EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 114 (2019) E3S Web Conf., 114 (2019) 06006 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 114, 2019
International Conference of Young Scientists “Energy Systems Research 2019”
Article Number 06006
Number of page(s) 7
Section Advanced Energy Technologies
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/201911406006
Published online 04 September 2019
  1. S.S.A. Syed-Hassan, Y. Wang, S. Hu, et al., Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 80, pp. 888–913, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.262 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. A. Ramos, E. Monteiro, V. Silva, A. Rouboa, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 81, pp. 380–398, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.07.025 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. M. Kacprzak, E. Neczaj, K. Fijalkowski, et al., Environmental Research, vol. 156, pp. 39–46, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2017.03.010 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. J. Werther and T.Ogada, Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, vol. 25, pp. 55–116, 1999. DOI: 10.1016/S0360-1285(98)00020-3 [Google Scholar]
  5. C. Freda, G. Cornacchia, A. Romanelli, et al., Fuel, vol. 212, pp. 88–94, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2017.10.013 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. J.H. Sung, S.K. Back, B.M. Jeong, et al., Fuel Processing Technology, vol. 172, pp. 79–85, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2017.12.005 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. D.L. Urban and M.J. Antal Jr., Fuel, vol. 61, pp. 799–806, 1982. DOI: 10.1016/0016-2361(82)90306-4 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. L. Nowicki and S. Ledakowicz, Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, vol. 110, pp. 220–228, 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaap.2014.09.004 [Google Scholar]
  9. B. Urych and A. Smolinski, Energy & Fuels, vol. 30, pp. 4869–4878, 2016. DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b00332 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. L.F. Calvo, M. Otero, B.M. Jenkins, et al., Thermochimica Acta, vol. 409, pp. 127–135, 2004. DOI: 10.1016/S0040-6031(03)00359-9 [Google Scholar]
  11. M.B. Folgueras, R.M. Dı́az, J. Xiberta, I. Prieto, Fuel, vol. 82, pp. 2051–2055, 2003. DOI: 10.1016/S0016-2361(03)00161-3 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. M. Otero, L.F. Calvo, M.V. Gil, et al., Bioresource Technology, vol. 99, pp. 6311–6319, 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.12.011 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. A. Magdziarz and M. Wilk, Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, vol. 114, pp. 519–529, 2013. DOI: 10.1007/s10973-012-2933-y [Google Scholar]
  14. A. Kijo-Kleczkowska, K. Środa, M. Kosowska-Golachowska, et al,. Waste Management, vol. 46, pp. 459–471, 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2015.08.015 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. A. Kijo-Kleczkowska, K. Środa, M. Kosowska-Golachowska, et al., Fuel, vol. 170, pp. 141–160, 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2015.12.026 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. S.B. Liaw, X. Chen, Y. Yu, M. Costa and H. Wu, “Effect of particle size on particulate matter emissions during biosolid char combustion under air and oxyfuel conditions,” Fuel, vol. 232, pp. 251–256, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2018.05.163 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. C. Mock, H. Lee, S. Choi and V. Manovic, Fuel, vol. 200, pp. 467–480, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2017.03.055 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. M. Dogru, A. Midilli and C.R. Howarth, Fuel Processing Technology, vol. 75, pp. 55–82, 2002. DOI: 10.1016/S0378-3820(01)00234-X [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. J. Zhu, Y. Yang, L. Yang and Y. Zhu, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 43, pp. 5463–5472, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.01.171 [Google Scholar]
  20. M. Kim, Y. Lee, J. Park, et al., Waste Management, vol. 49, pp. 204–211, 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2016.01.040 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. M. Seggiani, S. Vitolo, M. Puccini and A. Bellini, Fuel, vol. v, pp. 486–491, 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2011.08.054 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Z. Ong, Y. Cheng, T. Maneerung, et al., AIChE Journal, vol. 61, pp. 2508–2521, 2015. DOI: 10.1002/aic.14836 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. M.P. Järvinen, R. Zevenhoven, E.K. Vakkilainen, Combustion and Flame, vol. 131, pp. 357–370, 2002. DOI: 10.1016/S0010-2180(02)00415-7 [Google Scholar]
