Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 7, 2016
3rd European Conference on Flood Risk Management (FLOODrisk 2016)
Article Number 20006
Number of page(s) 12
Section Policy appraisal, investment planning and decision making tools
Published online 20 October 2016
  1. Biswas AK (2004) Integrated Water Resources Management: A Reassessment: A Water Forum Contribution. Water Int. 29(2):248–56. [CrossRef]
  2. Lenton R, Muller M (2009) Integrated water resources management in practice: Better water management for development. London: Sterling, VA: Global Water Partnership/Earthscan
  3. GWP (Global Water Partnership) (2014) What is IWRM? [Internet]. Available from:
  4. Molle F (2009) River-basin planning and management: The social life of a concept. Geoforum 40(3):484–94. [CrossRef]
  5. AWRA (American Water Resources Association) (2012) Case studies in integrated water resources management: From local stewardship to national vision [Internet]. AWRA Policy Committee; Available from:
  6. Serra-Llobet A, Conrad E, Schaefer K (in review) Governing for integrated water and flood risk management: Comparing approaches in Spain and California. Water.
  7. Kaika M (2003) The Water Framework Directive: A new Directive for a changing social, political and economic European framework. Eur Plan Stud. 13(3):299–316. [CrossRef]
  8. EU (European Union) (2007) Directive 2007/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 on the assessment and management of flood risks. Official Journal on 6 November 2007, page 27.
  9. DG Environment (2016) The EU Floods Directive [Internet]. Available from:
  10. WRC (Water Resources Council) (1968) The nation’s water resources: the first assessment of the Water Resources Council. Washington DC: US Government Printing Office
  11. Dworsky LB, Allee DJ, North RM (1991) Water resources planning and management in the United States federal system: long term assessment and intergovernmental issues. Nat Resour J. 34:475–547.
  12. US EPA (US Environmental Protection Agency). The watershed approach [Internet]. Undated. Available from:
  13. Duram L, Brown KG (1999) Insights and Applications Assessing Public Participation in U.S. Watershed Planning Initiatives. Soc Nat Resour. 12(5).
  14. White GF (1945) Human adjustments to floods: a geographical approach to the flood problem in the United States. University of Chicago
  15. Eisenstain W, Kondolf M, Cain J (2007) ReEnvisioning the Delta: Alternative futures for the heart of California. Berkeley, California: Institute of Urban and Regional Development, University of California, Berkeley
  16. Federal Interagency Floodplain Management Task Force. A unified national program for floodplain management (1994) Transmitted to the US Congress by President Bill Clinton, March 6, 1995
  17. Lopez-Llompart P, Kondolf GM (2016) Encroachments in floodways of the Mississippi River and Tributaries Project. Nat Hazards 81(1):513–42. [CrossRef]
  18. Huffman JL (2008) The Federal Role in Water Resource Management. NYU Environ Law J. 17(1).
  19. Conrad E (2015) Bridging the hierarchical and collaborative divide: Learning in California’s Integrated Regional Water Management Process. University of California, Berkeley
  20. Hundley, Jr. N (2001) The great thirst: Californians and water – A history. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press
  21. DWR (Department of Water Resources) (2014) California water plan Update 2013 (Bulletin 160- 03). Sacramento, CA: California Natural Resources Agency
  22. WEF (Water Education Foundation) (2013) Layperson’s guide to integrated regional water management. Sacramento, CA
  23. DWR (Department of Water Resources) (2015) IRWM Grant Program Legislation [Internet]. Available from:
  24. ACA (Agència Catalana de l’Aigua) (2009) Pla de gestí de l’aigua de Catalunya. Document en informació pública [Internet]. Departament de Medi Ambient i Habitatge. Generalitat de Catalunya. Available from:
  25. Martí-Llambrich C (2005) La transformació del paisatge litoral de la Costa Brava: Anàlisi de l’evolucí (1956-2003), diagnosi de l’estat actual i prognosi de futur. [Girona]: Universitat de Girona
  26. Olcina J, Sauri D, Hernández M, Ribas A (2016) Flood policy in Spain: a review for the period 1983-2013. Disaster Prev Manag Int J. 25(1):41–58. [CrossRef]
  27. Pérez-Morales A, Gil-Guirado S, Olcina-Cantos J. (2015) Housing bubbles and the increase of flood exposure. Failures in flood risk management on the Spanish south-eastern coast (1975-2013): Housing bubbles and increase of flood risk in Spain. J Flood Risk Manag. n/a–n/a.
  28. SFBAIRWMP (San Francisco Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan) (2013) San Francisco Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan
  29. ACA (Agència Catalana de l’Aigua) (2015) Proposta de pla de gestí del risc d’inundací del districte de conca fluvial de Catalunya (2016-2021). Barcelona: Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat – Departament d’Interior. Generalitat de Catalunya. p. 119
  30. ACA (Agència Catalana de l’Aigua) (2015) Pla de gestió del discticte conca fluvial de Catalunya i programa de mesures (2016-2021). Document síntesi. Barcelona: Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat. Generalitat de Catalunya. p. 42.
  31. California Legislature. Senate Bill 1672 [Internet]. 2002. Available from:, accessed 3/10/2015
  32. DWR (California Department of Water Resources) (2009) California Water Plan Update 2009: Integrated Water Management (Bulletin 160-09) [Internet]. Available from:
  33. SFBAIRWMP (San Francisco Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan) (2006) Integration White Paper for the San Francisco Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan
  34. Leahy TC (2016) Desperate Times Call for Sensible Measures: The Making of the California Sustainable Groundwater Management Act. Gold Gate Univ Law J [Internet]. Available from:

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.