Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 110, 2019
International Science Conference SPbWOSCE-2018 “Business Technologies for Sustainable Urban Development”
Article Number 02092
Number of page(s) 17
Section Environmental Management and Economics
Published online 09 August 2019
  1. (Last accessed: 09.10.2017) [Google Scholar]
  2. (Last accessed: 13.09.2018) [Google Scholar]
  3. (Last accessed: 13.09.2018) [Google Scholar]
  4. (Last accessed: 13.09.2018) [Google Scholar]
  5. L. Lysienkova, V. Likholetov, E. Baranova, Economics and management of innovative technologies, Virtual tour as a marketing tool in tourism, 1 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  6. J. Bower, C. Christensen, C. M., The Journal of Product Innovation Management, Disruptive technologies: Catching the wave, 1(13), 75-76 (1996) [Google Scholar]
  7. (Last accessed: 23.11.2018) [Google Scholar]
  8. E. Rot, Vestnik McKinsey, Innovation is the path to effectiveness, 21 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  9. - (Last accessed: 13.04.2017) [Google Scholar]
  10. (Last accessed: 22.11.2018) [Google Scholar]
  11. E. Swanson, Management science, Information systems innovation among organizations, 40, №9, 1069-1092 (1994) [Google Scholar]
  12. B. Brancheau, N. Maslennikova, V. Mishin, Innovation management, 1, 367 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  13. (Last accessed: 04.05.2017) [Google Scholar]
  14. R. Fedosova, S. Pimenov, Bulletin of the Financial University, Modern tools for evaluating the effectiveness of innovative projects, 5 (2009) [Google Scholar]
  15. Statistical Office of the European Communities. Oslo Manual: Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data. - OECD Publishing, 1997 [Google Scholar]
  16. Y. Schumpeter, Theory of economic development. Capitalism, socialism and democracy, 864 (2008) [Google Scholar]
  17. A. Anisina, A. Dagaev, Innovation management, 528 (2009) [Google Scholar]
  18. E. Kozlovskaya, D. Demidenko, E. Yakovleva, Economics and innovation management, 359, (2012) [Google Scholar]
  19. B. Santo, Innovation as a means of economic development, 296 (1990) [Google Scholar]
  20. V. Medynsky, Innovation management, 295 (2008) [Google Scholar]
  21. A. Barysheva, V. Baldin, I. Peredereev, R. Heads N. Kochkin, Innovation, 382 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  22. V. Glukhov, S. Korobko, T. Marinina, Knowledge economy, 528 (2003) [Google Scholar]
  23. B. Twiss, Management of scientific and technical innovations (1989) [Google Scholar]
  24. L. M. Gohberg, Organization for economic cooperation and development. The Frascati Manual. Measurement of scientific and technical activities: Proposed standard practice for surveys of research and experiments development, Organization for economic cooperation and development; translation and scientific Paris: OECD, 277 p. (Moscow CISN publishing house, 1995) [Google Scholar]
  25. H. Edison, N. Bin Ali, R. Torkar, Journal of Systems and Software, Towards innovation measurement in the software industry, 86, 5, 1390-1407 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. A. Portnov, Information technology innovations - the basis of production management efficiency: dissertations of candidate of economic sciences, 197 (2004) [Google Scholar]
  27. O. Weisman, Information and technological innovations in the management of the territorial educational system: dissertations of candidate of economic sciences, 179 (2005) [Google Scholar]
  28. V. Grover, K. Fiedler, J. Teng, Information systems research, Empirical evidence on Swanson’s tri-core model of information systems innovation, 8, 3, 273-287 (1997) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. G. Mutanov, J. Esengalieva, Fundamental research, The method of evaluation of innovation and competitiveness of innovative projects, 3(3) (2012) [Google Scholar]
  30. V. Sergeyev, E. Kiparskaya, D. Podyimalo, Fundamentals of innovative design (2010) [Google Scholar]
  31. J. Linton, S. Walsh, J. Morabito, R&D Management, Analysis, ranking and selection of R&D projects in a portfolio, 32(2), 139-148 (2000) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. A. Sotavov, Improvement of methods of project management of innovations in the field of information technologies: dissertations of candidate of economic sciences, 189 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  33. T. Renkema, E. Berghout, Innovation Technology, Methods for innovation evaluation at the proposal stage: a comparative review, 39, №1, 1-13 (1997) [Google Scholar]
  34. M. Mumford, K. Bedell-Avers, S. Hunter, Multi-level issues in creativity and innovation, Planning for innovation: A multi-level perspective, 107-154 (2008) [Google Scholar]
  35. S. Stevens, On the theory of scales of measurement (1946) [Google Scholar]
  36. V. Venkatesh, MIS quarterly, User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view, 425-478 (2003) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. E. Rogers, Simon and Schuster, Diffusion of innovations (2010) [Google Scholar]
  38. I. Ajzen, Organizational behavior and human decision processes, The theory of planned behavior, 50, №2, 179-211 (1991) [Google Scholar]
  39. K. Kuan, P. Chau, A perception-based model for EDI adoption in small businesses using a technology-organization-environment framework (2001) [Google Scholar]
  40. L. Tornatzky, M. Fleischer, A. Chakrabarti, Processes of technological innovation (1996) [Google Scholar]
  41. M. Pan, W. Jang, Determinants of the adoption of ERP within the technological-organization-environment framework for communication industry (2008) [Google Scholar]
  42. O. Lee, M. Wang, Knowledge management systems diffusion in Chinese enterprises: A multistage approach using the technology-organization-environment framework (2009). [Google Scholar]
  43. A. Osterwalder, Harvard Business Review, A better way to think about your business model, 6 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  44. H. Jonkers, E. Proper, M. Turner, White Paper W, TOGAF™ and ArchiMate®: A future together, 192 (2009). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.