EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 122 (2019) E3S Web Conf., 122 (2019) 01006 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 122, 2019
2019 The 2nd International Conference on Renewable Energy and Environment Engineering (REEE 2019)
Article Number 01006
Number of page(s) 5
Section Clean Energy and Energy Engineering
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/201912201006
Published online 14 October 2019
  1. Middleton W.E., History of the Theories of Rain and other forms of precipitation. (1966). [Google Scholar]
  2. Khalil, B., et al., A review: dew water collection from radiative passive collectors to recent developments of active collectors. Sustainable Water Resources Management, (2016). 2(1): p.71–86. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Beysens, D., et al., Collecting dew as a water source on small islands: the dew equipment for water project in Bis˘evo (Croatia). Energy, (2007). 32(6): p.1032–1037. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Sharan G., D. Beysens, and I. Milimouk-Melnytchouk, A study of dew water yields on Galvanized iron roofs in Kothara (North-West India). Journal of Arid Environments, (2007). 69(2): p.259–269. [Google Scholar]
  5. Clus, O., et al., Dew, fog and rain water collectors in a village of S-Morocco (Idouasskssou). Desalination and Water Treatment, (2013). 51(19–21): p.4235–4238. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Sharan, G., et al., A very large dew and rain ridge collector in the Kutch area (Gujarat, India). Journal of hydrology, (2011). 405(1): p.171–181. [Google Scholar]
  7. Monteith J.L., Dew. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, (1957). 83(357): p.322–341. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Muselli, M., et al., Dew and rain water collection in the Dalmatian Coast, Croatia. Atmospheric Research, (2009). 92(4): p.455–463. [Google Scholar]
  9. Maestre-Valero J., et al., Comparative analysis of two polyethylene foil materials for dew harvesting in a semi-arid climate. Journal of hydrology, (2011). 410(1): p.84–91. [Google Scholar]
  10. Lekouch, I., et al., Rooftop dew, fog and rain collection in southwest Morocco and predictive dew modeling using neural networks. Journal of hydrology, (2012). 448: p.60–72. [Google Scholar]
  11. Berkowicz, S.M., et al., Urban dew collection under semi-arid conditions:Jerusalem. (2004). [Google Scholar]
  12. Jacobs A.F.G., B.G. Heusinkveld, and S.M. Berkowicz, Passive dew collection in a grassland area, The Netherlands. Atmospheric Research, (2008). 87(3): p.377–385. [Google Scholar]
  13. Clus, O., et al., Study of dew water collection in humid tropical islands. Journal of hydrology, (2008). 361(1): p.159–171. [Google Scholar]
  14. Peel M.C., B.L. Finlayson, and T.A. McMahon, Updated world map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification. Hydrology and earth system sciences discussions, (2007). 4(2): p.439–473. [Google Scholar]
  15. Ministry of Presidential Affairs, N.C.o.M. (2018) [cited 2018 25/5/2018]; Available from: https://www.ncm.ae/en/index.html#!/Radar_UAE_A_D_ReflectivityAD-DP/26. [Google Scholar]
  16. data.org, c. 2018s 25/05/2018]; Available from: https://en.climate-data.org/asia/united-arab-emirates/abu-dhabi/abu-dhabi-3217/. [Google Scholar]
  17. Clus, O., et al., Comparison of various radiation- cooled dew condensers using computational fluid dynamics. Desalination, (2009). 249(2): p.707–712. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Tomaszkiewicz, M., et al., Dew as a sustainable non-conventional water resource: a critical review. Environmental reviews, (2015). 23(4): p.425–442. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Beysens, D., et al., Using radiative cooling to condense atmospheric vapor: a study to improve water yield. Journal of hydrology, (2003). 276(1): p.1–11. [Google Scholar]
  20. Avallone E., I. Baumeister, and A. Sadegh, Marks' Standard Handbook for Mechanical Engineers. 10. (2006): New York: McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar]
  21. Alnaser W. and A. Barakat, Use of condensed water vapour from the atmosphere for irrigation in Bahrain. Applied Energy, 2000. 65(1): p.3–18. [Google Scholar]
  22. Adafruit Industries, U.f.D.e.a.k. DHT11 basic temperature-humidity sensor + extras ID: 386 2017 [cited 2017 25/12/2017]; Available from: https://www.adafruit.com/product/386. [Google Scholar]
  23. ThingSpeak, , The open IoTplatform with MATLAB analytics. 2018. [Google Scholar]
  24. Edouard Cabay E.P., Dew harvesting devices and their application in architecture. (2014), Ecole Spéciale dʼArchitecture, Paris. [Google Scholar]
  25. Muselli M., D. Beysens, and I. Milimouk, A comparative study of two large radiative dew water condensers. Journal of Arid Environments, (2006). 64(1): p.54–76. [Google Scholar]
  26. Spronken-Smith R. and T. Oke, Scale modelling of nocturnal cooling in urban parks. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 1999. 93(2): p.287–312. [Google Scholar]
  27. Kim Y.-H. and J.-J. Baik, Maximum urban heat island intensity in Seoul. Journal of applied meteorology, (2002). 41(6): p.651–659. [Google Scholar]
  28. Gedzelman, S., et al., Mesoscale aspects of the urban heat island around New York City. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, (2003). 75(1–2): p.29–42. [Google Scholar]
  29. Unkašević M., O. Jovanović, and T. Popović, Urban-suburban/rural vapour pressure and relative humidity differences at fixed hours over the area of Belgrade city. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, (2001). 68(1–2): p.67–73. [Google Scholar]
  30. Fortuniak K., K. Klysik, and J. Wibig, Urban-rural contrasts of meteorological parameters in L0dz. Theoretical and applied climatology, (2006). 84(1–3): p.91–101. [Google Scholar]
  31. Kuttler, W., et al., Urban/rural atmospheric water vapour pressure differences and urban moisture excess in Krefeld, Germany. International Journal of Climatology: A Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, (2007). 27(14): p.2005–2015. [Google Scholar]
  32. Beysens, D., et al., Measurement and modelling of dew in island, coastal and alpine areas. Atmospheric Research, (2005). 73(1–2): p.1–22. [Google Scholar]
  33. Sizirici B., Modified biosand filter coupled with a solar water pasteurizer: Decontamination study. Journal of Water Process Engineering, (2018). 23: p.277–284. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.