Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 31, 2018
The 2nd International Conference on Energy, Environmental and Information System (ICENIS 2017)
Article Number 09031
Number of page(s) 4
Section 09. Environmental Policy, Planning and Education
Published online 21 February 2018
  1. Hamzah S. Pendidikan Lingkungan: Sekelumit Wawasan Pengantar. Bandung: Refika Aditama; (2013). [Google Scholar]
  2. R. Gifford, A. Nilsson, pro-environmental concern and behaviour : A review,1–17, (2014). [Google Scholar]
  3. NC. Bronfman, PC. Cisternas, López-vázquez E, Maza C De, JC. Oyanedel. Understanding Attitudes and Pro-Environmental Behaviors in a Chilean Community, 14133–52, (2015) [Google Scholar]
  4. K. Lee, K. Lee. Gender differences in Hong Kong adolescent consumers ’ green purchasing behavior. (2009); [Google Scholar]
  5. Meinhold JL, Malkus AMYJ. ADOLESCENT ENVIRONMENTAL Can Knowledge, Attitudes, and Self-Efficacy Make a Difference? 37(4):511–32, (2005) [Google Scholar]
  6. D. Hooi, C. Fang, Cheng C. Guided learning and behavioural enhancement. 2017;20(December 2016):16–26. [Google Scholar]
  7. T. Hung, F. Jan, C. Yang, Conceptualizing and measuring environmentally responsible behaviors from the perspective of community-based tourists. JTMA [Internet]. Elsevier; 2013;36:454–68. Available from: [Google Scholar]
  8. L. Steg, C.C. Vlek Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda. J Environ Psychol [Internet]. Elsevier Ltd; 2009;29(3):309–17. Available from: [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. FG. Kaiser, B. Oerke, FX. Bogner, Behavior-based environmental attitude: Development of an instrument for adolescents. 2007;27:242–51. [Google Scholar]
  10. Macovei I. Determinants of Consumers ’ Pro-Environmental Behavior - Toward an Integrated Model. 2015;(August). [Google Scholar]
  11. RD. Iswari, SW. Utomo, Evaluasi Penerapan Program Adiwiyata Untuk Membentuk Perilaku Peduli Lingkungan di Kalangan Siswa,15(1):35–41, (2017) [Google Scholar]
  12. JA. Pooley, MO. Connor, Environment and Behavior. (2000) [Google Scholar]
  13. T. Chankrajang, R. Muttarak. Green Returns to Education : Does Schooling Contribute to Pro-Environmental Behaviours ? Evidence from Thailand. Ecol Econ [Internet]. Elsevier B.V.; 2017;131:434–48. Available from: [Google Scholar]
  14. MA. Vicente-molina, A. Fernández-sáinz, J. Izagirre-olaizola. J Clean Prod [Internet]. Elsevier Ltd; 2013;61:130–8. Available from: [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. A. Homburg, A. Stolberg, Explaining pro-environmental behavior with a cognitive theory of stress $,26:1–14, (2006) [Google Scholar]
  16. S. Bamberg, G. Moser Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera : A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour, 27:14–25, (2007) [Google Scholar]
  17. A. Kollmuss, J. Agyeman. Mind the Gap : Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? 2002;(July 2013):37–41. [Google Scholar]
  18. MS. Omran, Eur Online J Nat Soc Sci,3(3):141–51, (2014) [Google Scholar]
  19. P. Mtutu, G. Thondhlana. Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour : Energy use and recycling at Rhodes University, South Africa. Elsevier Ltd; 2016;53:142–50. Habitat Int [Internet]. Available from: [Google Scholar]
  20. M. Greaves, LD. Zibarras, C. Stride, Using the theory of planned behavior to explore environmental behavioral intentions in the workplace. J Environ Psychol [Internet]. Elsevier Ltd; 2013;34:109–20. Available from: [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. PC. Stern, Toward a Coherent Theory of Environmentally Significant Behavior,56(3):407–24, (2000) [Google Scholar]
  22. J. Boldero, The Prediction of Household Recycling of Newspapers : The Role of Attitudes, Intentions, and Situational Factors 1, 440–62, (1995) [Google Scholar]
  23. M. Tonglet, PS. Phillips, AD. Read, Using the Theory of Planned Behaviour to investigate the determinants of recycling behaviour : a case study from Brixworth, UK, 41:191–214, (2004) [Google Scholar]
  24. G. Davis, F. O’Callaghan, K. Knox. Sustainable attitudes and behaviours amongst a sample of non-academic staff: A case study from an Information Services Department, Griffith University, Brisbane. J Sustain High Educ. (2008) [Google Scholar]
  25. P. Sparks, R. Shepherd, Self-Identity and the Theory of Planned Behavior: Assesing the Role of Identification with “Green Consumerism.” Soc Psychol Q. (1992) [Google Scholar]
  26. N. Newhouse. J Environ Educ, 22(1): 26–32.; (1990) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Leeuw A De, P. Valois, I. Ajzen, P Schmidt, J Environ Psychol [Internet]. Elsevier Ltd; 2015;42:128–38. Available from: [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. J. Li, C. Liu. Intergenerational_influence_on adolescent PEB. (2016) [Google Scholar]
  29. A. Gronhoj, T. Bech-Larsen. Using theory of planned behavior to predict healthy eating among Danish adolescents. (2012) [Google Scholar]
  30. Á, Zsóka, ZM. Szerényi, A. Széchy, T. Kocsis. J Clean Prod [Internet]. Elsevier Ltd; 2013;48:128–38. Available from: [Google Scholar]
  31. G. Szagun, VI. Pavlov, Environmental awareness. (1995). [Google Scholar]
  32. BT. Bell, N. Toth, L. Little, MA. Smith. Planning to Save the Planet : Using an Online Intervention Based on Implementation Intentions to Change Adolescent Self-Reported Energy-Saving Behavior. (2016) [Google Scholar]
  33. NK. Basri, N. Sabahiah, A. Sukor, S. Asmah, An Analysis of Pro-Environmental Attributes Towards Adolescents in Penang using Extended Theory of Planned Behaviour, 802:419–24, (2015) [Google Scholar]
  34. Maryono, H. Nakayama, & T. Shimaoka, Memoirs of the Faculty of Engineering, Kyushu University, 74(3), PP. 79-98 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  35. A. Grønhøj, J. Thøgersen. Action speaks louder than words : The effect of personal attitudes and family norms on adolescents ’ pro-environmental behaviour,33:292–302, (2012) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.