  24. I.G. Donskoi, A.N. Kozlov, D.A. Svishchev and V.A. Shamanskii, Thermal Engineering, vol. 64, pp. 258–264, 2017. DOI: 10.1134/S0040601517040024 [Google Scholar]
  25. L. Peng, Y. Wang, Z. Lei and G. Cheng, Bioresource Technology, vol. 114, pp. 698–702, 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.03.079 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. A.A. Vostrikov, O.N. Fedyaeva, A.V. Shishkin, et al., Solid Fuel Chemistry, vol. 42, pp. 384–393, 2008. DOI: 10.3103/S0361521908060116 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. E. Elsner, M. Wysocki, P. Niegodajew and R. Borecki, Applied Energy, vol. 202, pp. 213–227, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.05.148 [Google Scholar]
  28. I. Petersen, J. Werther, Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification, vol. 44, pp. 717–736, 2005. DOI: 10.1016/j.cep.2004.09.001 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. T.Y. Mun, J.W. Kim and J.S. Kim, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 38, pp. 5226–5234, 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.10.120 [Google Scholar]
  30. Y.K. Choi, T.Y. Mun, M.H. Cho and J.S. Kim, Energy, vol. 114, pp. 121–128, 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2016.07.166 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. M. Niu, B. Jin, Y. Huang, et al., International Journal of Chemical Reactor Engineering, 20170044, 2018. DOI: 10.1515/ijcre-2017-0044 [Google Scholar]
  32. Y. Sun, Z. Zhang, L. Liu, X. Wang, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 41, pp. 5916–5926, 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.02.110 [Google Scholar]
  33. Y. Sun, J. Chem, Z. Zhang, Fuel, vol. 220, pp. 318–329, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2018.01.142 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. M. Seggiani, M. Puccini and S. Vitolo, Chemical Engineering Transactions, vol. 32, pp. 895–900, 2013. DOI: 10.3303/CET1332150 [Google Scholar]
  35. F. Montagnaro, C. Tregambi, P. Salatino, et al., Fuel, vol. 231, pp. 468–478, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2018.05.094 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. I. Petersen, J. Werther, Chemical Engineering Science, vol. 60, pp. 4469–4484, 2005. DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2005.02.058 [Google Scholar]
  37. Y. Wang, L. Yan, Asia‐Pacific Journal of Chemical Engineering, vol. 3, pp. 161–170, 2008. DOI: 10.1002/apj.128 [Google Scholar]
  38. W.C. Yan, Y. Shen, S. You, et al., Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 178, pp. 476–493, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.009 [Google Scholar]
  39. R. Rodrigues, “Modelagem cinética e de equilíbrio combinadas para simulação de processos de gaseificação,” PhD Thesis, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  40. I.G. Donskoy, V.A. Shamansky, A.N. Kozlov, D.A. Svishchev, Combustion Theory and Modelling, vol. 21, pp. 529–559, 2017. DOI: 10.1080/13647830.2016.1259505 [Google Scholar]
  41. A. Gomez-Barea, B. Leckner, Fuel, vol. 107, pp. 419–431, 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2012.09.084 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. P. Kangas, P. Koukkari, M. Hupa, Energy & Fuels, vol. 28, pp. 6361–6370, 2014. DOI: 10.1021/ef501343d [Google Scholar]
  43. A.Z. Mendiburu, J.A. Carvalho Jr., R. Zanzi, et al., Energy, vol. 71, pp. 624–637, 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2014.05.010 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. I.G. Donskoi, “Process simulation of the co-gasification of wood and polymeric materials in a fixed bed,” Solid Fuel Chemistry, vol. 52, pp. 121–127, 2018. DOI: 10.3103/S0361521918020027 [Google Scholar]
  45. I.G. Donskoy, Bulletin of the Tomsk Polytechnic University. Geo Assets Engineering, vol. 330, no. 2, pp. 7-18, 2019. DOI: 10.18799/24131830/2019/2/89 [Google Scholar]
  46. M.J. Prins, K.J. Ptasinski, Energy, vol. 30, pp. 982–1002, 2005. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2004.08.010 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  47. I.G. Donskoy, A.Yu. Marinchenko, A.M. Kler and A.F. Ryzhkov, Thermophysics and Aeromechanics, vol. 22, pp. 639–646, 2015. DOI: 10.1134/S0869864315050127 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.