
  1. Wilkinson M.E., Quinn PF, Welton P (2010). Runoff management during the September 2008 floods in the Belford catchment, Northumberland. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 3(4), 285–295. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Berkes F. (2010). Devolution of environment and resources governance. trends and future. Environmental Conservation, 37(4), 489–500. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Margerum R.D. (2008). A Typology of Collaboration Efforts in Environmental Management. Environmental Management, 41(4), 487–500. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Torre A., Gilly JP (2000). On the Analytical Dimension of Proximity Dynamics. Regional Studies, 34(2), 169–180 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Lundquist K.J., Trippl M (2013). Distance, proximity and types of cross-border innovation systems. A conceptual analysis. Regional Studies, 47(3), 450–460. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Zeller C. (2004). North Atlantic Innovative Relations of Swiss Pharmaceuticals and the Proximities with Regional Biotech Arenas. Economic Geography, 80(1), 83–111 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Boschma R.A. (2005). Proximity and Innovation. A Critical Assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1), 61–74. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Moodysson J., Jonsson O (2007). Knowledge Collaboration and Proximity. The Spatial Organization of Biotech Innovation Projects. European Urban and Regional Studies, 14(2), 115–131. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Huber F. (2012). On the Role and Interrelationship of Spatial, Social and Cognitive Proximity. Personal Knowledge Relationships of R&D Workers in the Cambridge Information Technology Cluster. Regional Studies, 46(9), 1169–1182. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Torre A., Rallet A (2005). Proximity and Localization. Regional Studies, 39(1), 47–59. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Balland P. A. (2012). Proximity and the Evolution of Collaboration Networks. Evidence from Research and Development Projects within the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNESS) Industry. Regional Studies, 46(6), 741–756. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. North D. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hansson K., Danielson M, Ekenberg L (2008). A framework for evaluation of flood management strategies. Journal of Environmental Management, 86(3), 465–480. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kubal C., Haase D, Meyer V, Scheuer S (2009). Integrated urban flood risk assessment – adapting a multicriteria approach to a city. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 9(6), 1881–1895. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Bourdieu P. (1986). The forms of capital. In RichardsonJ (ed). Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. Greenwood, New York, pp.241–258 [Google Scholar]
  16. Coleman J. (1990). Foundations of Social Theory. Harvard University Press, Cambridge [Google Scholar]
  17. Novy A. (2002). Die Methodologie interpretative Sozialforschung. SRE - Discussion Papers, 2002/01. Institut für Wirtschaftsgeographie, Abt. Stadt- und Regionalentwicklung, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business, Vienna [Google Scholar]
  18. Witt, Harald (2001). Forschungsstrategien bei quantitativer und qualitativer Sozialforschung. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum Qualitative Social Research, 2(1), Art. 8 [Google Scholar]
  19. Walker R. (1985). An Introduction to Applied Qualitative Research. In WalkerR (eds.). Applied Qualitative Research. Gower Pub Co., Aldershot, pp. 2–26 [Google Scholar]
  20. Puchinger F., Henle A (2007). Regionalplanungen – ein Instrument zur Umsetzung nachhaltiger Schutzkonzepte. Wildbach- und Lawinenverbau, 71(156), 90–99 [Google Scholar]
  21. Stiglitz J. (2000). Contributions of the Economics of Information to Twentieth Century Economics. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(4), 1441–1478 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Tseng C.P., Penning-Rowsell E (2012). Micropolitical and related barriers to stakeholder engagement in flood risk management. The Geographical Journal, 178(3), 253–269. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kuhlicke C., Steinfuehrer A, Begg C, Bianchizza C, Bruendl M, Buchecker M, De Marchi B, Di Masso Tarditti M, Höppner C, Komac B, Lemkow L, Luther J, McCarthy SS, Pellizzoni L. Renn O, Scolobig A, Supramaniam M, Tapsell S, Wachinger G, Walker G, Whittle R, Zorn M, Faulkner H (2011). Perspectives on social capacity building for natural hazards: outlining an emerging field of research and practice in Europe. Environmental Science and Policy, 14(7), 804–814. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Razafindrabe BHN, Kada R, Arima M, Inoue S (2012). Analysing flood risk and related impacts to urban communities in central Vietnam. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, (in press). [Google Scholar]
  25. Fatti C.E., Patel Z (2012-2013). Perceptions and responses to urban flood risk. Implications for climate governance in the South. Applied Geography, 36, 13–22. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Jessop B. (2004). Multi-level governance and multilevel metagovernance changes in the European Union as integral moments in the transformation and reorientation of contemporary statehood. In. Bache I, FlindersM (ed). Multi-level Governance Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp.49–74 [Google Scholar]
  27. Foucault M. (1982). The Subject and Power. Critical Inquiry, 8(4), 777–795. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Moss T. (2008). ‘Cold spots’ of Urban Infrastructure. ‘Shrinking’ Processes in Eastern Germany and the Modern Infrastructural Ideal. International Journal of Urban and Regional Studies, 32(2), 436–451. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Weichhart P. (2006). Interkommunale Kooperation. Zwischen Notwendigkeit und Verweigerung. In Biwald P, Hack H, WirthK (ed). Interkommunale Kooperation. Zwischen Tradition und Aufbruch. NWV Publisher, Vienna, pp.151–166 [Google Scholar]
  30. Graham S., Marvin S (2001). Splintering Urbanism. Networked Infrastructures, Technological Mobilities and the Urban Condition. Routledge, London [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Smith N. (1990). Uneven development. Nature, capital, and the Production of Space. 2nd edition. Basil Blackwall, Oxford [Google Scholar]
  32. OÖ (2012). Landesrecht Oberösterreich. Gesamte Rechtsvorschrift für OÖ. Katastrophenschutzgesetz, Fassung vom 20.05.2013. Linz [Google Scholar]
  33. Moss T. (2012). Spatial Fit, from Panacea to Practice. Implementing the EU Water Framework Directive. Ecology & Society, 17(3), 2 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Holub M., Fuchs S (2009). Mitigating mountain hazards in Austria – legislation, risk transfer, and awareness building. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 9(2), 523–537. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. Prager K. (2010). Local and Regional Partnerships in Natural Resource Management. The Challenge of Bridging Institutional Levels. Environmental Management, 46(5), 711–724. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.