Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 92, 2019
7th International Symposium on Deformation Characteristics of Geomaterials (IS-Glasgow 2019)
Article Number 01009
Number of page(s) 5
Section Laboratory Experimental Techniques: Particle Scale and Fabric
Published online 25 June 2019
  1. W.D. Carrier, J.F. Beckman. Géotechnique, 35, 2:223-229. (1985) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. M. Sánchez, A. Gens, S. Olivella. Thermo-hydro-mechanical modelling of low permeability media using a double-porosity formulation. Mecânica Computacional. XXIII, pp. 733-754 (2004) [Google Scholar]
  3. E. Romero, Engineering Geology, 165, 24, (2013) [Google Scholar]
  4. B. Zhang, W.I. Liu, X. Li. Applied Surface Science. 253:1349-1355 (2006) [Google Scholar]
  5. P. Delage, G. Lefebvre. F Geotechnical Journal, 21: 21-35 (1984) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. F.J. Griffiths, R.C. Joshi. Géotechnique, 39 (1): 159-167. (1989) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. P. Delage, M. Audiguier, Y.J. Cui, M.D. Howatt. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 33: 150-158. (1996) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. D. Penumadu, J. Dean. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 37: 393-405 (2000) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. P.H. Simms, E.K. Yanful. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 38: 741-754 (2001) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. C.M.B. Buenfil. Caracterización Experimental del Comportamiento Hidromecánico de uma Arcilla Compactada. Thesis, Departamento de Engenharia de Terreno e Cartografia, Universidade Politécnica da Catalunia, Barcelona, 466 p. (2007) [Google Scholar]
  11. E. Romero, P.H. Simms. Geotechnical Geol. Engineering. 26, 6:705-727 (2008) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. M.M.A. Mascarenha. Influencia da microestrutura no comportamento hidromecânico de uma argila siltoso não saturada incluindo pequenas deformações. Tese de Doutorado, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, 158p. (2008) [Google Scholar]
  13. A. Koliji, L. Vulliet, L. Laloui. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 47: 297-311 (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. V. Sivakumar, R. Sivakumar, J. Boyd, P. Mackinnon. Géotechnique, 60, 8: 581-594 (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. E.E. Alonso, N.M. Pinyol, A. Gens. Géotechnique, 63, 6: 463-478 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. E.E. Alonso, J. Vaunat, A. Gens. Engineering Geology, 54: 173-183 (1999) [Google Scholar]
  17. B. Lloret, N. Khalili. International Journal for Numerical Analytical Methods Geomechanics, 24: 893-927 (2000) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. P.H. Simms, E.K. Yanful. Géotechnique, 54, 6: 421-426 (2004) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. S. Prapaharan, A.G. Altschaeffl, B.J. Dempsey. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 111, 9: 1139-1143 (1985) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. E. Romero. Characterisation and Thermo Hydro-mechanical Behaviour of Unsaturated Boom Clay: An Experimental Study. Thesis, Universidade Politécnica da Catalunia, Barcelona. 405p. (1999) [Google Scholar]
  21. K.K. Aung, H. Rahardjo, E.C. Leong, D.G. Toll. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 19: 401-416 (2001) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. P.H. Simms, E.K. Yanful. Géotechnique, 52, 4: 269-278 (2002) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. P.H. Simms, E.K. Yanful. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 42: 499-514 (2005) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. M. Al-Mukhtar, N. Balanteur, D. Tessier, S.K. Vanapalli. Applied Clay Science. 11:99-115 (1996) [Google Scholar]
  25. Y. Cui, M. Yahia-Aissa, P. Delage. Engineering Geology, 64, 233-250 (2002) [Google Scholar]
  26. O. Cuisinier, L. Laloui. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics. 28, 6:483-499 (2004) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. E. Romero, C. Hoffmann, E. Castellanos, J. Suriol, Advances in 157 Understanding Engineered Clay Barriers. 193-202 (2005) [Google Scholar]
  28. A. Koliji, L. Laloui, O. Cuisinier, O., Vulliet, L. Transport in Porous Media, 64 (2): 261-278 (2006) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. C. Hoffmann, E.E. Alonso, E. Romero. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 32: 832-849 (2007) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. A. Tarantino, E. De Col. Geotechnique, 58: 199-213 (2008) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. E.V. Vazquez, R.G. Moreno, A.M. Tarquis, A.S. Requejo, J.M. Mirás-Avalos, J. Paz-Ferreiro. Multifractal characterization of pore size distributions measured by mercury intrusion porosimetry. 19th World Congress of Soil Science, Soil Solutions for a Changing World, published on DVD (2010) [Google Scholar]
  32. S. Ahmed, C.W. Lovell, S. Diamond. Journal Geotechnical Engineering Div. GT 4, 407-425(1974) [Google Scholar]
  33. E.E. Alonso, A. Lloret, A. Gens. Proc. 1st Int. Conf. Unsaturated Soils, 1: 11-16 (1995) [Google Scholar]
  34. E. Romero, J. Vaunat. Experimental Evidence and Theoretical Approaches in Unsaturated Soils. 91-106 (2000) [Google Scholar]
  35. J. Camapum de Carvalho; J.J. Crispel; C. Mieussens; & A. Nardone. La Reconstitution Des Eprouvettes En Laboratoire: Theorie e Pratique Operatoire. RAPPORT DE RECHERCHE, LPC Paris, 145(1): 1-53. (1987). [Google Scholar]
  36. P. Delage, F.M. Pellerin. Clay Miner. 19, 2, 151-160. (1984) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. S. Sasanian, T. Newson. Engineering Geology, 158: 15-22. (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. W. Durner. Water Resourses Res., 30: 211-223 (1994). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. M. van Genutchen. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 44: 892-898 (1980) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. B.C.F.L. Lopes, A. Tarantino, M.P. Cordão Neto. An approach to detect micro-and macro-porosity from mip data. Unsaturated soils : research & applications : proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Unsaturated Soils, UNSAT 2014, 685-690 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  41. C.R. Borges, Estudo microestrutural do comportamento hidromecânico do solo de Brasília-DF, Tese de Doutorado, Universidade de Brasília, Faculdade de Tecnologia. Departamento de Engenharia Civil e Ambiental, xxxii, 112p. (2014) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.