Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 7, 2016
3rd European Conference on Flood Risk Management (FLOODrisk 2016)
Article Number 20013
Number of page(s) 7
Section Policy appraisal, investment planning and decision making tools
Published online 20 October 2016
  1. OPW (2004) Report of the Flood Policy Review Group ( [Google Scholar]
  2. EU (2007) Directive on the Assessment and Management of Flood Risks [2007/60/EC] [Google Scholar]
  3. Saaty T. L. (1990) How to make a decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. European Journal of Operational Research, 48, 9–26. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Saaty T. L. (2003) Decision-making with the AHP: Why is the principal eigenvector necessary. European Journal of Operational Research, 145, 85–91. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Central Statistics Office (2016) Irish national census data Accessed January 2016. [Google Scholar]
  6. Cardona O. D. (2006) A system of indicators for disaster risk management in the Americas. IN BIRKMANN J. (Ed.) Measuring vulnerability to hazards of natural origin: towards disaster resilient societies. Tokyo, UNU Press. [Google Scholar]
  7. Bjarnadottir S., Li Y. & Stewart M. (2011) Social vulnerability index for coastal communities at risk to hurricane hazard and a changing climate. Natural Hazards, 59, 1055–1075. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kienberger S., Lang S. & Zeil P. (2009) Spatial vulnerability units - expert-based spatial modelling of socio-economic vulnerability in the Salzach catchment, Austria. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences., 9, 767–778 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Saaty T. L. & Vargas L. G. (1982) The Logic of Priorities: Applications in Business, Energy, Health and Transportation, Pittsburgh, PA, RWS Publications. [Google Scholar]
  10. Saaty T. L. & Kearns K. P. (1985) Analytical Planning: The Organisation of Systems, Pittsburgh, PA, RWS Publications. [Google Scholar]
  11. Freeling A. (1983) Belief and Decision Aiding. PhD Thesis. University of Cambridge. [Google Scholar]
  12. Dyer J. S. (1990) Remarks on the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Management Science, 36, 249–258. [Google Scholar]
  13. Apostolou B. & Hassell J. M. (1993) An empirical examination of the sensitivity of the analytic hierarchy process to departures from recommended consistency ratios. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 17, 163–170. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Andrew T. N., Rahoo P. & Nepal T. (2005) Enhancing the selection of communication technology for rural telecommunications: An analytic hierarchy process model. International Journal of Computers, Systems and Signals, 6, 26–34. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.