EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 111 (2019) E3S Web Conf., 111 (2019) 03007 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 111, 2019
CLIMA 2019 Congress
Article Number 03007
Number of page(s) 6
Section High Energy Performance and Sustainable Buildings
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/201911103007
Published online 13 August 2019
  1. J.C.Vischer, Towards a user-centred theory of the built environment. Building Research & Information, 36(3): p. 231-240 (2008). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Sant’Anna, D.O., et al., Indoor environmental quality perception and users’ satisfaction of conventional and green buildings in Brazil. Sustainable Cities and Society, 43: p. 95–110 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  3. R. Mora, and R. Bean, Thermal Comfort: Designing for People. ASHRAE J, 60: p. 40–46 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  4. G. Brager, and L. Baker, Occupant satisfaction in mixed-mode buildings. Building Research & Information, 37(4): p. 369-380 (2009) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. T. Hoyt, E. Arens, and H. Zhang, Extending air temperature setpoints: Simulated energy savings and design considerations for new and retrofit buildings. Building and Environment,88: p. 89–96 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  6. J. Verhaart, M. Veselý, and W. Zeiler, Personal heating: effectiveness and energy use. Building Research & Information, 43(3): p. 346-354 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. M. Luo, E. Arents, H. Zhang, A. Ghahramani, and Z. Wang, Thermal comfort evaluated for combinations of energy-efficient personal heating and cooling devices. Building and Environment,143: p. 206–216 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  8. A.C. Cosma, and R. Simha, Thermal comfort modeling in transient conditions using real-time local body temperature extraction with a thermographic camera. Building and Environment,143: p. 36–47 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  9. E. Arens, M.A. Humphreys, R. de Dear, H. Zhang Are ‘class A’temperature requirements realistic or desirable? Building and Environment, 45(1): p. 4-10 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  10. C. Huizenga, S. Abbaszadeh, L. Zagreus, and E. Arens, Air quality and thermal comfort in office buildings: results of a large indoor environmental quality survey. Proceeding of Healthy Buildings,3, 393–397 (2006) [Google Scholar]
  11. H.B. Rijal, M.A. Humphreys, and J.F. Nicol, Towards an adaptive model for thermal comfort in Japanese offices. Building Research & Information, 45(7): p. 717-729 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. R. De Dear, and G.S. Brager, Developing an adaptive model of thermal comfort and preference . UC Berkeley: Center for the Built Environment,(1998) [Google Scholar]
  13. ASHRAE Standard 55-2013. Thermal environmental conditions for human occupancy, p. 12, (2013) [Google Scholar]
  14. K. Cena, and J.A. Clark, Bioengineering, Thermal Physiology and Comfort, Elsevier Science (1981) [Google Scholar]
  15. A. Boerstra, J. Van Hoof, and A. Van Weele, A new hybrid thermal comfort guideline for the Netherlands: background and development . Architectural Science Review,58(1): p. 24-34 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  16. S. Carlucci, L. Bai, R. de Dear, L. Yang, Review of adaptive thermal comfort models in built environmental regulatory documents. Building and Environment,137: p. 73–89 (2018) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.