EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 31 (2018) E3S Web Conf., 31 (2018) 08017 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 31, 2018
The 2nd International Conference on Energy, Environmental and Information System (ICENIS 2017)
Article Number 08017
Number of page(s) 14
Section 08. Environmental Conservation
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20183108017
Published online 21 February 2018
  1. Afrizal. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Sebuah upaya mendukung penggunaan penelitian kualitatif dalam berbagai disiplin ilmu. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, (2014) [in Bahasa] [Google Scholar]
  2. Alan Bond., Juan Palerm., Paul Haigh. Environmental Impact Assessment Review: 24:617–641, (2004) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Anne N. Glucker., Peter P.J. Driessen., Arend Kolhoff, Hens A.C. Runhaar. Environmental Impact Assessment Review: 43: 104–111, (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Badan Pusat Statistik. Papua Dalam Angka (Papua in Figures), (2015) [in Bahasa] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bambang Rudito., Melia Famiola. CSR (Corporate Sosial Responsibility), Bandung: Rekayasa Sains, (2013) [in Bahasa] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bambang Rudito., Melia Famiola. Sosial Mapping Metode Pemetaan Sosial Teknik Memahami Suatu Masyarakat atau Komuniti, edisi revisi, Bandung: Rekayasa Sains, (2013) [in Bahasa] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bao Cun-kuana., Lu Yong-sena., Shang Jin-cheng. Environmental Impact Assessment Review; 24: 27–46, (2004) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Berger R. Thomas. Northern Frontiers, Northern Homeland: The Report of the Mackenzie Valley Pipeline Inquiry – Report Volume 1. Otawa. Canada, (1977) [Google Scholar]
  9. Bo-sin Tang., Siu-wai Wong., Milton Chi-hong Lau. Environmental Impact Assessment Review; 28 : 57–72, (2008) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. BP Tangguh LNG. Dokumen Analisis Mengenai Dampak Lingkungan (Amdal), Dokumen Final Andal lampiran 8.3.1, (2001) [in Bahasa] [Google Scholar]
  11. Canter L.W. Environmental Impact Assessment. Second Edition. New York: Inc Mc Graw-Hill, (1996) [Google Scholar]
  12. Chaunjit Chanchitpricha, Alan Bond. 2013. Conceptualising the effectiveness of impact assessment processes, Environmental Impact Assessment Review 43, 65–72, (2013) [Google Scholar]
  13. Ciaran O’Faircheallaigh. Environmental Impact Assessment Review; 27: 319–342, (2007) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ciaran O'Faircheallaigh. Environmental Impact Assessment Review: 30:19–27, (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Death Carl. Mengelola Pembangunan yang Berkelanjutan (Kemitraan, Protes, dan Kekuasaan Di KTT Dunia), Yogyakarta; Pustaka Pelajar, (2014) [in Bahasa] [Google Scholar]
  16. Dewan Suku Tepera Yewena Yosu. Profil Kampung Yepase. Tim Kerja DAS Tepera Yewena Yosu. Distrik Depapre-Refenirara Kabupaten Jayapura, (2015) [in Bahasa] [Google Scholar]
  17. Dewan Suku Moy. Proposal Pengusulan Kampung Dosay. Dosay Kabupaten Jayapura, (2015) [in Bahasa] [Google Scholar]
  18. Dinas Kebudayaan Provinsi Papua. Peta Suku Bangsa Di Tanah Papua, Jurusan Antropologi Universitas Cenderawasih (Uncen), Summer Institute of Linguistic (SIL), Dewan Papua (DAP) dan Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS) Provinsi Papua, (2008) [in Bahasa] [Google Scholar]
  19. Dwi Narwoko J., Bagong Suyanto. Sosiologi: Teks Pengantar dan Terapan, Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, (2004) [in Bahasa] [Google Scholar]
  20. Dwi Susilo K. Rachmad. Sosiologi Lingkungan dan Sumber Daya Alam Perspektif Teori dan Isu-isu Mutakhir. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media, (2012) [in Bahasa] [Google Scholar]
  21. Einar Leknes, Environmental Impact Assessment Review: 21: 309–334, (2001) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Endraswara Suwardi. Filsafat Ilmu. Yogyakarta: CAPS (Center for Academic Publishing Service), (2012) [in Bahasa] [Google Scholar]
  23. Erari K. Phill. Tanah Kita, Hidup Kita (Hubungan Manusia dan Tanah di Irian Jaya sebagai PersoalanTeologis), Jakarta, Pustaka Sinar Harapan, (1999) [in Bahasa] [Google Scholar]
  24. French P. David., Stephen Sutton., Susie J. Hennings J O Mitchell., Nicholas J. Wareham., Simon Griffin., Wendy HArdeman., Ann Louise Kinmont. Journal of Applied Sosial Psychology: 35 (9):1824-1848, (2005) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Fuady Munir. Teori-teori Dalam Sosiologi Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, (2011) [in Bahasa] [Google Scholar]
  26. George Ritzer. Eksplorasi Dalam Teori Sosial Dari Metateori sampai Rasionalisasi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, (2013) [in Bahasa] [Google Scholar]
  27. Gordon Walker. Environmental justice, impact assessment and the politics of knowledge: Theimplications of assessing the sosial distribution of environmental outcomes Environmental Impact Assessment Review: 30: 312–318, (2010) [Google Scholar]
