A method for predicting the influence of matric suction changes on CPT tip resistance

Gerald A. Miller; Rodney W. Collins

doi:10.1051/e3sconf/20199218005

All issues

Volume 92 (2019)

E3S Web Conf., 92 (2019) 18005

References

Open Access

Issue		E3S Web Conf. Volume 92, 2019 7^th International Symposium on Deformation Characteristics of Geomaterials (IS-Glasgow 2019)


Article Number		18005
Number of page(s)		6
Section		Integrated Laboratory/Site Investigations, Geophysical Methods and Field Monitoring
DOI		https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20199218005
Published online		25 June 2019

ASTM. D5778-12 Standard test method for electronic friction cone and piezocone penetration testing of soils. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, 4, 1587-1605 (2012) [Google Scholar]
P.K. Robertson, R.G. Campanella. Interpretation of cone penetration tests. Part I: Sand. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 20(4), 718-733 (1983) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
P.K. Robertson, R.G. Campanella. Interpretation of cone penetration tests. Part II: Clay. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 20(4), 734-745 (1983) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
P.W. Mayne, J.B. Kemper. Profiling OCR in stiff clays by CPT and SPT. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 11(2), 139-147 (1988). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
P.K. Robertson. Interpretation of cone penetration tests-a unified approach. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 46(11), 1337-1355 (2009) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
S.R. Saye, A.J. Lutenegger, J. Santos, B.P. Kumm. Assessing overconsolidation ratios in soil with piezocone: referencing soil index properties. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental engineering, 139(7), 1075-1085 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
P.K. Robertson. Cone penetration test (CPT)-based soil behaviour type (SBT) classification system-an update. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 53(12), 1910-1927 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
C.E. Zapata, W.N. Houston, S.L. Houston, K.D. Walsh. Soil-water characteristic curve variability. ASCE, GSP 99, 84-124 (2000) [Google Scholar]
H.T. Durgunoglu, J.K. Mitchell. Static penetration resistance of soils. For NASA Grant NGR 05-003-406: Lunar Soil Properties and Soil Mechanics, Space Sciences Laboratory Series 14, Issue 24, UC Berkeley, 223 p. (1973) [Google Scholar]
S.K. Vanapalli, D.G. Fredlund, D.E. Pufahl, A.W. Clifton. Model for the prediction of shear strength with respect to soil suction. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 33(3), 379-392 (1996) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
D.G. Fredlund, A. Xing. Equations for the soil-water characteristic curve. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 31(4), 521-532 (1994) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
B. Hansen. A general formula for bearing capacity. Danish Geotechnical Institute, Bulletin, 11, 38-46 (1961) [Google Scholar]
G.A. Miller, R.W. Collins, N.K. Tan, K.K. Muraleetharan. Cone penetration testing in unsaturated soils. Transportation Geotechnics, 17, 85-99 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
H.S. Yu, J.K. Mitchell. Analysis of cone resistance: review of methods. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 124(2), 140-149 (1998) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.

[1] ASTM. D5778-12 Standard test method for electronic friction cone and piezocone penetration testing of soils. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, 4, 1587-1605 (2012) [Google Scholar]

[2] P.K. Robertson, R.G. Campanella. Interpretation of cone penetration tests. Part I: Sand. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 20(4), 718-733 (1983) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

[3] P.K. Robertson, R.G. Campanella. Interpretation of cone penetration tests. Part II: Clay. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 20(4), 734-745 (1983) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

[4] P.W. Mayne, J.B. Kemper. Profiling OCR in stiff clays by CPT and SPT. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 11(2), 139-147 (1988). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

[5] P.K. Robertson. Interpretation of cone penetration tests-a unified approach. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 46(11), 1337-1355 (2009) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

[6] S.R. Saye, A.J. Lutenegger, J. Santos, B.P. Kumm. Assessing overconsolidation ratios in soil with piezocone: referencing soil index properties. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental engineering, 139(7), 1075-1085 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

[7] P.K. Robertson. Cone penetration test (CPT)-based soil behaviour type (SBT) classification system-an update. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 53(12), 1910-1927 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

[8] C.E. Zapata, W.N. Houston, S.L. Houston, K.D. Walsh. Soil-water characteristic curve variability. ASCE, GSP 99, 84-124 (2000) [Google Scholar]

[9] H.T. Durgunoglu, J.K. Mitchell. Static penetration resistance of soils. For NASA Grant NGR 05-003-406: Lunar Soil Properties and Soil Mechanics, Space Sciences Laboratory Series 14, Issue 24, UC Berkeley, 223 p. (1973) [Google Scholar]

[10] S.K. Vanapalli, D.G. Fredlund, D.E. Pufahl, A.W. Clifton. Model for the prediction of shear strength with respect to soil suction. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 33(3), 379-392 (1996) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

[11] D.G. Fredlund, A. Xing. Equations for the soil-water characteristic curve. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 31(4), 521-532 (1994) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

[12] B. Hansen. A general formula for bearing capacity. Danish Geotechnical Institute, Bulletin, 11, 38-46 (1961) [Google Scholar]

[13] G.A. Miller, R.W. Collins, N.K. Tan, K.K. Muraleetharan. Cone penetration testing in unsaturated soils. Transportation Geotechnics, 17, 85-99 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

[14] H.S. Yu, J.K. Mitchell. Analysis of cone resistance: review of methods. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 124(2), 140-149 (1998) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]