Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 40, 2018
River Flow 2018 - Ninth International Conference on Fluvial Hydraulics
Article Number 06044
Number of page(s) 7
Section Extreme events
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20184006044
Published online 05 September 2018
  1. Iverson, R.M., George, D.L., Allstadt, K., Reid, M.E., Collins, B.D., Vallance, J.W., Schilling, S.P., Godt, J.W., Cannon, C.M., Magirl, C.S., Baum, R.L., Coe, J.A., Schulz, W.H., Bower, J.B., 2015. Landslide mobility and hazards: Implications of the 2014 Oso disaster. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 412, 197-208. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Agurto-Detzel, H., Bianchi, M., Assumpcao, M., Schimmel, M., Collaco, B., Ciardelli, C., Barbosa, J.R., Calhau, J., 2016. The tailings dam failure of 5 November 2015 in SE Brazil and its preceding seismic sequence. Geophys. Res. Lett. 43. [Google Scholar]
  3. Wilcox, A.C., O'Connor, J.E., Major, J.J., 2014. Rapid reservoir erosion, hyperconcentrated flow, and downstream deposition triggered by breaching of 38 m tall Condit Dam, White Salmon River, Washington. J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surf. 119. [Google Scholar]
  4. Kirschbaum, D., Adler, R., Adler, D., Peters-Lidard, C., Huffman, G., 2012. Global Distribution of Extreme Precipitations and High-Impact Landslides in 2010 Relative to Previous Years. J. Hydrometeorol. 13, 1536-1551. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Allan, R.P., Soden, B.J., 2008. Atmospheric Warming and the Amplification of Extreme Events. Science 321, 1481-1484. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Viers, J.H., 2011. Hydropower Relicensing and Climate Change. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 47(4), 655-661. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Santoy Resources LTD, 2009. Technical Report on the Coles Hill Uranium Property Pittsylvania County, Virginia, United States of America, NI 43-101. Santoy Resources, British Columbia, Canada. [Google Scholar]
  8. Gannon, J.P., Burbey, T.J., Bodnar, R.J., Aylor, J., 2012. Geophysical and geochemical characterization of the groundwater system and the role of the Chatham Fault in groundwater movement at the Coles Hill uranium deposit, Virginia, USA. Hydrogeology Journal 20, 45-60. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kingston, W.J., Castro-Bolinaga, C.F., Zavaleta, E., Diplas, P., 2012. Probable maximum flood inundation modeling: a case study in southern Virginia, in: Murillo, R. (Ed.), Proc. River Flow 2012, San Jose, Costa Rica, September 5-7, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  10. Castro-Bolinaga, C.F., Diplas, P., 2014. Hydraulic Modeling of Extreme Hydrologic Events: Case Study in Southern Virginia. J. Hydraul. Eng. 05014007. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Castro-Bolinaga, C.F., Zavaleta, E., Diplas, P., 2014. A coupled modeling effort to study the fate of contaminated sediments downstream of the Coles Hill deposit, Virginia, USA, in: Proc. Sediment Dynamics from the Summit to the Sea, IAHS Publication 367, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, December 11-14, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  12. Levitan, D. M., Schreiber, M. E., Seal, R. R., II, Bodnar, R. J., Aylor, J. G., 2014. Developing protocols for geochemical baseline studies: An example from the Coles Hill uranium deposit, Virginia, USA. Appl. Geochem. 43, 88-100. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Levitan, D.M., Zipper, C.E., Donovan, P., Schreiber, M.E., Seal, R.R., II, Engle, M.A., Chermak, J.A., Bodnar, R.J., Johnson, D.K., Aylor, J.G., Jr., 2015. Statistical analysis of soil geochemical data to identify pathfinder elements associated with mineral deposits: an example from the Coles Hill uranium deposit, Virginia, USA. Journal of Geochemical Exploration 154, 238-251.Tappa et al., 2014 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. US Geological Survey National Hydrography Dataset (USGS NHD), 2007. Available on-line at: http://nhd.usgs.gov/ (Jun. 23, 2014). [Google Scholar]
  15. Gesch, D., Oimoen, M., Greenlee, S., Nelson, C., Steuck, M., Tyler, D., 2002. The national elevation dataset. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 68(1), 5-11. [Google Scholar]
  16. Gesch, D.B. (2007). The national elevation dataset. Digital elevation model technologies and applications: The DEM users' manual. American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Bethesda, MD, USA. [Google Scholar]
  17. Castro-Bolinaga, C.F., P. Diplas, and R.J. Bodnar, 2016. Dynamic vs. quasi-steady modeling of morphodynamic processes: A physics-based selection criterion. In: River Flow 2016, IAHR, Constantinescu, G., Garcia, M., and Hanes, D. (Eds.), 1184-1192, St. Louis, MO, USA, 12-15 Jul. 2016. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.