Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 31, 2018
The 2nd International Conference on Energy, Environmental and Information System (ICENIS 2017)
Article Number 09032
Number of page(s) 4
Section 09. Environmental Policy, Planning and Education
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20183109032
Published online 21 February 2018
  1. A. Mulyana., “Kebijakan pengelolaan zona khusus dapatkah meretas kebuntuan dalam menata ruang Taman Nasional di Indonesia?,” Bogor, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  2. Balai TNGMb, “Rencana Pengelolaan Taman Nasional Gunung Merbabu 2014 - 2023,” Jawa Tengah, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  3. H. Gunawan, M. Bismark, and H. Krisnawati, “Kajian Sosial Ekonomi Masyarakat Sekitar Sebagai Dasar Penetapan Tipe Penyangga Taman Nasional Gunung Merbabu, Jawa Tengah,” J. Penelit. Hutan dan Konserv. Alam, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 103–119, 2013. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. I. Marina and H. A. Dharmawan, “Analisis Konflik Sumberdaya Hutan di Kawasan Konservasi,” J. Transdisiplin Sosiologi, Komunikasi, dan Ekol. Mns., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 90–96, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  5. I. Alviya, E. Y. Suryandari, R. Maryani, and M. Z. Muttaqin, “Meningkatkan Peran pemangku Kepentingan Dalam Pengelolaan Wilayah Hulu Daerah Aliran Sungai Ciliwung” J. Penelit. Sos. dan Ekon. Kehutan., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 121–134, 2016. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. J. M. Bryson, “What To Do When Stakeholders Matter: A Guide to Stakeholder Identification and Analysis Techniques,” Minneapolis, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  7. J. Gonsalves, Participatory Research and Development for Sustainable Agriculture and Natural Resource Management: A Sourcebook. Volume 1: Understanding Participatory Research and Development. Philippines and International Development Research Centre, Ottawa, Canada, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  8. A. K. Wakka, “Analisis Stakeholders Pengelolaan kawasan Hutan Dengan Tujuan Khusus(KHDTK) Mengkendek, Kabupaten Tana Toraja, Provinsi Sulawesi Selatan” J. Penelit. Kehutan. Wallacea, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 47–55, 2014. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. D. Race and J. Millar, Social and Community Dimensions to ACIAR Projects (ACIAR Training Manual). Canberra: Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  10. M. Iqbal, “Analisis Peran Pemangku Kepentingan dan Implementasinya Dalam Pembangunan Pertanian,” J. Litbang Pertan., vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 89–99, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  11. M. S. Reed. J. Environ. Manage., vol. 90, no. 5, pp. 1933–1949, 2009. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. P. Mushove and C. Vogel, Glob. Environ. Chang., vol. 15, pp. 184–198, 2005. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. I. Alviya, M. Salminah, V. B. Arifanti, R. Maryani, and E. Syahadat, “Persepsi Para Pemangku Kepentingan Terhadap Pengelolaan Lanskap Hutan di Daerah Aliran SUngai Tulang Bawang” J. Penelit. Sos. dan Ekon. Kehutan., vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 171–184, 2012. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Syahyuti, Partisipasi. Bogor: Pusat Analisis Sosial Ekonomi dan Kebijakan Pertanian, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  15. R. Sahai, “Community Participation in Environmental Management : Role of Women,” Int. Conf. Recent Res. Dev. Environ. Soc. Sci. Humanit., pp. 173–180, 2015. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.