EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 111 (2019) E3S Web Conf., 111 (2019) 04019 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 111, 2019
CLIMA 2019 Congress
Article Number 04019
Number of page(s) 6
Section High Energy Performance and Sustainable Buildings, Simulation models and predictive tools for the buildings HVAC, IEQ and energy
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/201911104019
Published online 13 August 2019
  1. Deconinck, A.-H. and S. Roels, Comparison of characterisation methods determining the thermal resistance of building components from onsite measurements. Energy and Buildings, 2016. 130: p. 309–320. [Google Scholar]
  2. Deconinck, A.-H. and S. Roels, Is stochastic grey-box modelling suited for physical properties estimation of building components from on-site measurements? Journal of Building Physics, 2017. 40(5): p. 444-471. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Deconinck, A.-H. and S. Roels, The as-built thermal quality of building components: characterising non-stationary phenomena through inverse modelling. Energy Procedia, 2017. 132: p. 351–356. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gori, V., V. Marincioni, P. Biddulph, and C.A. Elwell, Inferring the thermal resistance and effective thermal mass distribution of a wall from in situ measurements to characterise heat transfer at both the interior and exterior surfaces. Energy and Buildings, 2017. 135: p. 398–409. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Martín, K., I. Flores, C. Escudero, A. Apaolaza, and J.M. Sala, Methodology for the calculation of response factors through experimental tests and validation with simulation. Energy and Buildings, 2010. 42(4): p. 461–467. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Sala, J.M., A. Urresti, K. Martín, I. Flores, and A. Apaolaza, Static and dynamic thermal characterisation of a hollow brick wall: Tests and numerical analysis. Energy and Buildings, 2008. 40(8): p. 1513–1520. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Yesilata, B. and P. Turgut, A simple dynamic measurement technique for comparing thermal insulation performances of anisotropic building materials. Energy and Buildings, 2007. 39(9): p. 1027–1034. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. ISO, B., 8990: 1996, Thermal insulation. Determination of steady-state thermal transmission properties. Calibrated and guarded hot box, BSI, ISBN 0, 1996. 580(26826): p. 8. [Google Scholar]
  9. Robinson, A.J., F.J. Lesage, A. Reilly, G. McGranaghan, G. Byrne, R. O’Hegarty, and O. Kinnane, A new transient method for determining thermal properties of wall sections. Energy and Buildings, 2017. 142: p. 139–146. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. ASTM, C., 1046-95 (Reapproved 2001): Standard practice for in-situ measurement of heat flux and temperature on building envelope components. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, 2001. 4. [Google Scholar]
  11. ASTM, C., 1155-95 (Reapproved 2001): Standard practice for determining thermal resistance of building envelope components from the in-situ data. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, 2001. 4. [Google Scholar]
  12. ISO, I., 9869: Thermal insulation—Building elements—In-situ measurements of thermal resistance and thermal transmittance. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  13. Atsonios, I.A., I.D. Mandilaras, D.A. Kontogeorgos, and M.A. Founti, A comparative assessment of the standardized methods for the in–situ measurement of the thermal resistance of building walls. Energy and Buildings, 2017. 154: p. 198–206. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Biddulph, P., V. Gori, C.A. Elwell, C. Scott, C. Rye, R. Lowe, and T. Oreszczyn, Inferring the thermal resistance and effective thermal mass of a wall using frequent temperature and heat flux measurements. Energy and Buildings, 2014. 78: p. 10–16. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Rasooli, A., L. Itard, and C.I. Ferreira, A response factor-based method for the rapid in-situ determination of wall’s thermal resistance in existing buildings. Energy and Buildings, 2016. 119: p. 51–61. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Cesaratto, P.G., M. De Carli, and S. Marinetti, Effect of different parameters on the in situ thermal conductance evaluation. Energy and Buildings, 2011. 43(7): p. 1792–1801. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Wang, F., D. Wang, X. Wang, and J. Yao, A data analysis method for detecting wall thermal resistance considering wind velocity in situ. Energy and Buildings, 2010. 42(10): p. 1647–1653. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Baker, P., Technical Paper 10: U‐ values and traditional buildings-In situ measurements and their comparisons to calculated values. 2011. [Google Scholar]
  19. Ahmad, A., M. Maslehuddin, and L.M. Al-Hadhrami, In situ measurement of thermal transmittance and thermal resistance of hollow reinforced precast concrete walls. Energy and Buildings, 2014. 84: p. 132–141. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Baker, P., Technical Paper 2: In situ U-value measurements in traditional buildings–preliminary results. 2008. [Google Scholar]
  21. Rasooli, A. and L. Itard, In-situ characterization of walls’ thermal resistance: An extension to the ISO 9869 standard method. Energy and Buildings, 2018. 179: p. 374–383. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. COMSOL Multiphysics® v. 5.3.a www.comsol.com. COMSOL AB, S., Sweden [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.