Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 118, 2019
2019 4th International Conference on Advances in Energy and Environment Research (ICAEER 2019)
Article Number 01036
Number of page(s) 4
Section Energy Engineering, Materials and Technology
Published online 04 October 2019
  1. Zhang You. Research and application of SO3 measurement in flue gas, Zhejiang University (2013) [Google Scholar]
  2. Hu Dong, Wang Hai gang, Guo Tingting, Sun Baomin. Research and Development of Mitigating Technology of SO3 in Flue Gas from Coal Power Plants, Science Technology and Engineering, 15 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  3. Ahn J, Okerlund R, Fry A, et al. Sulfur trioxide formation during oxy-coal combustion, International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 5 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  4. Zhu Congbing, Jin Baosheng, Zhong Zhaoping, et al. Selection of carrier for V2O5-WO3/TiO2 catalyst, Proceeding of the CSEE, 28 (2008) [Google Scholar]
  5. Forzatti P. Present status and perspectives in de-NOx SCR catalysis, Applied Catalysis A: General, 222 (2001) [Google Scholar]
  6. Ye Zhuang, Jason Kaumb, Richard Liggett. et al. Impacts of acid gases on mercury oxidation across SCR catalyst, Fuel Processing Technology, 88 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  7. Wang Hongliang, Xue Jianming, Xu Yueyang, et al. Formation and control of SO3 from coal-fired power plant, Electric Power Technology and Environmental Protection, 30 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  8. Kwon Dw, Park K H, Hong S C. Enhancement of SCR activity and SO2 resistance on VOx/TiO2 catalyst by addition of molybdenum, Chemical Engineering Journal, 284 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  9. Schwammle T, Bertsche F, Hartung A, et al. Influence of geometrical parameters of honeycomb commercial SCR-DeNOx-catalysts on de-NOx-activity, mercury oxidation and SO2/SO3 – conversion, Chemical Engineering Journal, 222 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  10. Chen Xiaolu, Zhao Qingxin, Bao Yiqun, et al. Experimental research on SO3 removal, Journal of Chinese Society of Power Engineering, 34 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  11. Chen P. Research of SO3 removal from flue-gas by calcium-based absorbents, Shandong University, (2011) [Google Scholar]
  12. Moretti A L, Triscori R J, R Itzenthaler D P.A system approach to SO3 mitigation.Combined Power Plant, Air Pollutant Control Mega Symposium.(2006) [Google Scholar]
  13. Li Jianguo, Li Zhuhai, Li Weidong, et al. Research on Flue Gas Co-benefit Control Technical Route in Coal-fired Power Plants, China Environmental Protection Industry, 5 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  14. Liao Zengan, Research and Development of Low Temperature Electrostatic Precipitation Technology for Utilization of Waste Heat in Coal-fired Power Plants, Liaoning Urban and Rural Environmental Science & Technology, 33 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  15. Chen Pengfang, Zhu Gengfu, Zhang Junxiang. Research on SO3 removal efficiency by flue gas co-benefit control technique of coal-fired power plants based on field tests, Environmental Pollution and Control. 39 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  16. Shen Zhigang, Liu Qizhen, Tao Leixing. et al Removal characteristics of particulate matters in flue gas by wet electrostatic precipitator, Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering. 5 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  17. Luo Fei, Hu Bin, Wu Hao, Yang Linjun. et al. Experimental study on removal properties of PM2.5 and sulfuric acid mist by wet electrostatic precipitator, Journal of southeast university. 47 (2017) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.