Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 19, 2017
International Conference Energy, Environment and Material Systems (EEMS 2017)
Article Number 02009
Number of page(s) 8
Section Environment
Published online 23 October 2017
  1. (accessed August 05. 2017) [Google Scholar]
  2. (accessed August 05. 2017) [Google Scholar]
  3. H.B. Glasgow, J.M. Burkholder, R.E. Reed, A.J. Lewitus, J.E. Kleinmann, J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 300, (2004) [Google Scholar]
  4. Q. Wang, S. Li, P. Pia, Ch.Qi, F. Ding, Sci World J, 231768, 7 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  5. Z.X. Xu, S.Q. Lu, J Hydrodyn. 15, 2 (2003) [Google Scholar]
  6. S.E. Jorgensen, Lake Reserv Manage J. 3 (2001) [Google Scholar]
  7. D.M. Di Toro, J.P. Connolly, Mathematical Models of Water Quality in Large Lakes, (USEPA, 1980) [Google Scholar]
  8. R. V. Thomann, J.A. Muller, Principles of surface water quality modeling and control, (Harper & Row Publishers, 1987) [Google Scholar]
  9. W.S Lung, Water quality modeling for waste load allocations and TMDLs, (John Wiley & Sons Inc., 2001) [Google Scholar]
  10. G.T. Orlob, Mathematical Modeling of Water Quality: Streams, Lakes, and Reservoirs (John Willey & Sons, 1983) [Google Scholar]
  11. J.L. Martin, S.C. McCutcheon, Hydrodynamics and transport for water quality modeling (CRC Press, Inc., 1999) [Google Scholar]
  12. S.D. Lau, V.R. Stovin, I. Guymer, Water Sci. Technol. 55, 4 (2007) [Google Scholar]
  13. R. Pastres, S. Ciavatta, Environ. Modell Softw. 20, 8 (2005) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. X.J. Cao, H. Zang, J. Water Resour. Archit. Eng. 4, 4 (2006) [Google Scholar]
  15. D.J. O'Connor, Water Resour Res, 3, (1967) [Google Scholar]
  16. D.M. Di Toro, J.J. Fitzpatrick, R.V. Thomann, Water Quality Analysis Simulation Program (WASP) and Model Verification Program (MVP) -Documentation, (Hydroscience Inc., Westwood, NY, 1983). [Google Scholar]
  17. A. Zieminska-Stolarska, Analysis of the flux of biogenic substances on water eutrophication in the large water bodies on the example of the Sulejow Reservoir, PhD Thesis, Lodz University of Technology, (2014) [Google Scholar]
  18. R. Miranda, F. Braunschweig, P. Leitão, R. Neves, F. Martins, A. Santos, Ecol. Environ 40 (2000) [Google Scholar]
  19. GEMSS® Workshop Guide, ERM Inc., (Exton, PA, USA, 2009) [Google Scholar]
  20. Danish Hydraulic Institute, MIKE21: User Guide and Reference Manual (Danish Hydraulic Institute, Horsholm, 1996) [Google Scholar]
  21. T.A. Wool, R.B. Ambrose, J.L. Martin, E.A. Comer, Water Quality Analysis Simulation Program (WASP) - version 6.0. USEPA, Atlanta, 2001) [Google Scholar]
  22. Voivodeship Inspectorate For Environmental Protection in Lodz. Report on the state of water purity in the Sulejow Reservoir in 2007, (Lodz 2008) [Google Scholar]
  23. B. Rakowska, M. Sitkowska, E. Szczepocka, B. Szulc, Oceanol. Hydrobiol. Stud. 1 (2005) [Google Scholar]
  24. J. Kubrak, E. Nachlik, Hydraulic bases of flow capacity calculation for river beds, (SGGW, Warsaw, 2003) [Google Scholar]
  25. V.A. Verkhozina, O.M. Kozhova, Y.S. Kusner, Aquat. Ecosyst. Health 3, 2 (2000) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Deus, R., Brito D., Kenov I.A., Lima M., Ecol. Modell. 253 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  27. A.G. Andersson, P. Andreasson, T.S. Lundström, Eng. Appl. Comp. Fluid 7, 1 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  28. K. Izydorczyk, M. Tarczynska, Ecohydrol. Hydrobiol. 5 (2005) [Google Scholar]
  29. A.K.M. Kabzinski, H. Grabowska, Gospodarka Wodna, 5 (2008) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.