EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 7 (2016) E3S Web Conf., 7 (2016) 22003 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 7, 2016
3rd European Conference on Flood Risk Management (FLOODrisk 2016)
Article Number 22003
Number of page(s) 10
Section Residual risk and insurance
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20160722003
Published online 20 October 2016
  1. Falconer, R. H., Cobby, D., Smyth, P., Astle, G., Dent, J., and Golding, B. (2009). Pluvial flooding: new approaches in flood warning, mapping and risk management. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 2(3), 198–208. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Environment Agency. (2010). The costs of the summer 2007 floods in England. Environment Agency, Bristol. [Google Scholar]
  3. Pitt, M. (2008). Learning Lessons from the 2007 Floods, The Pitt Review. Cabinet Office, London. [Google Scholar]
  4. European Water Association. (2009). EWA Expert Meeting on Pluvial Flooding in Europe, Final Report. EWA, Brussels, Belgium. [Google Scholar]
  5. IPCC (Ed.). (2013). Summary for Policymakers. In: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Vol. 1). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. [Google Scholar]
  6. Ramsbottom, D., Sayers, P. and Panzeri, M. (2012). Climate Change Risk Assessment for the Floods and Coastal Erosion Sector. UK Climate Change Risk Assessment. Defra, London. [Google Scholar]
  7. Adaptation Sub-Committee. (2012). Climate Change -Is the UK preparing for flooding and water scarcity? Committee on Climate Change, London. [Google Scholar]
  8. Houston, D., Werritty, A., Bassett, D., Geddes, A., Hoolachan, A., and McMillan, M. (2011). Pluvial (rain-related) flooding in urban areas: the invisible hazard. Joseph Rowntree Foundation. [Google Scholar]
  9. Jenkins, K., Surminski, S., Hall, J., and Crick, F. (2016). Assessing surface water flood risk and management strategies under future climate change: an agent-based model approach. Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy Working Paper No.252; Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment Working Paper No.223. [Google Scholar]
  10. Surminski, S. and Eldridge, J. (2015). Flood insurance in England–an assessment of the current and newly proposed insurance scheme in the context of rising flood risk. Journal of Flood Risk Management. DOI: 10.1111/jfr3.12127. [Google Scholar]
  11. Defra. (2013). Securing the future availability and affordability of home insurance in areas of flood risk. Defra, London. [Google Scholar]
  12. Greater London Authority. (2011). The London Climate Change Adaptation Strategy. GLA, London. [Google Scholar]
  13. Greater London Authority. (2014). Flood risks in London: Summary of findings. GLA, London. [Google Scholar]
  14. Wallingford., HR (2012). Development of spatial indicators to monitor changes in exposure and vulnerability to flooding and the uptake of adaptation actions to manage flood risk in England: Results 2012. HR Wallingford Ltd, Oxfordshire. [Google Scholar]
  15. Greater London Authority. (2015). London datastore http://data.london.gov.uk/. GLA, London. [Google Scholar]
  16. Drain London. (2011). Surface Water Management Plan: London Borough of Camden. Camden Council. [Google Scholar]
  17. van Dam, K.H., Nikolic, I. and Lukszo, Z. (2012). Agent-based modelling of socio-technical systems. Springer Netherlands, p. 268. [Google Scholar]
  18. Dubbelboer, J., Nikolic, I., Jenkins, K. and Hall, J. (2016). An Agent-Based Model of Flood Risk and Insurance. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, In Review. [Google Scholar]
  19. Hall, J.W., Dawson, R.J., Sayers, P.B., Rosu, C., Chatterton, J.B. and Deakin, R. (2003). A methodology for national-scale flood risk assessment. Water & Maritime Engineering 156, 235–247. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Dawson, R.J., Ball, T., Werritty, J., Werritty, A., Hall, J.W. and Roche, N. (2011). Assessing the effectiveness of non-structural flood management measures in the Thames Estuary under conditions of socio-economic and environmental change. Global Environmental Change 21, 628–646. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Jenkins, K., Hall, J., Glenis, V. and Kilsby, C. (2016). A probabilistic analysis of surface water flood risk and management options in Greater London. Journal of Risk Analysis. In Review. [Google Scholar]
  22. Sayers, P.B., Horritt, M., Penning-Rowsell, E., and McKenzie, A. (2015). Climate Change Risk Assessment 2017: Projections of future flood risk in the UK. Research undertaken by Sayers and Partners on behalf of the Committee on Climate Change. Committee on Climate Change, London. [Google Scholar]
  23. Defra. (2011). Commencement of the Flood and Water Management Act 2010, Schedule 3 for Sustainable Drainage: Impact Assessment. Defra, London. [Google Scholar]
  24. Harries, T. (2012). The anticipated emotional consequences of adaptive behaviour -impacts on the take-up of household flood-protection measures. Environment and Planning A, 44(3), 649–668. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Filatova, T. (2015). Empirical agent-based land market: Integrating adaptive economic behavior in urban land-use models. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 54, 397–413. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Flood Re. (2016). Transitioning to an affordable market for household flood insurance: The first Flood Re transition plan. Flood Re, London. February 2016. [Google Scholar]
  27. Surminski, S., Jenkins, K. and Crick, F. (2015). London Case Study: Flood risk and climate change implications for MSPs. ENHANCE deliverable 7.4: Assessment of multi-sectoral partnerships. www.enhanceproject.eu. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.