Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 53, 2018
2018 3rd International Conference on Advances in Energy and Environment Research (ICAEER 2018)
Article Number 04043
Number of page(s) 5
Section Environmental Protection, Pollution and Treatment
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20185304043
Published online 14 September 2018
  1. Ming, F, Jun, L. Research progress and debate on ecological compensation theory-based on ecological social relations. China's population resources and environment, 2017 (03): 130-137. [Google Scholar]
  2. Min, F, Lin, M. Reconstruction of Financial Transfer Payment System in China's Ecological Function Area: Based on Extensive Emergy Model Measuring Ecological Spillover Value, Economic Research, 2015(03): 47-61. [Google Scholar]
  3. Li, F., et al., Application of game model for stakeholder management in construction of ecological corridors: A case study on Yangtze River Basin in China. Habitat International,. 2017. 63: 113-121. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ji, P., X. Ma and G. Li, Developing green purchasing relationships for the manufacturing industry: An evolutionary game theory perspective. International Journal of Production Economics,. 2015. 166: 155-162. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Sheng, J., et al., An evolutionary modeling approach for designing a contractual REDD+ payment scheme. Ecological Indicators, 2017. 79: p. 276-285. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. .Li F, Pan B, Wu Y, et al. Application of game model for stakeholder management in construction of ecological corridors: A case study on Yangtze River Basin in China[J]. Habitat International,. 2017, 63: 113-121. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Engel S, Palmer C. Payments for environmental services as an alternative to logging under weak property rights: The case of Indonesia ☆[J]. Ecological Economics, 2008, 65(4): 799-809. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ji P, Ma X, Li G. Developing green purchasing relationships for the manufacturing industry: An evolutionary game theory perspective[J]. International Journal of Production Economics,. 2015, 166: 155-162. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Fan J. Local Linear Regression Smoothers and Their Minimax Efficiencies[J]. Annals of Statistics, 1993, 21(1): 196-216. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Farrell K N. Intellectual mercantilism and franchise equity: A critical study of the ecological political economy of international payments for ecosystem services[J]. Ecological Economics, 2014, 102(2): 137-146. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lera-López, F., et al., Rural environment stakeholders and policy making: Willingness to pay to reduce road transportation pollution impact in the Western Pyrenees. Transportation Research Part D Transport & Environment,. 2014. 32: 129-142. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Turner, R.K., et al., Valuing nature: lessons learned and future research directions ☆. Ecological Economics, 2003. 46(3): p. 493-510. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.