Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 23, 2017
World Renewable Energy Congress-17
Article Number 09002
Number of page(s) 14
Section 9. Wind Energy
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20172309002
Published online 20 November 2017
  1. T. Traber and C. Kemfert, Gone with the Wind?: Electricity Market Prices and Incentives to Invest in Thermal Power Plants under Increasing Wind Energy Supply, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  2. W. I. Horowitz, J. Moore and A. Pacheco, The impact of wind generation on the electricity spot-market price level and variance: The Texas experience, Energy Policy, no.7, pp. 3939-3944, July 2011. [Google Scholar]
  3. M. Valdés, M. D. Duran and A. Rovira, Thermoeconomic optimization of combined cycle gas turbine power plants using genetic algorithms, Applied Thermal Engineering, no. 17, pp. 2169-2182, December 2003. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. A. Rovira, C. Sánchez, M. Muñoz and M. D. Duran, Thermoeconomic optimisation of heat recovery steam generators of combined cycle gas turbine power plants considering off-design operation, Energy Conversion and Management, no. 4, pp. 1840-1849, April 2011. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. E. Godoy, J. S. N. and J. B. S., Families of optimal thermodynamic solutions for combined cycle gas turbine, Applied Thermal Engineering, pp. 569-576, 2010. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. E. Mearns, The balancing capacity issue: A ticking time-bomb under the UK’s Energiewende, Energy Matters, 30 June 2014. [Online]. Available: http://euanmearns.com/the-balancing-capacity-issue-a-ticking-time-bomb-under-the-uks-energiewende/. [Accessed April 2016]. [Google Scholar]
  7. Z. Tomsic, I. Rajsl and M. Filipovic, Techno-Economic analysis of common work of Wind and CCGT plant by offering continuous level of power to electricity market, in 11th Conference on Sustainable Development of Energy, Water and Environment Systems - SDEWES, Lisabon, Portugal, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  8. Siemens AG. Energy Sector, Flexible performance, convincing quality -economical and future-proofpackages SGT5-PAC 4000F, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  9. WBCSD Cement Sustainability Initiative (CSI) / ECRA GmbH, “List of Constants and Default CO2 emission factors,” 8 December 2014. [Online]. Available: http://www.cement-co2-protocol.org/v3/Content/Internet_Manual/constants.htm. [Accessed March 2016]. [Google Scholar]
  10. C. L. Hart and J. G. Wright, Gas power plant fuel requirements and uncertainty considering increasing renewables penetration, in African Utility Week, Cape Town, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  11. D. Chase and P. Kehoe, GE Combined-Cycle Product Line and Performance, GE Power Systems. [Google Scholar]
  12. N. Kumar, P. M. Besuner, S. A. Lefton, D. D. Agan and D. D. Hilleman, Power Plant Cycling Costs, Intertek APTECH, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  13. A. Schröder, F. Kunz, J. Meiss, R. Mendelevitch and C. V. Hirschhausen, Current and Prospective Costs of Electricity Generation until 2050, DIW BERLIN - Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Berlin, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  14. S. Simoes, W. Nijs, P. Ruiz, A. Sgobbi, D. Radu, P. Bolat, C. Thiel and S. Peteves, The JRC-EU-TIMES model - Assessing the long-term role of the SET PLan Energy technologies, European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Energy and Transport, 2013. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.