EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 56 (2018) E3S Web Conf., 56 (2018) 01008 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 56, 2018
VII International Scientific Conference “Problems of Complex Development of Georesources” (PCDG 2018)
Article Number 01008
Number of page(s) 6
Section Geotechnological Problems of Development of Subsoil
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20185601008
Published online 26 September 2018
  1. Lund, J.W., Boyd, T.L. Direct utilization of geothermal energy 2015 worldwide review. Geothermics 60, 66-93. (2016). doi:10.1016/j.geothermics.2015.11.004. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bertani, R. Geothermal power generation in the world 2010-2014 update report. Geothermics 60, 31-43. (2016). doi:10.1016/j.geothermics.2015.11.003. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bertani R. Geothermal energy: an overview on resources and potential // International Geothermal Days. - Slovakia, (2009). [Google Scholar]
  4. SHulyupin A.N. Voprosy gidravliki parovodyanoj smesi pri osvoenii geotermal'nyh mestorozhdenij. - Vladivostok: Dal'nauka. 262 s. (2011). [Google Scholar]
  5. Earth sciences. - Paris:UNESCO, 12. (1973). [Google Scholar]
  6. Lee K.C., Jenks D.G. Ohaaki geothermal steam transmission pipelines // Proceedings, 11-th New Zealand Geothermal Workshop. P. 25-30. (1989) [Google Scholar]
  7. Wigly D.M. Separation plant and pipework design - Ohaaki steam field // Proceedings, 11-th New Zealand Geothermal Workshop.P. 19-24. (1989). [Google Scholar]
  8. Delnov Y., Shulyupin A. Geothermal power generation in Kamchatka, Russia // Geothermal Resources Council Transactions. - Portland. 20. P. 733-736. (1996). [Google Scholar]
  9. Zhao H.D., Lee K.C., Freeston D.H. Proceedings, World Geothermal Congress 2000. Kyushu-Tohoku. P. 3349-3353. (2000). [Google Scholar]
  10. Ghaderi I. Comprehensive comparison between transmission two-phase flow in one line and two line separately for 50 MWe power plant in Sabalan, Iran. In: Proceedings of the World Geothermal Congress. Bali, Indonesia, no. 2501 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  11. Rizaldy, S.J. Zarrouk. Pressure drop in large diameter geothermal two-phase pipelines // Proceedings 38th New Zealand Geothermal Workshop. - New Zealand. P. 1-5. (2016). [Google Scholar]
  12. A. Garcia-Gutierrez, J.I. Martinez-Estrella, R. Ovando-Castelar, A. Vazquez-Sandoval, C. Rosales-López. Thermal Efficiency of the Los Humeros Geothermal Field Fluid Transportation Network. Proceedings World Geothermal Congress 2015 Melbourne, Australia, 19-25 April 2015, no. 25007. (2015). [Google Scholar]
  13. H.S. Cheik, H.A. Ali. Prefeasibility design of single flash in Asal geothermal power plant 2x25 MW, Djibouti. Proceedings World Geothermal Congress 2015 Melbourne, Australia, 19-25 April 2015, no. 25030. (2015). [Google Scholar]
  14. SHulyupin A.N., CHermoshenceva A.A. Model' dispersno-kol'cevogo potoka v geotermal'noj skvazhine // Dinamika geterogennyh sred v geotekhnologicheskom proizvodstve. Petropavlovsk-Kamchatskij: Izd-vo KGARF. S. 23-35. (1998). [Google Scholar]
  15. Aleksandrov A.A. Sistema uravnenij IFPWS-IF 97 dlya vychisleniya termodinamicheskih svojstv vody i vodyanogo para v promyshlennyh raschetah. CH. 1. Osnovnye uravneniya // Teploehnergetika. No. 9. S. 69-77. (1998). [Google Scholar]
  16. Shulyupin, A.N. Steam-water flow instability in geothermal wells. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 105, 290-295. (2017). doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2016.09.092. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.