Open Access
| Issue |
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 66, 2018
AG 2018 - 4th International Conference on Applied Geophysics
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 01005 | |
| Number of page(s) | 10 | |
| Section | Geophysics in Geoengineering | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20186601005 | |
| Published online | 26 November 2018 | |
- R. Rickman, M.J. Mullen, J.E. Petre, W.V. Grieser, D. Kundert, A Practical Use of Shale Petrophysics for Stimulation Design Optimization: All Shale Plays Are Not Clones of the Barnett Shale, SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, paper SPE-115258-MS, 840-850 (2008) [Google Scholar]
- D. Gray, P. Anderson, J. Logel, F. Delbecq, D. Schmidt, R. Schmid, Estimation of stress and geomechanical properties using 3D seismic data, First Break 30, 3, 59-68 (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- W.S. Dershowitz, H.H. Herda, Interpretation of fracture spacing and intensity. In: J.R. Tillerson and W.R. Wawersik (eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd U.S. Symposium on Rock Mechanics, A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, 757-766 (1992) [Google Scholar]
- Gavăt, I. Cornea, A. Gheorghe, R. Gaspar, L. Tomescu, La structure du soubassement moesien entre le Danube et les rivieres du Ialomiţa, Buzău et Siret, Revue Roumaine de Geologie, Geophysique et Geographie, Serie Geophysique 11, 1, 23-32 (1967) [Google Scholar]
- M. Săndulescu, Geotectonics of Romania (in Romanian), Technical Publishing House, Bucharest, 336 pp. (1984) [Google Scholar]
- M. Tărăpoancă, Architecture, 3D geometry and tectonic evolution of the Carpathians foreland basin, Ph.D. Thesis, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, ISBN 90-9017847-3 (2004) [Google Scholar]
- I. Balintoni, C. Balica, Peri-Amazonian provenance of the Euxinic Craton components in Dobrogea and of the North Dobrogean Orogen components (Romania): A detrital zircon study, Precambrian Research 278, 34-51 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- J.-C. Hippolyte, Geodynamics of Dobrogea (Romania): new constraints on the evolution of the Tornquist-Teisseyre Line, the Black Sea and the Carpathians, Tectonophysics 357, 33-53 (2002) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- O. Mirăuţă, E. Mirăuţă, The Paleozoic from the southern part of the Măcin Mountains (Cerna-Hamcearca region) (in Romanian). Dări de Seamă ale Şedinţelor Comitetului Geologic (1958-1959), XLVI, 129-142 (1962) [Google Scholar]
- O. Mirăuţă, Contributions to the knowledge of the Paleozoic Formations from the southern part of the Măcin Mountains (in Romanian). Studii şi Cercetări de Geologie, Geografie şi Geofizică, Seria Geol. 11, 2, 497-512 (1966) [Google Scholar]
- D. Patrulius, E. Mirăuţă, M. Mureşan, M. Iordan, Stratigraphic and structural sinthesis of North Dobrogea. I. Paleozoic formations (in Romanian), Unpublished report, Archives of the Geological Institute of Romania, Bucharest (1973) [Google Scholar]
- C.-C. Lee, C.-H. Lee, H.-F. Yeh, H.-I. Lin, Modeling spatial fracture intensity as a control on flow in fractured rock, Environmental Earth Sciences 63, 6, 1199-1211 (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- M.D. Zoback, D. Moos, L.G. Mastin, R.N. Anderson, Well bore breakouts and in situ stress, Journal of Geophysical Research 90 (B7), 5523-5530 (1985) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- R.A. Plumb, S.H. Hickman, Stress-induced borehole elongation: A comparison between the Four-Arm Dipmeter and the Borehole Televiewer in the Auburn Geothermal Well, Journal of Geophysical Research 90 (B7), 5513-5521 (1985) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- B.S. Aadnoy, Inversion technique to determine the in-situ stress field from fracturing data, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 4, 127-141 (1990) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- B.S. Aadnoy, J.S. Bell, Classification of drilling-induced fractures and their relationship to in-situ stress directions, The Log Analyst 39, 6, 27-42 (1998) [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.