Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 7, 2016
3rd European Conference on Flood Risk Management (FLOODrisk 2016)
Article Number 20010
Number of page(s) 5
Section Policy appraisal, investment planning and decision making tools
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20160720010
Published online 20 October 2016
  1. Hegger, D. L. T., Green, C., Driessen, P. P. J., Bakker, M. H. N., Dieperink, C., Crabbé, A., Deketelaere, K., Delvaux, B., Suykens, C., Beyers, J. C., Fournier, M., Larrue, C., Manson, C., Van Doorn-Hoekveld, W., Van Rijswick, H. F. M. W., Kundzewicz, Z.W. and Goytia-Casermeiro, S., (2013). Flood Risk Management in Europe: Similarities and Differences between the STARFLOOD consortium countries. STAR-FLOOD Consortium, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  2. Hegger, D. L. T., Driessen, P. P. J., Dieperink, C., Wiering, M., Raadgever, G. T. and Van Rijswick, H. F. M. W. (2014). Assessing stability and dynamics in flood risk governance: an empirically illustrated research approach. Water Resources Management Vol. 28, pp. 4127–4142. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0732-x. [CrossRef]
  3. Aerts, J. C. J. H., Botzen, W., Van Der Veen, A., Krykow, J. and Werners, S. (2008). Dealing with uncertainty in flood management through diversification. Ecology and Society Vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 41. [CrossRef]
  4. Innocenti, D. and Albrito, P. (2011). Reducing the risks posed by natural hazards and climate change: the need for a participatory dialogue between the scientific community and policy makers. Environmental Science & Policy Vol. 14, pp. 730–733. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2010.12.010. [CrossRef]
  5. Wardekker, J. A., De Jong, A., Knoop, J. M. and Van der Sluijs, J. P. (2010). Operationalising a resilience approach to adapting an urban delta to uncertain climate changes. Technological Forecasting and Social Change Vol. 77, pp. 987–998. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2009.11.005. [CrossRef]
  6. Van Den Brink, M., Termeer, C. A. J. M. and Meijerink, S. (2011). Are Dutch water safety institutions pre-pared for climate change? Journal of Water and Climate Change Vol. 2, pp. 272–287. [CrossRef]
  7. Hegger, D. L. T., Driessen, P. P. J., Wiering, M., Van Rijswick, H. F. M. W., Kundzewicz, Z. W., Matczak, P., Crabbé, A., Raadgever, G.T., Bakker, M. H. N., Priest, S. J., Larrue, C. and Ek, K. (submitted). Toward more flood resilience: is a diversification of FRM strategies the way forward? Ecology and Society.
  8. Mees, H., Suykens, C., Beyers, J. C., Crabbé, A., Delvaux, B., and Deketelaere, K. (2015). Analysing and evaluating flood risk governance in Belgium. Dealing with flood risks in an urbanised and institutionally complex country. University Antwerp, KU Leuven, Belgium, available online via www.starflood.eu.
  9. Alexander, M., Priest, S., Micou, A. P., Tapsell, S., Green, C., Parker, D. and Homewood, S. (2015). Analysing and evaluating flood risk governance in England – Enhancing societal resilience through comprehensive and aligned flood risk governance. STAR-FLOOD Consortium. Flood Hazard Research Centre, Middlesex University, available online via www.starflood.eu.
  10. Larrue, C., Bruzzone, S., Lévy, L., Gralepois, M., Schellenberger, T., Trémorin, J. B., Fournier, M., Manson, C. and Thuillier, T. (2015). Analysing and evaluating Flood Risk Governance in France: from State Policy to Local Strategies, Tours, France, available online via www.starflood.eu.
  11. Kaufmann, M., Van Doorn-Hoekveld, W. J., Gilissen, H. K. and Van Rijswick, H. F. M. W. (2015). Drowning in safety. Analysing and evaluating flood risk governance in the Netherlands. STAR-FLOOD Consortium, Utrecht, The Netherlands, available online via www.starflood.eu.
  12. Matczak, P., Lewandowski, J., Choryński, A., Szwed, M. and Kundzewicz, Z. W. (2015). Flood risk governance in Poland: Looking for strategic planning in a country in transition. STAR-FLOOD Consortium, Utrecht, The Netherlands, available online via www.starflood.eu.
  13. Ek, K., Goytia, S., Pettersson, M., and Spegel, E. (2015). Analysing and evaluating flood risk governance in Sweden - Adaptation to Climate Change?, STAR-FLOOD Consortium, Utrecht, The Netherlands, available online via www.starflood.eu.
  14. Larrue, C., Hegger, D.L.T, Trémorin, J.B (2013), Researching Flood Risk Policies in Europe: a framework and methodology for assessing Flood Risk Governance (report no D2.2.1), STAR-FLOOD Consortium, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  15. Alexander, M., Priest, S. and Mees, H. (2015) Practical guidelines for evaluating flood risk governance. STAR-FLOOD Consortium, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  16. Hegger, D. L. T., Driessen, P. P. J., Bakker, M. H. N. (Eds.). FINAL REPORT: Key conclusions on improving flood risk governance in Europe. STARFLOOD consortium, Utrecht, The Netherlands. (forthcoming).
  17. Gilissen, H. K., Alexander, M., Beyers, J. C., Chmielewski, P., Matczak, P., Pettersson, M., Schellenberger, T., Suykens, C. (in preparation). Bridges over Troubled Waters – An Interdisciplinary Framework for Evaluating the Interconnectedness within Fragmented Flood Risk Management Systems.
  18. Mees, H., Crabbé, A., Alexander, M., Kaufmann, M., Bruzzone, S., Lévy, L. and Lewandowski, J. (submitted). Co-producing flood risk management through citizen involvement – insights from crosscountry comparison in Europe.
  19. Aarhus convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-Making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters.
  20. Floods Directive (Directive 2007/60/EC).
  21. Priest, S., Suykens, C., Rijswick, H. F. M. W., Schellenberger, T., Goytia, S., Kundzewicz, Z. W., Van Doorn-Hoekveld, W., Beyers, J. C., Homewood, S. (submitted). The European Union approach to flood risk management and improving societal resilience: Lessons from the implementation of the Floods Directive in six European countries.
  22. Pettersson, M., Ek, K., Suykens, C., Priest, S., Alexander, M. and Pardoe, J. (in preparation). Best practices and design principles for resilient, efficient and legitimate flood risk governance – Lessons from cross-country comparisons. STAR-FLOOD consortium, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.