Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 54, 2018
25th Salt Water Intrusion Meeting (SWIM 2018)
Article Number 00040
Number of page(s) 6
Published online 17 September 2018
  1. Auken, E., Christiansen, A. V., Jacobsen, L. H., & Sørensen, K. I. 2008. A resolution study of buried valleys using laterally constrained inversion of TEM data. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 65(1), 10–20. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Van Baaren, E. S., Delsman, J. R., Karaoulis, M., Pauw, P. S., Vermaas, T., Bootsma, H., … Meyer, U. 2018. FRESHEM Zeeland FREsh Salt groundwater distribution by Helicopter ElectroMagnetic survey in the Province of Zeeland. Deltares report 1209220. Utrecht, Netherlands. [Google Scholar]
  3. van Baaren, E. S., De Lange, G., Vermeulen, P. T. M., & Vonhögen Peeters, L. 2015. Exploring groundwater resources on Jurong Island, Singapore; Monitoring, modelling and assessing risks (PUB report). [Google Scholar]
  4. Bironne, A., Saha, A., Lee, W. K., Babovic, V., Vonhogen, L., van Baaren, E. S., … Hoogendoorn, B. 2017. Utilization of reclaimed land as groundwater reservoir. In 14th Annual Meeting Asia Oceania Gesciences Society, 6–11 Augustus. [Google Scholar]
  5. De Breuck, W., De Moor, G., Maréchal, R., & Tavernier, R. 1974. Diepte van het grensvlak tussen zoet en zout water in de freatische laag van het Belgische kustgebied (1963-1973). Verziltingskaart. Brussel, Militair Geografisch Instituut. [Google Scholar]
  6. De Breuck, W., De Moor, G., Maréchal, R. & Tavernier R. 1989. Diepte van het grensvlak tussen zoet en zout water in de freatische watervoerende laag van noordelijk Vlaanderen (1974-1975). [Google Scholar]
  7. Cliwat. (2011). Groundwater in a Future Climate. [Google Scholar]
  8. Delsman, J. R., De Paz, J. M., De Klerk, M., Stuyt, L., De Louw, P. G. B., Visconti, F., … Pecora, S. 2015. Application of the FWOO method in the Vega Baja Segura catchment Application of the FWOO method in the Vega Baja Segura catchment. Deltares Rapport 1220325, 98. [Google Scholar]
  9. Delsman, J. R., Van Baaren, E. S., Karaoulis, M., Pauw, P. S., Vermaas, T., Bootsma, H., … Revil, A. 2018. Large-scale, probabilistic airborne EM mapping provides detailed view of groundwater salinity in the province of Zeeland, Netherlands. To Be Submitted to Environmental Research Letters. [Google Scholar]
  10. Delsman, J. R., Van Boekel, E., Reinhard, S., Van Loon, A., Bartholomeus, R., Mulder, M., … Schasfoort, F. 2017. Regioscan Zoetwatermaatregelen, Verkennen van het perspectief van kleinschalige zoetwatermaatregelen voor de regionale zoetwateropgave. [Google Scholar]
  11. Faneca Sànchez, M., Gunnink, J. L., van Baaren, E. S., Oude Essink, G. H. P., Auken, E., Elderhorst, W., & De Louw, P. G. B. 2012. Modelling climate change effects on a Dutch coastal groundwater system using airborne electromagnetic measurements. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 16(12), 4499–4516. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ferguson, G., & Gleeson, T. 2012. Vulnerability of coastal aquifers to groundwater use and climate change. Nature Climate Change, 2(5), 342–345. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Giambastiani, B. M. S., Antonellini, M., Oude Essink, G. H. P., & Stuurman, R. J. 2007. Saltwater intrusion in the unconfined coastal aquifer of Ravenna (Italy): A numerical model. Journal of Hydrology, 340(1–2), 91–104. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Oude Essink, G. H. P., van Baaren, E. S., & De Louw, P. G. B. 2010. Effects of climate change on coastal groundwater systems: A modeling study in the Netherlands. Water Resources Research, 46(May), 1–16. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Oude Essink, G. H. P., Van Baaren, E. S., Zuurbier, K. G., Velstra, J., Veraart, J., Brouwer, W., … Schroevers, M. 2014. GO-FRESH: Valorisatie kansrijke oplossingen voor robuuste zoetwatervoorziening, KvK rapport (in Dutch). [Google Scholar]
  16. Pauw, P. S., De Louw, P. G. B., & Oude Essink, G. H. P. 2012. Groundwater salinisation in the Wadden Sea area of the Netherlands: quantifying the effects of climate change , sea-level rise and anthropogenic interferences. Netherlands Journal of Geosciences Geologie En Mijnbouw, 91–3(3), 373–383. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Pauw, P. S., Van Baaren, E. S., Visser, M., De Louw, P. G. B., & Oude Essink, G. H. P. 2015. Increasing a freshwater lens below a creek ridge using a controlled artificial recharge and drainage system: a case study in the Netherlands. Hydrogeology Journal. [Google Scholar]
  18. Rasmussen, P., Sonnenborg, T. O., Goncear, G., & Hinsby, K. 2013. Assessing impacts of climate change, sea level rise, and drainage canals on saltwater intrusion to coastal aquifer. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 17(1), 421–443. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Schaars, F., & Rolf, H. 2014. SkyTEM PWN: Eindrapportage van het airborne geofysisch onderzoek Noordhollands Duinreservaat PWN. [Google Scholar]
  20. Steuer, A., Siemon, B., & Auken, E. 2009. A comparison of helicopter-borne electromagnetics in frequencyand time-domain at the Cuxhaven valley in Northern Germany. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 67(3), 194–205. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Vandenbohede, A., Luyten, K., & Lebbe, L. C. 2008. Effects of Global Change on Heterogeneous Coastal Aquifers: A Case Study in Belgium. Journal of Coastal Research, 24, 160–170. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Viezzoli, A., Auken, E., & Munday, T. 2009. Spatially constrained inversion for quasi 3D modelling of airborne electromagnetic data an application for environmental assessment in the Lower Murray Region of South Australia. Exploration Geophysics, 40(2), 173–183. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Yang, J., Graf, T., & Ptak, T. 2015. Impact of climate change on freshwater resources in a heterogeneous coastal aquifer of Bremerhaven, Germany: A three-dimensional modeling study. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 177–178, 107–121. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.