Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 40, 2018
River Flow 2018 - Ninth International Conference on Fluvial Hydraulics
Article Number 03025
Number of page(s) 8
Section Hydraulic structures and their effects on bed, flow regime and ecology
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20184003025
Published online 05 September 2018
  1. Z. Cao, Z. Yue, G. Pender. Nat. Haz. 59, 2, 1021 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. J. E. Costa, Floods from dam failures, USGS Rep., 85-560, 54 (1985) [Google Scholar]
  3. C. Di Cristo, S. Evangelista, M. Greco, M. Iervolino, A. Leopardi, A. Vacca, J. Hydr.Res. (2017) [Google Scholar]
  4. B. Dewals, F. Rulot, S. Erpicum, P. Archambeau, M. Pirotton, Advanced topics insediment transport modelling: non-alluvial beds and hyperconcentrated flows, sedimenttransport (Intech, 2011) [Google Scholar]
  5. C. Di Cristo, M. Greco, M. Iervolino, A. Leopardi, A. Vacca, J. Hydr. Engrg. 142, 2,04015043 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. S. Evangelista, M. Greco, M. Iervolino, A. Leopardi, A. Vacca, Int. J. Sed. Res. 30, 4,382 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. J. Fry, A. Vogel, P. Royet, J. Courivaud, 6th International Conference on Scour andErosion (Paris, 2012) [Google Scholar]
  8. M. Greco, M. Iervolino, A. Leopardi, A. Vacca, Int. J. Sed. Res., 27, 4, 409 (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. M. Guan, N.G. Wright, P.A. Sleigh, J. Hydr. Engrg. 140, 7, 040140221 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  10. J.-M. Hervouet, Hydrodynamics of Free Surface Flows: Modelling with the FiniteElement Method (Wiley, 2007) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. B.E. Launder and B.I. Sharma, B. I. Letters in Heat and Mass Transfer, 1, 2, 131-138.(1974) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. G Michelazzo, Breaching of river levees: analytical flow modelling and experimentalhydro-morphodynamic investigations (PhD thesis, Univ. of Florence, Italy 2014), [Google Scholar]
  13. W.A. Morrissey, FEMA's Flood Hazard Map Modernization Initiative, CRS Report forCongress (Washington, DC, 2006) [Google Scholar]
  14. M. Pontillo, L. Schmocker, M. Greco, W.H Hager, J. Hydr. Res. 48, 5, 573 (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. I. Rifai, S. Erpicum, P. Archambeau, D. Violeau, M. Pirotton, K. El Kadi Abderrezzak, B. Dewals, Water Resour. Res. 53, 3373(2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Rosseau Y.Y., van de Wiel M.J., Biron P.M., Int. Conf. RiverFlow 2014 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  17. L. Schmocker, W.H. Hager, J. Hydraulic Res. 47, 5, 585 (2009) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. C. Swartenbroekx, S. Soares Frazão, R. Staquet, Y. Zech, J. Hydr. Res. 48, 3, 302 (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. C. Swartenbroekx, Y. Zech, S. Soares Frazão, Int. J. Num. Meth. Fluids, 73, 5, 477(2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. C. Volz, P. Rousselot, D. Vetch, R. Faeh, J. of Hydr. Res. 50, 6, 587 (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. S. Vorogushyn, B. Merz, K.E. Lindenschmidt, H. Apel, Water Resour. Res. 46, W08541(2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. W. Wu, S. S.-Y. Wang, J. Hydr. Engrg. 133, 1, 48 (2007) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.