Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 67, 2018
The 3rd International Tropical Renewable Energy Conference “Sustainable Development of Tropical Renewable Energy” (i-TREC 2018)
Article Number 02017
Number of page(s) 5
Section Bioenergy
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20186702017
Published online 26 November 2018
  1. Gougazeh, M., & Buhl, J.-Ch. (2014). Synthesis and characterization of zeolite a by hydrothermal transformation of Natural Jordanian Kaolin. Journal of the Association of Arab Universities for Basic and Applied Science, 15, 35–42. [Google Scholar]
  2. Syukuri Nikmah, R.A., Nurul Widiastuti, & Hamzah Fansuri. (2008). The effect of time and comparison of Si/Al to the formation of Zeolite A from free carbon basic ash from PLTU PT IPMOMI with hydrothermal methods. Journal of Indonesia Zeolites, Vol. 7 No. 1. [Google Scholar]
  3. Ayele, Lijalem, Joaquin Perez-Pariente, Yonas Chebude, Isabel Diaz. (2015). Synthesis of Zeolite A from Ethiopian Kaolin. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 215, 29–36. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Krieger, T., Martig, D.S., van den Brink, E., & Berger, T. (2016). Working on self-compassion online: A proof of concept and feasibility study. Internet Interventions, 6, 64–70. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Liaquat, A. M., Kalam, M.A., Masjuki, H. H., & Jayed, M. H. (2010). Potential emissions reduction in road transport sector using biofuel in developing countries. Atmospheric Environment, 44 (32), 3869–3877. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Saputra, Rodhie. (2006). Utilization of synthetic zeolites as an alternative of industrial waste processing. [Google Scholar]
  7. Ibrahim, H.S., Jamil, T.S., & Hegazy, E.Z. (2010). Application of zeolite prepared from Egyptian Kaolin for the removal of heavy metals: II (isoterm models. Journal of Hazardous Materials, Vol. 182 (1-3), pp 842–847. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Goldman, M., Fraenkel, D., & Gideon, L. (2003). A zeolite/polymer membrane for separation of ethanolwater azeotrope. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 37 (7), pp 1791–1800. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Schwender, J.D., Holly, L.T., Rouben, D.P., & Foley, K. T. (2005). Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): technical feasibility and initial results. Clinical Spine Surgery, 18, S1–S6. [Google Scholar]
  10. Pollock, J., Ho, S. V., & Farid, S. S. (2013). Fedbatch and perfusion culture processes: Economic, environmental, and operational feasibility under uncertainty. Biotechnology and bioengineering, 110 (1), 206–219. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Roy, A., & Mukherjee, K. (2017). Entrepreneurial Education in India. International Journal of Advanced Engineering and Management, 2(1), 15–20. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Adams, J., Khan, H. T., Raeside, R., & White, D. I. (2007). Research methods for graduate business and social science students. SAGE publications India. [Google Scholar]
  13. Yousuf, Tawfiq Abdul Rahim. (2002). Management of small business. Amman: Dar Safa'a for publishing and distribution. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.