  28. Hadi P. Sudharto. Aspek Sosial AMDAL Sejarah, Teori dan Metode. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press, (2009) [in Bahasa] [Google Scholar]
  29. Hadi P. Sudharto. Resolusi Konflik Lingkungan. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, (2010) [in Bahasa] [Google Scholar]
  30. Hadi P. Sudharto. Dimensi Lingkungan Perencanaan Pembangunan. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press, (2012) [in Bahasa] [Google Scholar]
  31. Jan. J.J.M. Wuisman. Teori dan Praktek Memperoleh kembali kenyataan supaya memperoleh masa depan. Jakarta: Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia, (2013) [in Bahasa] [Google Scholar]
  32. Javier Toro., Oscar Duarte., Ignacio Requena., Montserrat Zamorano. Environmental Impact Assessment Review: 32:107–117, (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Javier Toro., Ignacio Requena., Oscar Duarte., Montserrat Zamorano. Environmental Impact Assessment Review: 43: 9–20, (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Jennifer L. Walker., Bruce Mitchell., S. Wismer, Environmental Impact Assessment Review: 20 : 513–535, (2000) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. Jesper Persson. Environmental Impact Assessment Review: 26: 605–613, (2006) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. John A Sinclair., Laura Sims., Harry Spaling. Environmental Impact Assessment Review: 29, (2009) [Google Scholar]
  37. John scott. Teori Sosial Masalah-masalah Pokok Dalam Sosiologi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, (2012) [in Bahasa] [Google Scholar]
  38. Juan R.Palerm. Environ Impact Assess rev; 19:201–220, (1999) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. Karl Polyani, The Great Transformation, Societies and economic systems, Boston: Beacon Press; Chapter IV, pp 43-44, (1944) [Google Scholar]
  40. Lawrence W Neuman, Metode Penelitian Sosial: Pendekatan Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif. Jakarta: PT. Indeks, (2013) [in Bahasa] [Google Scholar]
  41. Linda Stalker Prokopy, World Development Vol. 33, No. 11: pp. 1801–1819, (2005) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. Mansoben Johszua Robert. 1995. Sistem Politik Tradisional Di Irian Jaya, Jakarta, Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia (Indonesian Institute of Sciences), (Seri LIPI-RUL: no.5) ISBN 979-8258-06-1. [Google Scholar]
  43. Marion Hourdequin., Peter Landres., Mark J. Hanson., David R. Craig, Environmental Impact Assessment Review; 35: 37–44, (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. Mathius Awoitauw, Pemimpin Transformatif Berbasis Kearifan Lokal. Jakarta. Indomedia Global Mandiri, (2015) [in Bahasa] [Google Scholar]
  45. Nazir. Moh, Metode Penelitian. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia, (2011) [in Bahasa] [Google Scholar]
  46. Nicola Hartley., Christopher Wood., Environmental Impact Assessment Review: 25: 319–340, (2005) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  47. Obaidullah Nadeem., Thomas B. Fischer., Environmental Impact Assessment Review :31: 36–47, (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  48. Reed Isaac., Alexander C. Jeffrey, Sosiologi Kebudayaan dalam Bryan S.Tuner (ed): Teori Sosial Dari Klasik Sampai Postmodern. USA: Blackwell Publishing. Ltd. p.642-661, (2012) [Google Scholar]
  49. Masyarakat Kementrian Lingkungan Hidup. Pedoman Tatacara Inventarisasi Pengakuan Keberadaan Masyarakat Hukum, Kearifan Lokal, dan Hak Masyarakat Hukum yang Terkait Dengan Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup, Jakarta. [in Bahasa] [Google Scholar]
  50. Sairinen R, Environmental Impact Assessment Review; 30: 289–292, (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  51. Salim Agus, Teori dan Paradigma Penelitian Sosial (Dari Denzin Guba dan Penerapannya). Yogyakarta: PT. Tiara Wacana Yogya, (2001) [in Bahasa] [Google Scholar]
  52. Salim Momtaz, Environmental Impact Assessment Review: 25: 33–45, (2005) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  53. Schaefer T. Richard, Sociology. 12th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, (2012) [Google Scholar]
  54. Sidanius Jim., Pratto Felicia, Sosial Dominance; An Intergroup Theory of Sosial Hierarchy and Oppression, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press, (1999) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  55. Soemarwoto Otto, Analisis Mengenai Dampak Lingkungan. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press, (2001) [in Bahasa] [Google Scholar]
  56. Suranto Aw, Komunikasi Sosial Budaya. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu, (2010) [in Bahasa] [Google Scholar]
  57. Thomas F. King, Environmental Impact Assessment Review: 20: 5–30, (2000) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  58. Watloly Aholiab, Sosio Epistemologi Membangun Pengetahuan Berwatak Sosial. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Kanisius, (2013) [in Bahasa] [Google Scholar]
  59. York Richard., Dunlop E. Riley, Sosiologi Lingkungan (Hidup) dalam George Ritzer (ed): The Wiley-Blackwell Companion Sosiologi, UK:Blackwell Publishing Ltd, John Wiley & Sons Ltd. p. 851-879, (2013) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.